IIPRD

MAY 9, 2024

This has led to the introduction of intellectual property rights which are a set of exclusionary rights as it excludes the world from enjoying a set of rights arising out an invention or creation, except the inventor or creator. Cross-licensing agreements can both restrain and advance competition.

Intellectual Property Law 59

Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property Licensing Law 59

Canadian Intellectual Property Blog

NOVEMBER 15, 2021

Trade show booths often include demonstration systems, brochures, and marketing presentations that are only available for the two or three days of the show. Unfortunately, what is good for the sharing of information is often not good for the patenting of inventions that arise from the research and products presented at these conferences.

Art 52

Art Invention Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Law 52

SpicyIP

MARCH 13, 2023

Highlights of the Week Learning from India’s Disastrous Experience in Protecting Itself against Biopiracy In light of the upcoming WIPO Diplomatic Conference on Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge, Prashant Reddy brings us a post highlighting India’s sub-par experience with its own Biological Diversity Act, 2002. Microsoft v.

Intellectual Property Law 104

Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property Trademark IP 104

IIPRD

SEPTEMBER 28, 2022

Intellectual property right plays a vital role in achieving this developmental role. It is a mechanism for the protection of rights granted to the creators of ideas, inventions products etc. The pronounced reason for IPRs is to animate development, by giving higher monetary returns than the market in any case might offer.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Business Licensing Intellectual Property Law 52

IIPRD

MARCH 21, 2024

Introduction Competition law and intellectual property rights (IPR) are like two different sides of the same coin, as they both work to ensure vibrancy in the market and promote consumer welfare. In the legal world, competition law and IPR law are often represented by a term, i.e., “friends in disagreement.” [1]

Intellectual Property 98

Intellectual Property Law Licensing Intellectual Property Law 98

LexBlog IP

APRIL 12, 2023

.” But our problem often is that the law, or lawyers, frequently use unfamiliar or exotic terms that others claim have no more understood meaning than a reference to a “ vermicious kind ,” and those or other lawyers may overuse a word that they do not seem to actually comprehend. One is the case of Abitron Austria GMBH v.

Law 52

Law IP Intellectual Property Copyright 52