Remove 2000 Remove Artistic Work Remove Copying Remove Invention
article thumbnail

IPR and the World of Fashion

IIPRD

However, there lies an unfilled gap between the existence of such rights and their application in the real world which has led to the development of the omnipresent problem of copying an individual’s work rather than using one’s own craftsmanship. Protection under the Designs Act, 2000. Piracy and Fashion Design.

article thumbnail

Copyright Protection of Modern Art

IP and Legal Filings

Cooper case, a work does not have to be entirely unique in order to be protected by copyright; rather, there needs to be some effort put into it and it cannot be a carbon copy of another person’s work. The lack of organisation and ambiguity make the protection problematic even if the work is copyrighted.

Art 52
article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (April 29- May 05)

SpicyIP

The claim of the appellant was that the Controller has failed to realize that impugned invention has already been claimed by the appellant in an earlier patent application and thus, pre-grant opposition should stand on the grounds of anticipation by prior art under Section 25, Patents Act, 1970. Bulgari S.P.A