Remove 2001 Remove Advertising Remove Brands
article thumbnail

Landmark Trademark Battles: Shaping Brand Protection Globally and in India

IP and Legal Filings

Protection of trademarks is important for the following reasons: Preservation of brand identity Prevention of customer confusion Business investment protection Fair Competition Innovation in branding Famous infringement cases within the areas of intellectual property underline complex legal issues and stakes involved. Dongre and Ors.

article thumbnail

[Guest post] Can the owner of an artistic work convert it into an NFT for its use in the Metaverse?

The IPKat

On the occasion of the opening of a new store in NY, the well-known clothing brand created a collection of NFTs based on digital copies of works of famous artists such as Miró, Tàpies and Barceló, incorporating various outfits of the collection available at the store, to be displayed in the Decentraland Metaverse, at the coordinates 16.78

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

[Guest post] The ‘brat’ phenomenon: Exploring cultural influence and IP dynamics

The IPKat

slime green (now ‘brat green’) in various means of advertising throughout the promotional campaign. The colour was also used in the official album cover, creating a clear connection with the artist’s advertised work and the inauguration of the era it signalled.

article thumbnail

"Made in the USA" materiality showing requires evidence, not just interested witness testimony

43(B)log

J-B has used unqualified “Made in USA” claims in its advertising. ITW advertises “the interchange between its products and the matching OEM manufacturer products” in its materials, sometimes including OEM interchanges for specific automotive brands in its package advertising. Epoxy: In J-B Weld Co., Gorilla Glue Co.,

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (June 5- June 10)

SpicyIP

on 9 June 2023 (Calcutta High Court) A division bench of the Calcutta High Court allowed an appeal against the District Judge order and clarified that a civil court does not have jurisdiction to determine the validity of registration granted under the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act, 2001.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (April 14 – April 20)

SpicyIP

The plaintiff first registered the mark in 2001, and currently holds valid registration until 2034. Further, the defendant was alleged to be a repeat offender, having previously copied the marks of other well-known brands such as Louis Vuitton. 63, Copyright Act.

article thumbnail

When homage might be a short step away from infringement … or not?

The IPKat

Only a few days ago, news was shared online that energy drink brand Alani Nutrition sued Rise UP and an influencer for copyright infringement and false advertising due to the allegedly unauthorised reproduction of one of its advertising campaigns. Its right pocket has a small star-shaped embroidery with the brand's logo.