This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The ad, which was produced by the London-based advertising agency M&C Saatchi, featured prominent Hong Kong actor and musician Andy Lau Tak-wah as he delivered a monologue about Xiaoman, the eighth solar term and second solar term of summer on the traditional Chinese calendar. Bottom Line.
Under the Community Design Regulation (EC 6/2002), an owner of a Community design right has several options when bringing an infringement case. As a primary rule, article 88(1) stipulates that the Community design courts shall apply the provisions of the Regulation on the matters covered thereby.
The trade mark application was filed by an Australian fashion designer, who was born Katie Jane Perry but has also gone by the names Katie Howell and Katie Taylor (called "Ms Taylor" in the judgment). Katy Perry is a famous American pop artist, who was born Katheryn Hudson, but adopted the stage name Katy Perry in 2002.
A Registered Community Design (‘RCD’) enjoys protection only if it is new and has individual character vis-à-vis designs disclosed prior to its filing or priority date ( Art. 4(1), 7 of Regulation 6/2002 , ‘Design Regulation’). 7(1) Design Regulation ). 7(1) Design Regulation ). 6 of Directive 2005/29/EC.
There has been quite a bit of debate around the registrability of GUIs under industrial design law in India. While the Designs Act, 2002, recognised protection for GUIs, the Indian Patents Office has been reluctant to grant registration to GUIs. Vs. The Controller of Patents and Designs and Anr. [1]
The Defendant had claimed that the idea of the ‘advertisement’ of the Plaintiff’s recent product launch has been copyrighted by the Defendant. In a brief order, the Court stated that expression rather than the idea can be copyrighted and the court did not pass any substantial orders as the reply of the respondents were still to be considered.
. “In the first quarter of 2024 there were 17 final resolutions corresponding to two special procedures (shorter because the responsible party was not duly identified in accordance with article 10 of Law 34/2002, of July 11, 2002, on information society services) and one ordinary procedure,” S2CPI notes. genteflowmp3.one
In November 2002, Novak—who famously starred in an episode of The Office set at a Chili’s restaurant —approached Chili’s about a collaboration with Chain. If you’re cool with paying $65 for elevated versions of food you can get at your local TGI Friday’s for $20, this place is for you.
Through extensive advertising and widespread use, consumers associated “Fevicol” with Pidilite’s adhesive products specifically. 2002 VAD [2] (Delhi) 161, the court deliberated whether the terms “AAJ TAK” and its associated logo were common terms. 1] In the case of Living Media India Limited v. Jitender V.
Back in the late 70s, an insurance agent named Charles Rolfe asked Wesley Streeter, a taxidermist, to design a lightweight turkey decoy mold that could be reproduced and sold commercially. Goode agreed to remove the offending directions from its website, and all was right with the world again.
Later, he discovered the trademark had expired since 2002 without prior notice, violating Rule 58(3) of the Trade Marks Rules, 2017. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants are selling counterfeit products using his registered design without authorization. Basf Se vs Joint Controller Of Patents And Designs and Ors.
They are: the Unfair Competition Law (UCL); the False Advertising Law (FAL); and the Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA). While they often cover the same conduct in false advertising cases and are cumulative of each other, they have differences. 4th 721, 732 (2002). Superior Court, 9 Cal.5th 5th 642, 651 (2020). Google, Inc.,
Rex Exchange purchased a “REX” trademark with a 2002 priority from a company called Azavea that had registered the mark for the following use: “computer software for use in search and displaying real estate information on a global computer network.” It first expanded into Austin in 2018. This is a plausible inference for a jury to make.”
The Fourth Schedule to the Trademark Rules, 2002, lays down the different trademark classes. Advertising; Business management, organization, and administration; Office functions. Under Section 8 of the Trademarks Act, 1999, the Registrar published an alphabetical index of classification of goods and services on 29.11.2013.
Background “Nürnberger Rostbratwürste” (literally, “Nurember grilled sausage”) is a PGI from Germany, registered in 2002. In the view of the court, the scope of protection of PGI “Nürnberger Rostbratwürste” is determined primarily by the indication of origin “Nürnberg” and not by the generic designation “Rostbratwürste”.
Class 35 – Dealing with office functions, advertising, business administration, and business management. Obtaining trademark protection for the Taj Mahal Palace Hotel is essentially stronger than copyright or industrial design protection since they deal with the commercial and aesthetic value of the property, respectively.
Nor did respondent have advertising material or seek FDA approval. Respondent's evidence and testimony showed that its principal had worked in the birth control industry since 1989, designing a "relaxed-fit" condom. He conducted clinical trials in 2000 and manufacturing began in 2002-2003.
The Board has long recognized that the 'Internet is such a pervasive medium that virtually everything is advertised and sold through the Internet.'" Opposer launched its MONSTER ENERGY drinks in 2002 and has enjoyed enormous sales (approximately 2.5 1, if not top three, in the entire US in e-liquid sales." TTABlogged here.
Descriptive marks usually ‘consist exclusively of marks or indications which may serve in trade to designate the kind, quality, quantity, intended purpose, values, geographical origin or the time of production of the goods or rendering of the service or other characteristics of the goods or service (again, tyres don’t smell like roses!)
22] However, to remedy this caveat, the court propounded that designating a colour using an internationally recognised identification code (such as Pantone) will constitute a graphical representation, being precise and stable. [23] 15] Sieckmann (C-273/00) EU:C:2002:748 [2003] Ch 487 [16] Vatsala, Supra note 2, at page 129. [17]
In other words, copyright does not prevent others from creating a similar software program or user interface, as long as they do not copy the original code or design. In 2002, the Indian Patent Office issued guidelines on the patentability of CRIs. These guidelines provided that computer programs per se were not patentable inventions.
John Doe Orders: A John Doe order is a form of pre-infringement injunction designed to protect the intellectual property rights of the author. The goods (which should be trademarked, copyrighted, patented and design registered) must be recorded with the customs office. Such an order is always granted ex- parte.
Instances of companies using IP as collateral during times of distress are as follows: Xerox pledged its Patents as collateral due to problems faced concerning financial fraud and certain distress in 2002. Masai is an international player in the footwear industry engaged in designing, marketing, and distributing shoes.
Devender Kumar Jain vs Solanki Industries Pvt Ltd on 9 April, 2025 (Rohini, Delhi District Court) The suit was filed under Section 22 of the Designs Act for permanent injunction, damages, and other reliefs against design infringement of two registered switches Sleek Designed and Flyover Designed.
The lower court was unpersuaded: “Doe’s negligent design claim similarly aims to hold Snap liable for communications exchanged between Doe and Guess-Mazock.” Here, Doe brings a design defect claim. Take away those messages, and the plaintiff’s negligent design claim would be nonsensical.
02 Jul 2002. 22 Oct 2002. Estro Concept Pty Limited ( Estro ), the prospective respondent, runs two retail stores described as “luxury designer outlets” offering a wide selection of competitively priced fashion apparel, items and accessories from Europe’s most prestigious designers. Class 25: Footwear in this class.
Highlights of the Week Learning from India’s Disastrous Experience in Protecting Itself against Biopiracy In light of the upcoming WIPO Diplomatic Conference on Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge, Prashant Reddy brings us a post highlighting India’s sub-par experience with its own Biological Diversity Act, 2002. Microsoft v.
CCI , the Delhi High Court held that Chapter XVI of the Patents Act is a complete code in itself and overrides the Competition Act, 2002. Controller of Patents & Designs Patent Office Mumbai. Controller of Patents and Designs and Raytheon Company v. CCI and Monsanto v. Microsoft Technology Licensing v. In Microsoft v.
Matt Sag: What looks like an increase over time may be an artifact of the way cases became available on WL post-2002 or so. Not all innovations are good or desirable: innovative advertising may target consumers in vulnerable positions; innovative branding can be employed for discriminatory/racist ad targeting. Woods and Derek E.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content