This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Imagine your company is suddenly inundated with dozens of baseless patentinfringement lawsuits. This scenario is becoming all too common as corporate America grapples with a post-COVID surge in frivolous patent claims, driven by patenttrolls. By: Kilpatrick
There is absolutely no doubt that at least some bad-acting patent owners continue to engage in a systematic game of extortion that leverages judicial inefficiencies and the often-outrageous costs of fighting and winning even when there is absolutely no merit to the patentinfringement allegations.
s argument in its fight at the Federal Circuit that Idaho's law barring "bad faith" allegations of patentinfringement is constitutional. Attorneys general from 27 states, along with tech industry lobbying groups, have thrown their support behind Micron Technology Inc.'s
The term ‘PatentTroll’ originated in 1994 in an educational video by Paula Natasha Chavez called the ‘Patents Video.’ ’ A patenttroll is a term used for describing a company that uses PatentInfringement claims to win arguments and court judgments for profit or to stifle competition.
This week in Other Barks & Bites: the Cloud Native Computing Foundation launches a patenttroll bounty program to protect the open-source computing community; the European Patent Office announces Russia Patent Requests will be denied as part of sanctions; and Sweden becomes the first country in the world to file a trademark for its name.
The second kind, private parties, often use the patents they acquire for profit through damage or settlement awards, or royalties and licensing rights. NPEs who acquire patents solely for profit (and not commercialization) are also called “PatentTrolls” or “ patent assertion entities.”
Introduction Patenttrolls are entities that do not actively develop their inventions but instead acquire patent rights for obvious inventions to prevent others from working on them or to collect licensing fees. In a way, patenttrolls serve a purpose, much like lawyers.
That’s the question posed by a recent spate of lawsuits brought against Apple and Google by Jawbone Innovations LLC alleging patentinfringement on the part of the tech giants. But what if a failed company lived or, or at least its intellectual property?
urged a Texas federal judge to punish a Texas company that Valve called a "patenttroll" in its sanctions motion for allegedly re-arguing "frivolous" legal theories and purposely taking its barcode patentinfringement suit to an allegedly improper venue. Video game maker and online game store operator Valve Corp.
The PatentInfringer Lobby has ramped up banging the drum about “patent quality.” They dedicated a week-long campaign to questioning "patent quality,” which its constituents regard as a huge problem. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Andrei Iancu left the building.
The assault on banks and financial institutions by non-practicing entities or “patenttrolls” continues. Two weeks ago, we discussed a number of patentinfringement suits being filed by Auth Token. based on their support of the mobile payment and digital wallet service, Samsung Pay.
Many of these letters are a typical part of the playbook of entities that have been variously called “non-practicing entities” (NPEs) or “patenttrolls.” Join us to learn about patentinfringement claims, NPEs and other entities who send demand letters, the litigation process, and things you should consider when deciding on an.
Individuals and companies commonly engage in the strategic purchasing of critical blocking patent portfolios. For example, the rise of patenttrolls, who litigate cheaply-bought patents, use the IP system as a legal weapon. Moreover, damage demands in litigation cases involving IP are rising.
Others have accused him of being a “patenttroll” based on the broad interpretation of his patents and his litigious enforcement activity. His entities have filed a whopping 1,249 patentinfringement lawsuits with 23 of those pending. This certainly qualifies as a high volume patenttroll.
Tod Tumey is a Houston-based patent attorney who represents Voice Tech Corp. Back in 2021, VoiceTech sued Mycroft for patentinfringement. The PTO has apparently determined that the asserted claims are not patentable, but that case will be appealed to the Federal Circuit. Tod Tumey v. Mycroft AI ( 8th Cir.
On September 30, 2016, a federal jury in Texas ordered Apple to pay $302 million in damages to VirnetX for violating two of its patents, including patented software used in Apple’s FaceTime and iMessage applications.
This is the latest in the series titled “NPE Showcase,” where we discuss high-volume non-practicing entities (or as some call them, “patenttrolls”). Many high-volume NPEs are subsidiaries of a larger company that segregates liability by creating separate LLCs for each subset of their patent portfolio.
This is the latest in the series titled “NPE Showcase,” where we discuss high-volume non-practicing entities (or as some call them, “patenttrolls”). Sockeye owns a pair of patents broadly related to controlling a “display device” with a mobile phone.
This is the latest in the series titled “NPE Showcase,” where we discuss high-volume non-practicing entities (or as some call them, “patenttrolls”). “Everyone infringes” is an NPE’s dream. Not all NPEs are patenttrolls. [2] Business was booming. But is this the case now?
In 2001, six years before the iPhone appeared, a futurist named Ray Kurzweil wrote that humankind would cram 20,000 years of technological progress into the century that had just begun.
Challenges of Patent Enforcement in a Globalized World: While globalization offers opportunities for expanding patent protection, it also presents challenges, particularly in enforcing patents across different legal systems. This will reduce administrative burdens and enhance cross-border patent collaboration.
The chaotic state of the world today makes it increasingly difficult for American companies to compete. Russian hostility has the democratic world on edge, U.S. inflation is at a 40-year high and hitting consumers hard, and China continues its aggressive push for economic and technological dominance.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content