This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
We welcome pieces addressing all aspects of the vast domain of international economic law, including trade and development law, international arbitration law, intellectualpropertylaw, international taxation law and everything else in between. The word limit for all blog pieces is 750 to 2000 words.
We are pleased to bring to you this book review of David Llewelyn, Gladys Tan, Estelle Moh Huixuan and Ng Hui Ming’s ‘Modern Law of Copyright in Singapore’, (SAL Academy Publishing, 2023) by Prashant Reddy T. I had the pleasure of collaborating with him on a couple of projects during a year I spent at the School of Law at SMU.
The protection of creators’ rights and their intellectualproperty is the main goal of intellectualpropertylaws. They need to be accepted by the law. One of many Indian laws that defends creators’ intellectualproperty rights is the Copyright Act of 1957.
Goods or items produced outside Bangladesh involving infringement of the Copyright Act, 2000 or infringement of layout design of integrated circuits that are intended for sale or use for commercial purposes within the territory of Bangladesh. 2000 in favor of the Commissioner of Customs of the opted location. Demand draft of Rs.
Furthermore, the Information Technology Act of 2000 makes it a crime to copy or transfer data from another person’s device without their permission. This recorded music is frequently sold at significantly lower prices than market rates, resulting in massive losses for music producers.
It recognizes that generative AI systems are trained by reading, viewing, and listening to copies of human-created works which are subject to copyright protection. The report states that there are no copyright laws right now that would provide protection to any wholly AI generated model or creation (Page no.
Call for Papers: NALSAR’s Indian Journal of IntellectualPropertyLaw (IJIPL) Vol. The Defendant was served with a copy of summons and it did appear in one of the hearings, but later stopped, thus causing the matter to proceed ex-parte. Call for Papers/ Submissions . 13 [Submissions by December 30, 2022]. Image from here.
The widespread availability of low-cost 3D printers will make it easier for anyone to copy even patented products. Designs made with a 3D Printer, on the other hand, may not fall under the legal definition of a design as defined by Section 2(d) of the Designs Act 2000. This could result in a slew of patent infringements. Conclusion.
student at Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow. She is keenly interested in IntellectualPropertyLaw, Technology Law, and Corporate Law ]. Image from here [ This post is co-authored with Tejaswini Kaushal with inputs from Swaraj and an anonymous reader. Tejaswini is a 3rd-year B.A.
January 1, 2024, brought numerous hangovers along with an unprecedented amount of media attention to intellectualpropertylaw. Freed from the shackles of copyright, Walt Disney’s iconic rodent was now in the public domain and, therefore, available for everyone to copy. But not so fast.
It has been copied many times, and recognising any exclusivity in such a move would undoubtedly impede the “technical progress” of the game. Reflecting on the relationship between football and finance, Cruijff declared in 2000, “the first goal of football must be the quality of the game.” More from our authors: Law of Raw Data.
Media and entertainment law, which is a part of intellectualpropertylaw, plays a vital role in dealing with these issues by defending the rights of artists, producers, and distributors. Phonogram makers also have to deal with the problem of others copying their musical note and vocal sound signs and symbols.
By implementing these sophisticated DRM solutions, OTT platforms can safeguard their content from being illegally copied or shared, ensuring that only authorized users have access. OTT platforms can work closely with law enforcement agencies, industry groups, and other stakeholders to identify and shut down illegal streaming sites.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content