This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
[These are my rough-draft talk notes from a recent workshop of trademark law professors.] As a super-notice, it can produce cash payouts from settlements or default judgments (which are enforced against the cash held at the online marketplace, so they have actual value).
It is hard enough to negotiate a settlement, but it is even harder if the party knows that the agency is going to be calling it a liar or cheater in a press release. Bring back the workshops (or whatever you want to call them). But not every alleged law violation should be treated the same.
TTABlog Tip: a good way to get rid of bogus affirmative defenses right off the bat is to ask for Board participation in the discovery/settlement conference, whereby the Board participant will review the pleadings and, in my experience, knock out unbaked affirmative defenses. Text Copyright John L. Welch 2024.
Well for starters, attention to dark patterns has migrated from workshops, speeches and press releases to complaints and a consent order. In the recent $100 million FTC settlement with Vonage, the consent order specifically prohibited the use of dark patterns to frustrate cancellation efforts. Why do we say that?
Nevertheless, awareness about dispute settlement strategies can minimise the economic and legal costs of ignoring IPR law. Understanding IPR law enables “legally aware entrepreneurs/techno-entrepreneurs” to navigate these complex transactions and negotiate favourably.
Building internal capabilities and upskilling workforces, e.g., by partnering with academic and quantum-focused research institutes, and considering collaborative initiatives such as secondment programs and workshops. It again involves three key considerations: Formalizing engagement and collaboration.
District Court of Nevada ruled on a host of different requests to exclude evidence, including requests under Daubert and other expert challenges, Rule 408 settlement discussions and evidence of the parties’ respective wealth. Cannata , where the U.S.
The NPRM followed just one day after the FTC announced that it had reached a consent settlement with three companies for alleged unfair trade practices by imposing overly burdensome non-compete agreements. Not surprisingly, the NPRM has sparked a surge of commentary in the legal and business communities and immediately courted controversy.
The NPRM followed just one day after the FTC announced that it had reached a consent settlement with three companies for alleged unfair trade practices by imposing overly burdensome non-compete agreements. Not surprisingly, the NPRM has sparked a surge of commentary in the legal and business communities and immediately courted controversy.
The NPRM followed just one day after the FTC announced that it had reached a consent settlement with three companies for alleged unfair trade practices by imposing overly burdensome non-compete agreements. Not surprisingly, the NPRM has sparked a surge of commentary in the legal and business communities and immediately courted controversy.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content