Remove 2002 Remove Copying Remove Publishing
article thumbnail

Audi and the Challenge of Cross-Media Plagiarism Detection

Plagiarism Today

Instead, it was published in 2021 on Douyin, the Chinese equivalent of TikTok, by a prominent video blogger that uses the name Beida Mange. Mange, who has nearly 4 million followers, pointed out the copying in a video comparing the two works. Audi has also removed the video. They compare like works to other works of that type.

article thumbnail

Does Failure to Submit Copies to Copyright Office Put an End to Copyright?

Dear Rich IP Blog

From 1983 to 1989 a print magazine, Postcard Collector, published many articles which we would like to republish. Questions: (1) As I understand it, the publisher would have had to submit 2 copies of the magazine to the Library of Congress to complete the registration process. Our conclusion? So, who owns the magazine copyright?

Copying 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

IPR And Metaverse

IP and Legal Filings

It will enable the metaverse to run smoothly without any brand abusing and illegal copying of the existing IP owners. New Delhi: Universal Law Publishing Co. Google Scholar] New Delhi: Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Government of India; 2002. New York: Longman; 2002. Research and development statistics.

article thumbnail

Parliamentary Standing Committee Report on IPR – a Regressive View

SpicyIP

In 2002, in light of two progressive Supreme Court pronouncements ( Mohini Jain v. 52 to allow for such copying only in government-owned institutions. It further states that there should be a quantitative limit on how much copying is permissible and regulation of the storage of copied works in digital formats.” .

article thumbnail

Dua Lipa Faces Another Copyright Infringement Lawsuit Over “Levitating”

Copyright Lately

Larball Publishing Co. After Bosé’s record company apparently admitted that certain parts of the two songs were “identical,” the copyright in “Don Diablo” was assigned to Larball Publishing Company and Sandy Linzer Productions, the plaintiffs in the new lawsuit against Dua Lipa. Dua Lipa et al.

article thumbnail

Donald C. Brace Memorial Lecture by Professor David Vaver – “User Rights: Fair Use and Beyond”

IPilogue

In Hubbard v Vosper [1972] 2 QB 84 , the Church of Scientology sued a former member for publishing a book criticizing Scientology that contained material copied from Scientology books and documents, as well as confidential information pertaining to Scientology courses. In Théberge v Galerie d’Art du Petit Champlain Inc.

Fair Use 110
article thumbnail

Canadian Copyright, Fair Dealing and Education, Part Four: The Disappearance of Course Packs

Michael Geist

The course packs were copied and typically sold as an alternative to course textbooks. Copyright lobby groups and their supporters have long claimed that the practice relies on fair dealing and that universities are profiting from copying without compensation. between 2002 and 2021.