This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A Kat awaiting weekly IP updates Designs Katfriend Henning Hartwig reviewed the interpretation of Articles 6 and 14 of Regulation 6/2002 (CDR). The UCL Institute of Brand and Innovation Law and MARQUES will host their annual "Question the Trade Mark Judges" event on 25 March 2025. The survey closes on 1 April 2025.
As noted by GuestKat Becky Knott in her earlier post ( here ), brand owners have been very active in protecting their brands through attempts to secure trade mark registrations in response to the rise of the Metaverse.
Background Amgen produces and markets apremilast, a medication for the treatment of certain types of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, under the brand name Otezla. Did the ’515 provisional application provide necessary written description support to entitle the ’101 patent to a March 2002 priority date? Holding(s) No.
Comment Brand owners know that the battle against counterfeiting and piracy remains a challenging one. when are goods supposed to be for personal use, and when should they be assumed to be used in the course of trade), but they also represent a relief for brand owners who can enjoy brief victory in a never ending game of whac-a-mole.
Frank Schechter which says that a common (Generic) name can be registered by anyone, but no one has the exclusive right to that trademark, For instance, the renowned brand Apple has its trademark registered under various classes but the word ‘apple’ diluted under class 29 of the food category. Protective strategies from Dilution.
She settled on the brand name Katie Perry and started her own fashion label in 2007. Katy Perry is a famous American pop artist, who was born Katheryn Hudson, but adopted the stage name Katy Perry in 2002. Ms Taylor produced "luxury loungewear" such as jogger-style pants and t-shirts, which were sold online and in a showroom.
Hotels, Ice Cream, and Shoes as Canvases for Great Brands. . Seth Godin has written about how Nike is a great brand because we can imagine what a Nike hotel would look like. . Speaking of ice cream, Ben & Jerry’s is another great brand , like Nike. . How about another test of brand strength? . sneakerheads.
Introduction Incorporating a novel focus on the digital market environment, the Competition Amendment Act, 2023 stands out as one of the most momentous changes made to the Competition Act of 2002 in the last two decades. The modifications intend to modify the 2002 Competition Act. This promotes transparency and teamwork.
To profit on the reputation of another brand, competitors began copying marks or acquiring deceptively similar trade marks with a desire to obtain the goodwill of well-known marks. The ‘Cycle’ brand is registered under various classes which include food products and incense sticks, dhoop, hair oil, etc.
It will enable the metaverse to run smoothly without any brand abusing and illegal copying of the existing IP owners. Google Scholar] New Delhi: Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Government of India; 2002. New York: Longman; 2002. The Trademarks Act 1999 along with trade Marks Rules 2002. The Design Act.
Another crucial change is abolishing the national regime of exhaustion of IP rights for certain goods and brands. The list includes such well-known brands as Apple, HP, Panasonic, Siemens, Tesla, and Volkswagen. The list includes such well-known brands as Apple, HP, Panasonic, Siemens, Tesla, and Volkswagen.
If the property of a person can be protected, likewise, when a popular celebrity like Amitabh Bachchan faces possible harm regarding his brand, the same can be protected under his right to publicity. Additionally, there are provisions that accord protection to publicity rights under the Constitution of India, and the Competition Act, 2002.
Subodh Chachra Proprietor Of M/S Expose vs V2 Promoters Pvt Ltd on 3 March, 2025 (Delhi District Court) the plaintiff, owner of the trademark “X’POSE” for apparel, sued the defendant for infringing and passing off its brand name in the hospitality sector through “XPOSE LOUNGE.” Citing Jaisuryas Retail Ventures v.
MSCHF has frequently targeted major brands. 2d 410, 414-415 (SDNY 2002)) that the Supreme Court expressly used to “offer as one last example” of “a case with a striking resemblance” in which the Rogers test was cabined. Unlike the defendant in Jack Daniel’s , MSCHF, at least amongst its relevant consumers, has a valuable brand.
In the soap war between HUL and Sebamed, Sebamed released an advertisement comparing an HUL branded soap with RIN detergent stating that HUL’s soap’s pH values are similar to that of RIN. To substantiate, for e.g., currently the law only allows brands selling yogurts to compare their and rival yogurt’s features. Sangita Sharma.
Apparently, Monster launched its MONSTER ENERGY® drink brand including its ® mark (the “Claw Icon”) in 2002. Apparently realizing the importance of its brand, Monster owns at least fourteen federal trademark registrations that include the Claw Icon in various classes of goods and services (the “Asserted Marks”).
Celebrities are often invited to collaborate to the creation of specific products, or even find themselves at the helm of a brand's artistic direction. Van Hilst BV applied to the EUIPO for a declaration of invalidity of the Community design based on Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002. Handelsmaatschappij J.
Trademark represents the reputation and goodwill of the brand or company and gives its owner exclusive right to use the mark. pronounced “Exactly”), the brand Exactly Corp. In 2002, the defendant started using trade mark ‘AZIWIN; in the market for the azithromycin tablets. certification mark etc.
Moreover, the name earned by the brand helped it in establishing 81 retail outlets overall at different locations such as New Delhi, Pune, Noida, Bangalore, and Mumbai, and registered several trademarks for the brand of ‘THEOBROMA’ and for its different variants. Over time, it gained a good reputation and earned popularity.
With more brands, there are chances of more counterfeiting goods that need effective coordination with different authorities helping them to streamline coordination. This will help them in their awareness and help them in equipping them with their cost-effective brand management techniques.
Background Amgen produces and markets apremilast, a medication for the treatment of certain types of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, under the brand name Otezla. Did the ’515 provisional application provide necessary written description support to entitle the ’101 patent to a March 2002 priority date? Holding(s) No.
CIPL) from infringing the French brand Lacoste’s iconic “Crocodile” device. A Prolonged Struggle for Device Supremacy Dating back to the early decades of the 20th century, with the cropping up of the two fashion brands, the dispute primarily revolved around the rights of the parties vested in the impugned mark.
Mahindra & Mahindra ltd , (2002) 2 SCC 147 and Kirloskar Diesel v. For instance, the three stripes of Adidas inscribed on a clothing immediately connects it to the world-famous brand. years is actually sufficient to form a strong brand value. Kirloskar Proprietary , 1995 SCC OnLine Bom 312). Likelihood of Confusion.
We should therefore reflect on the importance of designs in the past, present and future of our society in general, and on business activity in particular, where it undoubtedly offers a competitive edge in improving the appearance and function of products, contributing to innovation and the positioning of brands.
Image from here Traditional Knowledge in Patents: Need for Clarity and Interpretation By Vishno Sudheendra and Kevin Preji The MHC in a recent judgment, in M/s.The Zero Brand Zone Pvt. The Judgment M/s.The Zero Brand Zone Pvt. Their previous posts can be accessed here and here.
on 9 February, 2024 (Delhi High Court) The key issue was whether the time limit for filing evidence in Opposition proceedings before the Trade Marks Registry, specifically the “two plus one month” aggregate three months’ period under the 2002 Rules, is mandatory or merely a guideline. . & Anr. The appeal was allowed.
By establishing a brand name, a service provider in the hospitality industry can benefit from having many customers and build a good reputation. Hotels and restaurants must get their brand names and logos registered as trademarks for the ease of operating a business in India. For more visit: [link].
Bournvita’s Sugar Rush Against ‘FoodPharmer’: An Unreasoned Injunction and a Clarification Without Clarity Recently, the DHC passed an interim injunction against the social media influencer ‘Food Pharmer,’ restraining him from disparaging Mondelez’s ‘Bournvita’ and ‘Tang’ branded products.
Olfactory marketing is not only employed by restaurants for their food, but is also often utilized in supplementing branding because just like a logo, it helps the consumer identify the experience associated with a service or product. Deutsches Patent und Markenant.
The average consumer of this type of product is accustomed to this type of position trade marks and, in principle, can be guided by them when purchasing the product ( R 938/2000 , R 813/2002-1 ). The public has become accustomed to identifying a particular brand of running shoe or sports shirt based solely on a distinctive sign.
In 2002, Korea exported technology worth US$0.6 Since 2002 Korea has increased its R&D expenditure from 2.6% cola brand is estimated to be worth US$80 billion. core technologies, which otherwise would have remained ([link]. In Europe, 36% of patents are not used. billion and imported technology worth US$2.7
But linguistic wordsare often very common and if used exclusively, will be incapable of distinguishing a particular brand from another, in addition tobeing hit by the provision of Section 9(1)(b) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Trademarks must have a distinguishing capacity and must be ‘distinctive’ in itself. Jitender V. Jain and Anr.,
However, this argument did not satisfy the Court, which on the contrary, specified that it was those characteristics that are specific to Lidl’s brand. Tesco attempted to argue that it had a right to use the combination of the yellow and blue colours for commercial reasons (without the text).
As a reminder to brand owners looking to enter the China market, SpecialKat Tian Lu considered in her post how powerful the Chinese language integrity point can be. Copyright One of the main principles of the Berne Convention is that of national treatment. An equivalent provision is also included in the Design Directive 98/71/EC.
How to Franchise your brand name. A business’s trademark is not just its marker but also a representation of its goodwill and its way to ensure that an average purchaser does not confuse it with a different brand. Importance of Agreement. The most crucial section in this regard is Section 49 of the Act. Example Case.
The majority says this case is easily resolved by its 2002 Revell precedent (a progeny of the legendary, and legendarily bad, 1997 Zippo precedent ): Our decision in Revell requires dismissal. Branded tees and coffee mugs have nothing to do with Johnson’s libel claim. But that doesn’t matter.
Even in cases wherein there is no commercial aspect to the misuse of one’s likeness, because the persona of the individual is in itself a brand and carries public goodwill, it would be considered passing-off if such likeness is used without authorization. 893 of 2002 (Del) (India). [2] References: [link] [link] [link] [1] CS (O.S.)
The mark ‘ALPHARD’ may not be distinct to the general public but there could have been a viable argument that it is distinct to the ‘relevant section of the public’ who are interested in MUVs/ Minivans and generally in foreign cars and automotive brands.
Amgen markets apremilast, a phosphodiesterase-4 (“PDE4”) inhibitor, which is used for treating psoriasis and related conditions, under the brand name Otezla® which is covered by three patents, U.S. He has an extensive background in chemistry and food science. Patents 7,427,638 , 7,893,101 , and 10,092,541.
The French brand sells a range of blouses that are both romantic and classic ( e.g. Darcy, Fraisier ), minimalist tops ( e.g. Esterel ), oversized sweatshirts with delicate details ( e.g. Erlanger, Dunes ) and jumpers combining a cosy and structured style ( e.g. The court then analysed the copyright infringement. A Kat taking a rest.
The "Easy" group is famously protective of its trade marks, and does not shy away from suing other companies using "easy"-formative brands. Background The Claimant, EasyGroup Ltd (EasyGroup), is part of the well-known "Easy" group of companies controlled by Sir Stelios Haji-Ioannou, the founder of easyJet.
A business’s trademark is not just its marker but also a representation of its goodwill and its way to ensure that an average purchaser does not confuse it with a different brand. The most crucial section in this regard is Section 49 of the Act. In the landmark American case of Barcamerica International USA Trust v. 3d 589 (9th Cir.
This may include creating products with certain distinct features, such as a particular smell or a sound that is exclusive to the product and the brand. Thus, several companies have attempted to manufacture products implanted with a particular smell that is exclusive to the brand.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content