This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The case concerned the Australian trade mark registration for the words "KATIE PERRY" (No. Katy Perry is a famous American pop artist, who was born Katheryn Hudson, but adopted the stage name Katy Perry in 2002. Her management team set up a web-store by 24 September 2008 to advertise and sell such merchandise.
2] However, the quintessential reason for such distinction is due to a slightly elevated standard for the registration of non-traditional marks. Image Source : Shutterstock] The Trademarks Act, 1999 (‘Act’) refers exclusively to the registrability of ‘combination of colours’. [3] In this also falls the case of colour marks.
The plaintiffs argued that the in Parle Agro’s label, “For the Bold” was prominently displayed and emphasis was given to the contested tagline in all the advertising campaigns. As evidence, advertisements featuring on Parle’s Facebook Page on 28 th November 2020 and 3 rd January 2021 were presented before the court. For the Bold!”
There has been quite a bit of debate around the registrability of GUIs under industrial design law in India. While the Designs Act, 2002, recognised protection for GUIs, the Indian Patents Office has been reluctant to grant registration to GUIs. In the case of UST Global (Singapore) Pte.
The plaintiff has made various efforts to make their trademark famous like advertising and has hosted various sports and cultural events including international cricket matches. The plaintiff by these advertisements has gained a big market all over the world. The fourth schedule to Trade Marks Rules, 2002 – [link].
The NAKED condom case returned to the TTAB after a CAFC reversal [ TTABlogged here ] and the Supreme Court's denial of the registrant's petition for writ of certiorari (September 2021). Nor did respondent have advertising material or seek FDA approval. He conducted clinical trials in 2000 and manufacturing began in 2002-2003.
Four of those were rejected in Q1 2024 for complaining about the registration of a website, not an established website where infringement is taking place. It’s designed to prevent advertisers from doing business with the sites but also rolls in ISP blocking for good measure. 10downloader.com 71. genteflowmp3.one nswgame.com 2.
EasyGroup, on the other hand, relied on certain registrations which it acquired from a third party as part of a settlement following another(!) The aim is to allow proprietors to adapt their marks in accordance with marketing and promotional requirements. The Court disagreed.
There is no registration fee for any of the seminars. Though he applied in 1992, registration was granted only in 2020. Later, he discovered the trademark had expired since 2002 without prior notice, violating Rule 58(3) of the Trade Marks Rules, 2017. Read the post for more details. Citing Jaisuryas Retail Ventures v.
The Board rendered a split decision in this opposition to registration of the mark EVOGUE for a wide variety of consumer electronic devices and accessories, tossing out Opposer Advance Magazine's Section 2(d) claim but partly upholding its dilution claim, based on the registered mark VOGUE for, inter alia , magazines and mobile phone software.
Because the plaintiff doesn’t own the relevant registration, its §32 claims fail, but the court allows §43(a) claims to proceed, partially reversing the district court’s grant of summary judgment—but read on for more on what that might look like. Assignments before registration need not be in writing, but the evidence must be clear. “[R]equiring
” The system of trademark classification eases the process of registration of a trademark. Thus, it gives the trademark registration process a definite structure. The Fourth Schedule to the Trademark Rules, 2002, lays down the different trademark classes. NICE Classification ). & Ors , it was held that.
Class 35 – Dealing with office functions, advertising, business administration, and business management. The Indian Hotels Company Limited filed a Trademark Application for the Taj Mahal Palace Hotel in Mumbai and obtained its registration. Class 25 – Dealing with headgear, footwear, and clothing.
Case Summaries Hmd Mobile India Private Limited vs Mr Rajan Aggarwal & Anr on 9 February, 2024 (Delhi HC) image from here The Plaintiff had filed a petition under Section 50 of the Copyright Act, 1957 for expunging the copyright registration against the Defendant.
The article analyses Sumitomo’s application and the requisites for registration of an olfactory mark. A Brief About Olfactory Marks Sumitomo’s application is particularly interesting because this was the first olfactory trademark registration in the UK (see here ) and has since lapsed.
Background On 12 April 2022 Paredes Holding Center SL (the Applicant) filed an application for the EU registration of the position trade mark no. The average consumer of this type of product is accustomed to this type of position trade marks and, in principle, can be guided by them when purchasing the product ( R 938/2000 , R 813/2002-1 ).
Background “Nürnberger Rostbratwürste” (literally, “Nurember grilled sausage”) is a PGI from Germany, registered in 2002. registration documents), this is a PGI for a “7-9 cm long sausage”. According to the product specifications (i.e. 13(1)(b), now Art. 13(1)(c), now Art. 13(1)(d), now Art.
Effectively, the Court has permanently restrained CIPL’s use of the mark through manufacturing, selling, offering for sale or advertising the products on which it was affixed. This mark consists of a device featuring the crocodile/saurian logo, of which both claimed to be the prior adopters across multiple countries.
4(1), 7 of Regulation 6/2002 , ‘Design Regulation’). Further, an incorrect date could constitute misleading advertising under Art. A Registered Community Design (‘RCD’) enjoys protection only if it is new and has individual character vis-à-vis designs disclosed prior to its filing or priority date ( Art. 7(1) Design Regulation ).
For only the second time since the CAFC's 2009 decision in In re Bose , the Board upheld a claim of fraud, ordering cancellation of a registration for the mark FUJIIRYOKI for massage chairs. William Shen, the CEO of Respondent ACIGI, filed the underlying application and then assigned the registration to ACIGI soon after issuance.
The theory of Territoriality states that since disputes relating to the registration and validity of intellectual property rights are typically considered to fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the State in which such registration was applied for, the choice of law should favour that State. Will there be no remedy at all?
There was no evidence of third-party use or registration by any company using the same mark to identify energy drinks or other beverages and e-liquids, and no evidence of any third party manufacturing both energy drinks and e-liquids with different marks. [Is this an end-run around the family-of-marks issue? -
Instances of companies using IP as collateral during times of distress are as follows: Xerox pledged its Patents as collateral due to problems faced concerning financial fraud and certain distress in 2002. The National IPR Policy of 2016 has resulted in increasing IP registration since its inception.
The Trade Marks Act, 1999 governs trademark law in India and provides for the registration, protection, and enforcement of trademarks. 14 provides that if anyone files an application for the registration of a trademark, the consent of the living person must be taken and it should not be falsely or fraudulently obtained.
The Supreme Court of Canada last considered the definition of “inventor” in 2002, but has yet to consider whether it would include non-human entities. common law) trademarks recognized under the Trademarks Act may appear on public signs, posters, and commercial advertising in Quebec, in languages exclusively other than French.
Highlights of the Week Learning from India’s Disastrous Experience in Protecting Itself against Biopiracy In light of the upcoming WIPO Diplomatic Conference on Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge, Prashant Reddy brings us a post highlighting India’s sub-par experience with its own Biological Diversity Act, 2002.
In Australia, Manolo Blahnik owns a number of trade mark registrations including: Reg No. 02 Jul 2002. 22 Oct 2002. Trade mark. Priority date. Goods and services. MANOLO BLAHNIK. 29 Apr 1992. Class 25: Footwear in this class. 04 Aug 1995. Class 25: Footwear. 04 Aug 2995. 1156524.
CCI , the Delhi High Court held that Chapter XVI of the Patents Act is a complete code in itself and overrides the Competition Act, 2002. Tech Square which was passed against a cancellation petition filed by Toyota against the registration of “Alphard” by Tech Square. Setting aside the Single Judge orders in Ericsson v.
When a trademark is used to produce high-quality services, provide consistent and positive customer service, advertise effectively, and provide high-quality goods and services, it becomes a brand. 1] [link] [2] [link] [3] Competition Act, 2002 S.4 4 [4] Competition Act, 2002 S.3(1) 9(a) and (c).
26, 2025) Pepperdine sued Netflix for Lanham Act trademark infringement, contributory infringement, dilution, false advertising, and coordinate state claims based on Netflixs Running Point series, which depicts a team known as the Waves. 3d 894 (2002) (Barbie Girl) and University of Ala. MCA Records, Inc., of Trustees v. Warner Bros.
Matt Sag: What looks like an increase over time may be an artifact of the way cases became available on WL post-2002 or so. Not all innovations are good or desirable: innovative advertising may target consumers in vulnerable positions; innovative branding can be employed for discriminatory/racist ad targeting.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content