The IPKat

SEPTEMBER 15, 2022

Initially, neither the 1992 Law on Trademarks, Service Marks and Designations of Origin , nor the 1992 Patent Law , had provided that putting patented or trademarked goods onto the market within Russia exhausted IP rights.

IP 133

IP Brands Branding Branding 133

The IP Law Blog

JUNE 22, 2023

The challenged patents are continuations of and claim priority to a patent application filed on February 4, 2000, and published as U.S. Patent Appl. 2001/0047262 (“Kurganov-262”). Kurganov-262 has the same specification as the challenged patents. In the I.P.R., 01/050453 to Kovatch (“Kovatch”).

Art 98

Art Patent Patent Application Invention 98

Garrigues Blog

JANUARY 12, 2022

In addition, a third party’s use of an invention before its registration by another is also relevant to assess patent infringement. The right of prior use is set forth in article 63 of the current Patents Law of 2015, the wording of which is practically identical to that of article 54 of the earlier Patents Law of 1986.

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Invention Patent Patent Law 52

IP and Legal Filings

JUNE 12, 2023

billion in 2001 to USD 120 billion now. Exclusion of Technical Function: Generally speaking, any shapes, features, or characteristics that are solely utilitarian or required to achieve a technological outcome are not protected by copyright, trademark, design, or patent laws. The trademark of Coca-Cola is its most valuable asset.

IP 98

IP Intellectual Property Trademark Designs 98

Patently-O

MAY 2, 2022

2022) focuses on the classic patent law question of whether the inventor’s pre-filing sales activity serve to bar the patent from issuing. 2001) (Judge Lourie Concurring). by Dennis Crouch. On Sale Bar : The Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Sunoco Partners v. Venture (Fed. In re Kollar , 286 F.3d

Invention 83

Invention Contracts Licensing Inventor 83

Intepat

AUGUST 25, 2023

The 2003 Rules came in super session of the erstwhile Patents Rules, 1972 and provided an elaborate description of the filing procedure and allied actions. However, considering the gap of 20 years, there was a need to bring about certain amendments with the changing interpretations and dynamics of patent law.

Patent 52

Patent Patent Application Government Designs 52

SpicyIP

MARCH 11, 2024

The plaintiff has registered its “Social” trademark and states to have invested considerably in its advertisement from 2001-2023. Law Commission releases Report on “Trade Secrets and Economic Espionage”, recommends a legislation to protect trade secrets. Justice Prathiba M Singh’s Commentary on patents law released.

Trademark 59

Trademark Registration Copyright Patent Application 59

Patently-O

MARCH 30, 2022

patent law. 62 (1853), the famous inventor of the single-line telegraph (Morse) claimed patent rights to the use of electro-magnetism for transmitting a signal–without limit to any “specific machinery or parts.” by Dennis Crouch. Functional claim language has long been a mainstay of U.S. Morse , 56 U.S.

Art 58

Art Inventor Invention Patent 58

Patently-O

JANUARY 20, 2023

Applicants, for their part, are not required to disclose prior art that is not material to patentability or that is cumulative of other prior art they’ve already provided. It may surprise you, then, to learn that the genre of science fiction is deeply indebted to patent law and patent theory. See [link].

Patent Law 96

Patent Law Law Inventor Patent 96

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

MARCH 1, 2024

Product patent- This law is important for providing safeguards to products. For modern and synthetic biological drugs, chemical compounds, genetically modified proteins, and gene sequences are protected under product patent law. This patent is important in the pharmaceutical industry and in the food and dairy sectors.

Patent 105

Patent Inventor Invention Intellectual Property 105

SpicyIP

JUNE 22, 2022

Though the report examines the EU / Belgian patent law landscape, it contains informative insights into the use of compulsory licenses and competition regulation in the context of excessively priced medicines. In contrast, a compulsory license forces patentees to grant licenses to third parties with adequate remuneration.

Licensing 119

Licensing Reporting Patent Government 119

The IPKat

NOVEMBER 29, 2021

In 1990, Dr Llewelyn was appointed to a lectureship at the University of Central Lancashire, at Preston, which was followed in 1993 by a move to the University of Sheffield, initially as a ‘Common Law Institute for Intellectual Property (CLIP) Lecturer in Intellectual Property.’

Intellectual Property 81

Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Law IP Law 81

The IPKat

AUGUST 6, 2023

Only two of the 43 areas deal with American copyright law (probably a correct percentage given the EU focus of IPKat), but this small number should have disqualified me from writing a book review where there are 41 out of 43 articles on topics I know nothing about, including the entire fields of trade mark and patent law.

Intellectual Property Law 52

Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property Law Copyright Law 52

SpicyIP

AUGUST 2, 2021

Parliamentary Standing Committee Report on IPR: Tipping the Scales of Patent Law? Continuing our posts on the Parliamentary Standing Committee Report, I wrote a II-part post on the Report’s recommendations on patent law reform. Part I and II.

Reporting 116

Reporting Designs Design IP 116

The IPKat

FEBRUARY 26, 2025

In Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd v Comptroller-General of Patents ( Case C-130/11 ), 19 July 2012, the CJEU ruled that melatonin for the treatment of insomnia in humans could be the subject of a SPC on the basis of a marketing authorisation granted in 2007 for this use. Over to the UK legislator to re-draft it.

Marketing 59

Marketing Marketing Law Patent 59

Barry Sookman

MAY 4, 2020

This is a question that is being studied including by the United States Patent and Trade Mark Office (USPTO) which launched an investigation into issues associated with patenting artificial intelligence inventions. patent law, 35 USC §§ 1 et seq. an inventor must be a natural person. In addition, the U.S. Unigate Enter.,

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Inventor Invention Copyright 52