2001 IP Related Rights 
The IPKat
DECEMBER 15, 2023
This post is the third and final instalment in the “Africa IP Highlights 2023" series of posts highlighting some of the key developments in IP in Africa in 2023. As previously stated, the Africa IP Highlights 2023 is the result of collaboration between myself and Clarisse Mideva ; Rita Chindah ; and Jessie Mgonga.
The IPKat
OCTOBER 4, 2022
On September 22, 2022 , the European Union Intellectual Office (EUIPO), through its European Observatory on Infringements of Intellectual Property Rights, published a discussion paper entitled " Automated Content Recognition: IP Enforcement and management use cases ".
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
JANUARY 23, 2024
Similarly, AI output can be deemed a rights-infringing reproduction if the original can be recognised in it. The CJEU based its ruling on this issue in “Pelham” on the aspect of recognisability when it came to the related right of the record producer under Article 2 of the InfoSoc Directive (2001/29) ( C-476/17 – Pelham ).
LexBlog IP
AUGUST 30, 2023
dishes and seasonings) as works of IP. (1) Culpable IP infringement The copyright holder is eligible for compensation and restitution of their moral damages in case of culpable IP infringement. Compensation presupposes culpability and infringement of IP (or related rights) (i.e.,
LexBlog IP
SEPTEMBER 13, 2023
NATURE OF THE CASE The above decisions dealt with requests for a preliminary ruling related to the interpretation of Article 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society. 2) Does Article 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
OCTOBER 7, 2021
and Right to Know CLG challenged a decision by the European Commission to not grant (free and public) access to harmonised standards adopted by the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN). 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 ) was that doing so would undermine the copyright protection of the standards at issue.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
JANUARY 31, 2023
The situation was only different, according to the BGH, in the exceptional cases where providers intentionally collaborated with their customers to commit rights infringements. The “ uploaded III ” case also concerned the infringement of rights of communication to the public via the aforementioned file hosting and sharing service.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
65 
Let's personalize your content