This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Here is our recap of last week’s top IP developments including summary of the posts on the repudiations against personalityrights, Govt. Part II: The Right to Publicity: 31 Years Since Madow’s Scathing Verdict, Yet……. Part III: The Right to Publicity: 31 Years Since Madow’s Scathing Verdict, Yet……. The Show Must Go On?
The development of Artificial Intelligence, from being able to create edited photos to now generating deepfake videos that cannot be distinguished from real videos, has created an imminent threat to intellectual property rights and personalityrights specifically. and includes both commercial and non-commercial aspects.
However, this article will discuss the reasoning of the court with respect to relief claimed by the Plaintiff against a creator of a YouTube video who compiled the interviews of the plaintiff and depicted his personality as ‘thug life’ The plaintiff contended that such videos portrayed him in a derogatory manner. million views.
Here is our recap of last week’s top IP developments including summary of the posts on Delhi High Court’s orders in the Pertuzumab patent dispute, order concerning personalityrights of the Telugu movie star Vishnu Manchu, and Madras High Court’s decision on burden of proof in patent revocation cases.
PART I] PersonalityRights in Spotlight Once More!: India Pride Advisory Order Can a movie carrying the name of a personality be restrained from release citing infringement of personalityrights? PART II] PersonalityRights in Spotlight Once More!: Anything we are missing out on?
Explaining why and how such seemingly innocuous posts infringe on the shooter’s personalityrights, we are pleased to bring to our readers this post by SpicyIP intern Tejas Misra. PersonalityRights: Publicity or Privacy? It can include their face, voice, characteristics and distinctive qualities or attributes.
Additionally, it is right-holder centric favouring authors and encouraging them to control the use of their works in new markets. and others for trademark infringement and passing off of the plaintiffs’ registered mark “DROTIN” by using the deceptively similar mark “DROTOWIN.”
Here is our recap of last weeks top IP developments including summaries of the posts on Lemleys and Hendersons paper on AI Terms of Use Restrictions, CGPDTM order on the removal of a patent agent, Delhi HC order on disclosure of a PhD and Public Interest Need in PersonalityRights cases. Anything we are missing out on?
Comparing the approaches of the Courts vis a vis personalityrights and the right to livelihood, we are pleased to bring to you this guest post by Aditya Bhargava. Comparing the approaches of the Courts vis a vis personalityrights and the right to livelihood, we are pleased to bring to you this guest post by Aditya Bhargava.
SpicyIP Tidbit: Mdecins Sans Frontires suit against Dharma Productions for Jigra scene Mdecins Sans Frontires (MSF) filed a suit against Dharma Productions for using its trademark in the movie Jigra. Read this Tidbit by Md Sabeeh Ahmad discussing MSFs averments and the potential trademark questions that may arise! A liability of Rs.
Case Summaries Abbott Healthcare Private Limited vs Vinsac Pharma on 17 February, 2025 (Delhi High Court) Abbott Healthcare sued two defendants for trademark and copyright infringement, claiming they deceptively copied its well-known LIMCEE Vitamin C tablets by selling LIMEECEE with similar packaging. Read the post for more details.
Taking a Look at Lupin’s Colour TM Application for its Inhalers Image from here On Lupin’s recent colour trademark registrations for its inhalers, Md Sabeeh Ahmad. Sabeeh highlights how these registration can extend Lupin’s monopoly and could affect million’s right to access these essential medicines. C2Sense, Inc v.
When used strategically, social media becomes one of the most powerful tools of digital marketing. With the evolution of social media, the concept of moment marketing has also become increasingly common. But what exactly is moment marketing? However, the concept of moment marketing is not new. PersonalityRights.
If you’re selling your personalityrights, make sure you understand the implications!!! Newspaper Can Talk About “Derby Pies” Without Infringing Trademarks–Rupp v. Doubling (& Tripling) Down on Trademark Protection For Secret Menu Items–In-N-Out v. Case citation : Coscarelli v. Esquared Hosp. , Courier Journal.
Therefore, the need to safeguard one’s name becomes apparent, and Intellectual Property Rights offer a means to address this concern. These affected rights encompass personalityrights, representing a distinctive form of intellectual property that transcends mere financial considerations.
The current statute provides protection of these celebrity rights under trademark law, copyright law as well as passing off action for infringing the said rights. PersonalityRights: Personality is an attribute through which an individual is recognized in the society, depending upon the talent they possess.
Introduction The rights which are granted to the people for their creative work are known as intellectual property rights. They provide the creator a sole, time-limited right to make use of their invention. It penetrates all sectors of the market and has been increasingly crucial in maintaining competitiveness.
Publicity, such as character, reputation and personal brand, will be protected under various statutes, such as the Copyright Act 1957 and the Trade Marks Act 1999. iii] Provisions in Indians Laws Trademarks Act, 1999 does not make any exact provision for publicity rights, but its definition of ‘Marks’ contains names within its ambit.
Case Summaries Anil Kapoor vs Simply Life India & Ors on 20 September, 2023 (Delhi High Court) Image from here The Plaintiff sought protection of his personalityrights, publicity rights and elements associated with his persona like his name, voice, photographs/ likeness, dialogues, manner of dialogue delivery, gestures, signatures.
While the protection of memes remains unclear and unresolved, plaintiffs can claim copyright, trademark, and personalityrights in the underlying images. While one image or video is fixed, collections are constantly changing. Is Infringement Even Possible Then? According to s.3(1)
A Division Bench of the Delhi High Court to hear appeal against the Single Judge order in the Sushant Singh Rajput personalityrights case. FMC faces class action lawsuits by its investors for failing to disclose information about weakening patent protection and subsequent legal defeats in markets like India, China and Brazil.
ABSTRACT There has been a dramatic increase in the commercial use of celebrity personalities by people not authorized to do so compared to the earlier times. Protecting personalityrights has become a growing problem in India due to deepfakes, morphed pictures, etc. Interesting right? Puttaswamy v.
The Indian sports market, especially is a ground for rapid growth, with a die-hard fan base, and an ever-growing hunger for more, the market of sports is at the top of its game. Almost every facet of the sports industry is now being tapped into and marketed and Intellectual Property are valuable assets for these marketing tactics.
Due to the extent of unlawful activity associated with the petitioner’s name and personality, the court granted a restraining order on 25 th November 2022 against various people and companies. What are Publicity Rights? Under this Act, Sec. The definition clause under Sec. Additionally, Sec.
We also came across the Delhi High Court orders on the interplay between the Patents Act and the Competition Act, and on the inheritability of personalityrights. Case Summaries Calcutta High Court restrains the defendant from infringing the unregistered trademark of the respondent Case: Usco S.P.A. Drop us a comment below!
She highlights that the Court refused to afford post mortem protection to personalityrights of the actor. Nishtha emphasises that in determining whether the deceased possessed personalityrights enforceable by his heirs, the Court based its reasoning on the intertwining between privacy and publicity rights.
Here is our recap of last weeks top IP developments including summaries of the posts on Delhi HCs ruling on Celebrity Rights and the Powers of Regional Directors under Companies Act vis a vis Trademark Similarity. The Delhi HC restrained the defendants in both cases from infringing the plaintiffs personalityrights.
In this month’s edition, he looks into topics including the Plant Variety Registry, different tales of/ takes on personalityrights, and multiple leaks of key documents and their contribution in law-making. Institute of Directors v. BSA Business Software Alliance Inc. vs Tube Investments of India Ltd. &
We’ve tried to represent a diversity of subject matter also in this list, so it’s a mixed bag of cases dealing with patents, trademarks, copyright law etc. The Court delineated instances like parody and satire where free speech in the context of well-known persons may be protected. Bolt Technology v. First, in Toyota v.
We’ve tried to represent a diversity of subject matter also in this list, so we have a fair sprinkling of cases dealing with copyright, patents, trademarks, competition law etc. The case clarifies that the bar on arbitrability of trademark disputes is not an absolute one. Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. Jorawer Singh Mundy v.
Regarding personalityrights and introducing a public interest test before granting protection to celebrities, Rebecca Cardoso, in this guest post, advocates for a balanced approach prioritizing protection against genuine harm instead of trivial grievances. Navigating PersonalityRights Does Fame Have a Trade-Off?
Views expressed here are personal.] Ex Parte Orders on PersonalityRights Courts lately have been passing a slew of ex-parte ad interim orders against Generative Artificial Intelligence (‘gen AI’ ) models for training their models using the voices of celebrities, and for producing output that reciprocates the celebrity’s voice.
Image from here The Delhi High Court’s recent interim injunction concerning Anil Kapoor’s personalityrights throws up an important question- should such orders protecting personalityrights overlook the established principles and doctrines? But does the Indian Trademark Act allow such a treatment?
According to a source, the NFTs market in India will increase from $3.3 The issue involved in the case was whether the use of names and images of sportspersons to create digital player cards is a violation of their privacy and publicity rights. Income generated through NFTs is taxed at 30%. billion in 2021 to $27 billion by 2028.
Highlights of the Week Initial Interest Confusion Clash: Forest Essentials Battles Baby Forest at the DHC Image from here Is it still trademark infringement if confusion regarding similar marks doesn’t carry on through to the completion of a transaction? Drop a comment below to let us know.
Voice Clones and Legal Tones: The Intersection of Artificial Intelligence and Posthumous PersonalityRights Bringing the dead back from their grave? The Court concluded that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case and granted the injunction, restraining the defendants from manufacturing, selling, or marketing the products.
Weve tried to represent a diversity of subject matter also in this list, so its a mixed bag of cases dealing with patents, trademarks, copyright law etc. The decision by Punjab and Haryana High Court is also notable for explicitly stating that one needs to be a celebrity to be able to claim personalityrights.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content