2002 Artistic Work Copying 
IP and Legal Filings
OCTOBER 23, 2021
Copyright laws play a crucial role in protecting creative expressions such as literary works, artistic works and musical works. This exclusive rights comprises of the right to copy, distribute, perform, license or adapt the work. It officially came into force in March 2002. WIPO Copyright Treaty.
SpicyIP
MARCH 9, 2025
Case Summaries Abbott Healthcare Private Limited vs Vinsac Pharma on 17 February, 2025 (Delhi High Court) Abbott Healthcare sued two defendants for trademark and copyright infringement, claiming they deceptively copied its well-known LIMCEE Vitamin C tablets by selling LIMEECEE with similar packaging. Citing Jaisuryas Retail Ventures v.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The IPKat
MAY 2, 2023
Copyright The Court also established that Lidl’s mark was protected by copyright as an original artistic work under Section 4 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Therefore, the Court considered that Tesco had copied a substantial part of Lidl’s mark with text, and thus also infringed Lidl’s copyright in the logo.
Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog
DECEMBER 4, 2023
Article 27 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) establishes the entitlement to enjoy the protection of moral and material interests arising from scientific, literary, or artistic creations. This applies to literary, dramatic, musical, artistic works, computer programs, cinematograph films, and sound recordings.
43(B)log
OCTOBER 25, 2021
The district court granted summary judgment on the resulting trademark claims, reasoning that plaintiffs’ likelihood of confusion showing was “not strong enough to meet the standard that applies to artistic works. Occasionally been used in the title to artistic works” is a red herring. This part is not persuasive.
IP and Legal Filings
AUGUST 14, 2023
Person A makes a copy of the movie on his phone and shares it with his friends. Going back to the same example again, the first point of infringement would be where A illegally copied the film. In this scenario, when infringement has become borderless, should the rule of lex loci protectionis be blanketly applied to all the cases?
Kluwer Copyright Blog
SEPTEMBER 16, 2021
82 of 2002 ) itself. Upon such request, and if deemed both urgent and necessary, the competent court possesses a wide range of non-exhaustive measures, including but not limited to the “ suspension of production, exhibition, publication or reproduction of the work, performance, sound recording or broadcast program ” (art. 179(3) ECL).
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
98 
Let's personalize your content