article thumbnail

3 Count: Not World Series

Plagiarism Today

Rodriguez sued the team in August alleging that, back in 2002, he created a stylized version of the Braves logo for a high school art class. Finally today, Patrick Danner at the San Antonio Express-News reports that a Jose Antonio Rodriguez has dropped his lawsuit against the Major League Baseball team the Atlanta Braves.

Reporting 246
article thumbnail

General Court to decide whether consumables are component parts of complex products (T-617/21)

The IPKat

The BoA decision has been appealed, so the General Court (and potentially, the Court of Justice) will provide guidance as to whether consumables fall under the scope of Art. Because it is invisible during normal use of the torch, the invalidity applicant claimed that the visibility requirement set out in Art. Under Art.

Art 135
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

CJEU confirms that partial designs may be protected as unregistered designs (but conditions apply)

The IPKat

In it, the CJEU confirmed that an Unregistered Community Design under Regulation 6/2002 may vest in a partial design (which the CJEU defines as “a section of the ‘whole’ that is the product”). 3(c) and Art. 4(2) of Regulation 6/2002 [i.e., 11(2) of Regulation 6/2002 (para. 11(2) of Regulation 6/2002 (para.

Designs 145
article thumbnail

A table and a table coaster that shaped EU design law

The IPKat

10 of Design Regulation 6/2002, the scope of the protection conferred by a Community design shall extend to ‘any design which does not produce on the informed user a different overall impression’. Regulation 6/2002 does not define, however, what an ‘informed user’ is. The issue of informed user was thus crucial to both parties.

Designs 136
article thumbnail

Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc, No. 2022-1147 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 19, 2023)

Intellectual Property Law Blog

Regarding the ’101 patent, Sandoz argued that the district court erred in holding that the ’515 provisional application inherently disclosed the crystalline Form B of apremilast and thus that it did not provide the necessary written description support to entitle the patent to a March 2002 priority date. Holding(s) No.

Art 130
article thumbnail

Canons and Canards: Recreating Prior Art

Patently-O

2002) (Note, this is Juicy Whip II. In The Barbed Wire Cases , the patent challengers had introduced oral testimony from 24 eye-witnesses who each testified that they saw a prior art fence on display a county fair in 1858, and including at least one person of skill in the art (a blacksmith). Beat ‘Em All Barbed-Wire Co.,

Art 78
article thumbnail

A design for heated socks is not necessarily functional, says EUIPO BoA

The IPKat

If so, the upper part of the sock must remain visible during normal use (Art. 4(2) Regulation 6/2002 on Community designs ). Under Art. They argued inter alia that (i) the contested design is a component of a complex product that does not remain visible during normal use (art. According to the BoA, Art. Thus, Art.

Designs 129