Remove Ownership Remove Patent Remove Patent Troll
article thumbnail

New Book by Controversial Author Claims Software Ownership is “Killing” Innovation and Competition

IP Close Up

The author of a new book who was previously accused of employing junk economic science says that software ownership is damaging innovation and impeding U.S. competition. Continue reading.

article thumbnail

Osgoode Welcomes Professor Ruth L. Okediji: “The Paradox of Intellectual Property Injustice”

IPilogue

Professor of Law at Harvard Law School, where she teaches contracts, international IP, patents, copyright, and courses on Biblical Law. Individuals and companies commonly engage in the strategic purchasing of critical blocking patent portfolios. Professor Ruth L. Okediji is the Jeremiah Smith Jr.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

NPE Showcase – Leigh Rothschild

LexBlog IP

Most nonpracticing entities are private firms owned by patent attorneys, investors, or a combination of the two. And in virtually all cases, NPEs purchase the asserted patents from another company seeking to divest assets for cash. His entities have filed a whopping 1,249 patent infringement lawsuits with 23 of those pending.

article thumbnail

M&A Checklist — How to Prepare Your IP for the Legal Due Diligence Process

LexBlog IP

IP Ownership Nearly all purchase agreements require the seller to warrant that it owns or licenses the intellectual property necessary for operation of the business. Technology is often protected through patents or trade secrets. In most cases, this can be broken down between two central areas – technology and branding.

article thumbnail

Rising IP Trolling: Urgent Need for Awareness on Legitimate Usage

SpicyIP

The dictionary definition: Trolling is a way to intentionally annoy in order to get attention or cause trouble. In the IP context, trolls are also seen as entities that misleadingly or falsely assert ownership of IP rights, with the intent of making money out of duping people.

IP 104
article thumbnail

marketing may be material even to very expensive/complex business purchases

43(B)log

patent trolls, paid content promoted as ‘unbiased truth,’ and sometimes just blatant lies. Pegasystems argued that its statements that Appian’s total cost of ownership is “higher” couldn’t be literally false because “[h]igher than what is not specified.” “But There was also a triable issue on falsity.