Remove 2001 Remove Advertising Remove Trademark
article thumbnail

Canadian Position on the “Gruyère” Trademark Battle

IPilogue

As the debate heated up, the European Union (EU) stepped in and eventually decided to favour the Swiss in 2001. Interestingly, another battle regarding the Gruyère trademark is happening in North America. However, the fate of the Gruyère trademark in Canada is still up in the air.

Trademark 105
article thumbnail

Landmark Trademark Battles: Shaping Brand Protection Globally and in India

IP and Legal Filings

INTRODUCTION Section 29 [1] of the Trademark Act, 1999 , defines infringement as: “Trademarks infringement occurs if an unauthorized party makes use of a registered trademark in a way that is likely to lead to confusion about the origin of the product.” FAMOUS CASES OF TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT 1.Foreign

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2021

SpicyIP

We’ve tried to represent a diversity of subject matter also in this list, so we have a fair sprinkling of cases dealing with copyright, patents, trademarks, competition law etc. The suit concerned agreements dating back to 2001 between IPRS and ENIL regarding broadcasting music in certain cities. Golden Tobacco Ltd [Delhi High Court].

IP 143
article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (June 5- June 10)

SpicyIP

Highlights of the Week Vistara: The Limitless Possibilities of (Trademark) Expansion Image from here Recently, a Division Bench of the DHC held that Vistara Home Appliances’ use of the Vistara trademark was in bad faith and likely to cause confusion among consumers. an interim relief against Dabur’s Amla oil print advertisement.

article thumbnail

Zara vs. Boungiorno and the possibility (or not) of using third-party trademarks

Garrigues Blog

A judgment from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) clarifies the scope of third-party use of trademarks, taking into account the changes introduced in the European Directive on trademarks. regarding the use of the ZARA trademark. The Commercial Court No.

article thumbnail

The Supreme Court confirms that a third party may not use the ZARA trademark.

Garrigues Blog

The Supreme Court has confirmed that the use of another’s trademark to identify the prize in an advertising campaign constitutes an act of trademark infringement and ordered the infringer to pay compensation for damages. regarding the use of the ZARA trademark, as previously discussed here.

article thumbnail

Lanham Act: Motion for Attorney Fees Should Reveal Evidence of an Exceptional Case

IP and Legal Filings

The cause of action in the original suit was the alleged breach of a settlement with the plaintiff, caused by the defendant’s continued use of the plaintiff’s trademark in advertisements on the big search engine. 2001), wherein spoliation has been discussed. The court referred to the case of Silvestri v. Motors Corp.,