2002 Designs Patent Law 
The IPKat
SEPTEMBER 3, 2021
In this ruling, which originated from a design invalidity claim before the EUIPO (OHIM, as it was known then), the Court of Justice construed the meaning of the ‘informed user’. Under EU design law, the ‘informed user’ is the standard on the basis of which it examines both the validity and the infringement of a design.
IPilogue
SEPTEMBER 28, 2021
However, this 2002 decision did not define whether AI technology can be an inventor. But such a non-human inventor can neither be an applicant for a patent nor a grantee of a patent.” United Kingdom: Thaler v The Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2020] EWHC 2412 (Pat).
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
IPilogue
JUNE 2, 2022
Thaler’s application for his AI, DABUS, to be the patent owner of an invention titled “ Food container and devices and methods for attracting enhanced attention ,” a product solely created by DABUS without any human interference. What Does This Mean in the Canadian Context? In Apotex Inc v Wellcome Foundation.,
SpicyIP
DECEMBER 2, 2024
Image from here Analysing the Riyadh Design Law Treaty in the Indian Context After nearly two decades of negotiations, WIPO Member States have adopted the Design Law Treaty (DLT). In this post by Kartikeya S., he discusses the key points from the treaty. Singh, and Senior Advocates, Mr. C.S. Read more for the details.
Patently-O
NOVEMBER 29, 2023
by Dennis Crouch The Supreme Court is set to consider several significant patent law petitions addressing a range of issues from the application of obviousness standards, challenges to PTAB procedures, interpretation of joinder time limits IPR, to the proper scope patent eligibility doctrine. Orlando Ventura , 537 U.S.
The IPKat
SEPTEMBER 15, 2022
One of the first enacted changes concerned the rules for calculation of the compensation paid to the patent owner in the event that an invention, utility model, or industrial design is being used without the patent owner’s authorization. These rules were introduced in the 2021 amendment to Article 1360 of the Civil Code.
Patently-O
MAY 2, 2022
2022) focuses on the classic patent law question of whether the inventor’s pre-filing sales activity serve to bar the patent from issuing. Application of the on sale bar is a question of law as is the underlying issue of whether the experimental use exception applies. 2002) (offer to make a “remote database object.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
136 
Let's personalize your content