This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
How to Ask the Right Questions About Utility PatentInfringement Utility patentinfringement is complex, to say the least. You need to ask practical questions that go beyond infringement. Need to enforce or defend a utility patentinfringement claim? What is utility patentinfringement?
On June 28, 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a Notice requesting public comments on the current state of the common law experimental use exception to patentinfringement and whether Congress should consider codifying the experimental use exception through legislative action.
In late November 2021, Lululemon launched a lawsuit for design patentinfringement against Peloton in relation to perceived similarities in the design elements of various pieces of activewear, including sports bras and leggings. This article was written as a requirement for Prof.
Case Summaries L Oreal vs Graphics Traders on 19 October, 2024 (Delhi District Court) Image from here The plaintiff filed a suit alleging import of counterfeit cosmetics by the defendant, bearing its trademarks- “MAYBELLINE” and “BABY LIPS”. No written statements were filed by the defendants. Sri Narasus Coffee Company Private Ltd vs M/S.
What began as a patentinfringement case has swerved into judicial ethics waters, due to the ruling of the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
In September of last year, and in light of a corresponding Japanese patentinfringement suit, I published an article detailing how The Pokmon Company had filed two patent applications at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) after the release of Palworld.
Market Supervision Administration of Guangdong Province "2021 Typical Cases of Intellectual Property Administrative Law Enforcement" patentinfringement case No. Market Supervision Administration of Guangdong Province "2021 Typical Cases of Intellectual Property Administrative Law Enforcement" patentinfringement case No.
The US Patent and Trademark Office is requesting public feedback on the current experimental use exception’s impact on technology sectors—and the public’s appetite for expanding the exception. By: Morgan Lewis
This post will focus on another key issue from the case – the relevance of logos in design patentinfringement analysis. For trademarkinfringement under the Lanham Act, likelihood of consumer confusion is a key requirement. Lubecore Int’l, Inc. , 3d 494 (6th Cir. See Unette Corp. Unit Pack Co. , 2d 1026 (Fed.
Shoe on 23 September, 2024 (Delhi District Court) The plaintiff sought a permanent injunction against defendants for infringement and passing off. The plaintiff claimed to have used the trademark “POLO” since 1967. The Respondent, engaged in a similar business, applied for the trademark in 2023.
PUMA applied for a Federal Trademark registration under Application Serial No. Therefore, Plaintiff is seeking damages for willful trademarkinfringement in violation of 15 U.S.C. 1114 and Design PatentInfringement in violation of 35 U.S.C. § § 271 and 283. 1125 and TrademarkInfringement under Indiana Common Law.
Does your product infringe a patent? Patentinfringement can be tricky, but not incomprehensible. No single article can tell you everything you need to know about infringingpatents, but I hope you will gain some wisdom from reading this post. Which part of the patent determines infringement?
Instead of asking for money damages or an injunction, the accused infringer is asking the court to render a decision that their products do not infringe a particular patent. Need to defend a patentinfringement claim? Second, the patent owner might not want to escalate the fight.
What is the design patentinfringement test? The test for design patentinfringement involves a visual comparison between the patented design and the accused product. Therefore, if an accused product seems very close to such prior art designs, there is a decent probability of no design patentinfringement.
, the executives at Peloton believe that the trademark SPIN is of great importance. Last month (February, 2021), Peloton filed petitions to cancel the trademarks SPIN and SPINNING for physical fitness instruction and for stationary exercise bicycles on the grounds that the marks are generic. This is commonly referred to as Genericide.
The PatentInfringer Lobby has ramped up banging the drum about “patent quality.” They dedicated a week-long campaign to questioning "patent quality,” which its constituents regard as a huge problem. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Andrei Iancu left the building.
Code; and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is hosting regional events in Central Virginia and Silicon Valley to promote resources available to prospective innovators and entrepreneurs. Elsewhere, the Council for Innovation Promotion (C4IP) is holding a webinar on proper use of Section 1498(a) of the U.S.
The Pride in Patent Ownership Act requires those who acquire patents to publicly register their ownership assignments with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) within 120 days. Thus, it serves to identify potential patentinfringement plaintiffs.
How do you defend a patentinfringement claim? Accusations of patentinfringement should be taken seriously. Whether they are asserted in the form of cease-and-desist letter or an Amazon patent violation, an accused infringer needs to gauge the seriousness of the problem. Are your patent claims invalid?
Is patent enforcement possible for small companies? Whatever people may have heard about patent enforcement, one thing is clear. Almost everyone knows that patentinfringement lawsuits are expensive. If patentinfringement litigation is so costly, what options are available to startups and small businesses?
This week in Other Barks & Bites, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) rules against Apple in a trademark dispute; Arbutus and Genevant Sciences file a patentinfringement lawsuit against Pfizer related to the COVID-19 vaccine; and Sweetgreen promptly changes the name of a menu item after Chipotle files a trademark (..)
In matters of trade, Trademark, copyright and Patent act as building blocks of protection measures while conferring exclusive right over goods/services for the holder. Amazon often face patent violations with its increasing customer base and involvement of third-party seller. Patentinfringement can occur in both of these roles.
What began as a patentinfringement case has swerved into judicial ethics waters, due to the ruling of the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
We have previously covered a high profile legal battle in the plant-based meat sector of this industry discussing (1) the first patentinfringement lawsuit in the food tech industry and (2) its related petition for inter partes review (“IPR”) with the Patent and Trademark Appeal.
That is, punitive damages may be applied to intentional infringement and serious patentinfringement. That is, punitive damages may be applied to intentional infringement and serious patentinfringement. By: Linda Liu & Partners
Amazon offers different options for resolving infringement depending upon the type of patent involved. Utility patentinfringement is handled by an Amazon program called APEX which stands for Amazon Patent Evaluation Express. Owning both utility and design patents will provide the broadest scope of protection.
DSI) filed suit against Plaintiff, Perq Software, LLC for PatentInfringement. According to the Complaint, DSI’s software includes numerous technological improvements that were captured in a family of patent applications. In 2022 the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued Patent No.
Patent and Trademark Offices (USPTOs) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has jurisdiction over expired patents brought before it in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings. While the CAFC has previously ruled in appeals from the PTAB involving expired patents, it has not squarely addressed the subject until now.
Remedies for Patent, Trademark, and Copyright InfringementPatent The remedy statute for patentinfringement states, “Upon finding for the claimant the court shall award the claimant damages adequate to compensate for the infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by the infringer, together with interest (..)
The United States Patent and Trademark Office issued Patent No. 10,864,933 (“933 Patent”) entitled “Four Position Hand Truck” to Harper on December 15, 2020. Therefore, Plaintiff is seeking damages for PatentInfringement in violation of 35 U.S. The case was assigned to Judge Damon R.
The December 2021 issue of Sterne Kessler's MarkIt to Market® newsletter discusses new enforcement tools courtesy of the Trademark Modernization Act; Pfizer's acquisition of Arena Pharmaceuticals; the latest developments in Canopy Growth's patentinfringement suit against GW Pharmaceuticals; and the open gTLD Sunrise period.
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and U.S. Copyright Office (USCO) release a joint study on the IP implications of non-fungible tokens (NFTs); The New York Times Company denies “hacking” ChatGPT; and Caltech and Microsoft settle a wi-fi patentinfringement case. This week in Other Barks & Bites: the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that a prevailing defendant in an otherwise “exceptional” patentinfringement case could not recover attorney fees expended in a parallel inter partes review (IPR) proceeding because the defendant’s initiation of the IPR was “voluntary.”
What are the wrong utility patents for enforcement on Amazon? For utility patentinfringement cases, Amazon provides sellers with a neutral patent evaluation program called APEX. The challenge, however, is that not all utility patents will be given an opportunity to participate in the program.
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a draft Request for Comments (RFC) today seeking public feedback “on the current state of the experimental use exception jurisprudence and whether legislative action should be considered to enact a statutory experimental use exception.”
On June 28, 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) requested the public’s views on the current state of the common law experimental use exception to patentinfringement and whether legislative action should be considered to enact a statutory exception (89 FR 53963). By: Fish & Richardson
However, the provision which is an exception to patentinfringement is often criticised for its broad scope. Case Summaries Astellas Pharma Inc vs Astellaz Pharmaceuticals on 3 February, 2025 (Delhi High Court) The suit was filed seeking relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendant from infringing its trademark.
Samridhi Chugh and Manya Gupta write about this order, explaining how the Court appears to have convoluted the issues surrounding the interplay between trademarks, disparagement, and free speech, rather than clarifying them. It involved the plaintiff’s registered trademark, “SUPREME”. The defendant did not appear in the suit.
BTL) has filed a lawsuit against Be Minked Beauty & Company LLC and its owner, Britney Humphrey, accusing them of patentinfringement , trademarkinfringement , and unfair competition. According to the Complaint BTL holds a patent ( Patent No. BTL Industries, Inc.
This week in Other Barks & Bites: the Cloud Native Computing Foundation launches a patent troll bounty program to protect the open-source computing community; the European Patent Office announces Russia Patent Requests will be denied as part of sanctions; and Sweden becomes the first country in the world to file a trademark for its name.
Hardik Mukeshbhai Pansheriya granted an extension in a previously granted interim injunction in favour of the plaintiff in a case concerning the infringement of the trademark ‘Beardo’ [August 16, 2021]. had infringed on five patents held by Sonos. in the Arizona federal court for trademarkinfringement.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content