LexBlog IP

AUGUST 30, 2023

1) He made this request on grounds including trademark law and unfair competition law. The third defendant was licensed to produce and market the disputed foods and spices under its own name and at its own expense, paying a fixed fee to the plaintiff for each individual product sold.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Moral Rights Related Rights Art 52

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

JANUARY 19, 2022

Despite no separate law on the protection of domain name, Indian courts have, over the years, given protection under the trademark law. The Respondent had registered their own domain name as www.siffynet.com and www.siffynet.net in 2001 and was providing a similar service. Hence, it gave the injunction. Descriptive Names.

Registration 52

Registration Trademark Cinema Business 52

43(B)log

DECEMBER 20, 2022

Plaintiffs also alleged infringement of Monbo’s right of publicity, unjust enrichment, and violations of the Lanham Act and related Maryland trademark law. The 2001 Documentary “sold 50,000 copies in two weeks and revolutionized the Baltimore dirt-bike culture,” inspiring a sequel and plans to make a third film.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Trademark Copyright Editing 52

SpicyIP

JANUARY 2, 2022

The suit concerned agreements dating back to 2001 between IPRS and ENIL regarding broadcasting music in certain cities. The plaintiff was granted, through an agreement, an exclusive non-transferable, non-assignable license for selling, supplying, and distributing the defendant’s brands in domestic and international markets.

IP 143

IP Intellectual Property Copyright Trademark 143

SpicyIP

JANUARY 30, 2024

2001) and the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Health and Family Welfare in its 59th report (2012) urged the Ministry of Health to put in place processes to prevent the use of names for drugs that are confusingly similar. The Supreme Court of India (in Cadila Health Care Ltd. vs Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd.,

Brands 116

Brands Branding Branding Social Media 116

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

MARCH 4, 2022

This provision of the federal trademark law known as the Lanham Act is codified in 15 USC 1052.) Sections 2(a) and 2(c) both protect an individual’s right of privacy and right of publicity in trademark law by preventing the unauthorized registration of a person’s name, signature, or image.

Registration 126

Registration Blogging Trademark Privacy 126

Patently-O

DECEMBER 12, 2021

4th 387, 404 (2001) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted). [18] Lemley, What the Right of Publicity Can Learn from Trademark Law , 58 Stan. 22] TRUMP TOO SMALL passes this test because it is commentary on TRUMP, not a disguised advertisement that is merely incidental to Donald Trump. 471, 500 (2003)). [16]

Registration 69

Registration Government Advertising Advertising 69