Remove Patent Application Remove Personality Rights Remove Social Media
article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (November 4-November 10)

SpicyIP

Here is our recap of last week’s top IP developments including summary of the posts on the repudiations against personality rights, Govt. recent circular on procurement of drugs, non-obviousness test under the patents law, and the Hamburg Regional Court’s decision in Robert Kneschke v LAION e.V. The Show Must Go On?

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (August 16 – 22)

SpicyIP

In a guest post , Satchit Bhogle covered the issue of infringement of personality rights. It is noted that the test for identifying infringement of personality rights is to check whether there has been unauthorised use of identity for commercial gain and if there is a likelihood of confusion.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (July 29-August 4)

SpicyIP

Tejas Misra explains why and how these seemingly innocuous posts may infringe on the shooter’s personality rights. & Anr on 2 August, 2024 (Calcutta High Court) The appellant filed an appeal against the order of the Deputy Controller of Patents rejecting its post grant opposition. Star Scientific Limited v.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (August 5-August 11)

SpicyIP

PART I] Synthetic Singers and Voice Theft: BomHC protects Arijit Singh’s Personality Rights In a first of its kind order in India, the BHC restrains AI platforms from using likeness of famous singer Arijit Singh, finding them to prima facie infringe his personality rights. Read on below to know more.

Trademark 104
article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (September 18- September 24)

SpicyIP

Case Summaries Anil Kapoor vs Simply Life India & Ors on 20 September, 2023 (Delhi High Court) Image from here The Plaintiff sought protection of his personality rights, publicity rights and elements associated with his persona like his name, voice, photographs/ likeness, dialogues, manner of dialogue delivery, gestures, signatures.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (November 13- November 19)

SpicyIP

The issue here pertains to the question of whether a patent office located in one place can transfer a patent application to another office in the absence of any specific provision in the law. However, the plaintiff retorted that the work was not permanently situated in the public space.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (May 13- May 19) 

SpicyIP

The plaintiff alleged that the defendant not only manufactures the impugned product but also promotes the same on social media. The patent was rejected by the Deputy Controller on the grounds that the application did not provide exact ratio pesticide and safener being used and for lack of inventive steps.