SpicyIP

AUGUST 4, 2024

Tejas Misra explains why and how these seemingly innocuous posts may infringe on the shooter’s personality rights. The petitioner proved prior use by placing documents on record since 2001. The Court was of the view that this would cause injury and loss to the plaintiff.

Social Media 105

Social Media Trademark Licensing Music 105

IIPRD

AUGUST 11, 2023

Donjinshiisa self-published fan bookthatuses the existing manga characters violating the personality rights of the characters as was established in the famous caseof V.T. 3d 1004, 1021, 1022 (2001). [3] There is no question of fair use as although it is not commercially beneficial but it is neither limited to private use.

Art 52

Art IP Intellectual Property Copyright 52

43(B)log

AUGUST 9, 2024

Roots as old as 2001 Directive ordering methods developed, as well as 512(j)(1) allowing site-blocking injunctions in the US which has never really been tested in court. Authors’ rights are designed to protect that intellectual and emotional bond. DSM Directive in EU and US developments were all about enforcement on the elephants.

Fair Use 59

Fair Use Moral Rights Law IP 59

The IPKat

SEPTEMBER 27, 2023

The IPKat has received and is pleased to host the following contribution by Danish Katfriends Jakob Plesner Mathiasen and Thit Nymand Nisbeth (both Gorrissen Federspiel) on the interplay between AI, deepfakes, and personality rights in the form of image/publicity rights. However, there is no federal law regarding the matter.

Personality Rights 130

Personality Rights Advertising Advertising Publishing 130

SpicyIP

JANUARY 2, 2022

The suit concerned agreements dating back to 2001 between IPRS and ENIL regarding broadcasting music in certain cities. The petitioner contented that Jayalalithaa’s personality rights and her family’s privacy rights should be protected and that the productions may be incorrect and misleading.

IP 143

IP Intellectual Property Copyright Trademark 143