Remove 2002 Remove Designs Remove Patent Application
article thumbnail

Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court asks CJEU regarding the role of alternative designs in establishing functionality

The IPKat

While this Kat was inquiring about the role of alternative designs in examination of Art. 8(1) Regulation 6/2002, the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court (OLG Düsseldorf) sent a referral to the CJEU on just this issue ( C-684/21 ). 8(1) Regulation 6/2002. The case goes as follows.

Designs 111
article thumbnail

How patent’s priority affects the protection of industrial designs

Garrigues Blog

Today, April 27, is International Design Day, an event, which seeks to recognize the value of design in society and business. On this significant date, we take the opportunity to look at a recent judgment by the General Court of the European Union (EGC) that will allow companies to extend the protection of a design by twelve months.

Designs 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Full Scope Written Description

Patently-O

.” Full Scope Written Description : The Patent Act requires that the specification include “a written description of the invention.” The specification needs to convey that the inventor had “possession” of the claimed invention as of the patent application’s filing date. 35 U.S.C. §

Inventor 132
article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (November 25 – December 1)

SpicyIP

Here is our recap of last week’s top IP developments including summaries of the posts on IPO’s patent application rejection of HIV drug Dolutegravir, another judgement in the long-running Section 3(k) saga, this time on the patentability of business methods and the DHC IPD’s Annual Report 2023-24. In this post by Kartikeya S.,

article thumbnail

Australia’s Reversal of its DABUS decision on AI-Generated Inventions: How Does this Impact an Imminent Canadian Discussion on AI Inventorship?

IPilogue

In 2021 , the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) issued a non-compliance notice for DABUS’ patent application in Canada. While DABUS’ patent application is still developing in Canada, the recent reversal of the Australian decision will likely impact the future of patent ownership rights of AI.

Invention 110
article thumbnail

Can AI Technology Create a Patent in Canada? A Look at Global Precedence

IPilogue

However, this 2002 decision did not define whether AI technology can be an inventor. But such a non-human inventor can neither be an applicant for a patent nor a grantee of a patent.” United Kingdom: Thaler v The Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2020] EWHC 2412 (Pat).

article thumbnail

IPR And Metaverse

IP and Legal Filings

Within Metaverse, patents must be handled in accordance with three verticals: First, patents for the Metaverse technology itself, which may be further broken down into the hardware and software technologies required to create a distinctive and customized Metaverse. because it is not possible to patent the Metaverse as a whole.