This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that a servicemark owner with all of its physical assets located along the Pacific coast could maintain a suit for servicemark infringement against a company using a similar mark, on the same services, whose physical assets were all located along the Atlantic coast.
If you are contemplating registering a servicemark that primarily benefits your company and not others, don’t bother; it will be refused registration. Section 1053 (which, generally, provides that servicemarks used in commerce are registrable like trademarks) and Section 45, 15 U.S.C. The takeaway from CHiP ?
with willful trademark infringement, as well as common law violations under Florida competition, trademark and servicemark laws and violations of Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, charging Musk’s X Corp.
In the mid-1990s William Howard joined the band, and in 1997, Beasley obtained a New Jersey state servicemark for THE EBONYS. 4,170,469 (the ‘469 mark) for THE EBONYS, as a federal trademark. . As the decades wore on, the Ebonys’ popularity faded, though Beasley alleges they performed continuously since their formation.
Introduction A mark represents the institution or company to which it belongs and serves as a means of differentiating goods or services among individuals. Marks can be of various types i.e., word marks, servicemarks, logos, symbols, series marks, etc [1]. 1] Acharya, M. 2022, February 28).
With a focus on EU and US approaches to the issue, Musker suggests arguments that may be useful to litigants in similar situations. Being taken from an actual instance of Canadian litigation, the hypothetical allows Sundara Rajan to address differences in treatment of moral rights between civil law and common law countries.
Without evidence, Game Plan's claim of common law rights was baseless and so the Board considered only its registered servicemark rights. in order to litigate from a changed position." Game Plan could rely only on the filing date of its underlying application (December 28, 2016) as its constructive first use date. 10 (E.D.N.Y.
5-hour Energy [a frequent litigant in this space] sued mainly over trademark infringement, but also alleged false advertising (and trademark dilution). Pennsylvania law imposes on insurers a broad duty to defend lawsuits brought against those they insure.” Likewise, the exclusions were construed in favor of coverage.
Although registration was refused, the opinion explains that there is no per se prohibition on registering marks containing informational content as long as the mark also serves to identify a single commercial source. See, TMEP § 1202.04(b)
In 1997, Beasley obtained a New Jersey state servicemark for THE EBONYS. 4,170,469 [the “’469 mark”]). .” The Ebonys were founded by Beasley in 1969 and achieved some commercial success in the 1970s. Howard joined the band in the mid-1990s and performed with it for several years.
After acquiring the Fort Wayne Rickers stores, Plaintiffs apparently became aware of Defendants’, Get 2 Go , Virk Brothers, LLC, and Charanjit Singh, use of the name and trademarks GET 2 GO in connection with three retail convenience stores in Fort Wayne (the “Infringing Marks”). ServiceMark Registrations, Nos.
‘The Paris Convention’, adopted in March 1883 and revised in the years 1900, 1911, 1925, 1934, 1958, 1967, and 1979, comprehensively addresses “patents, utility models, industrial designs, trademarks, servicemarks, trade names, and geographical indications”. [1]
What is Software-as-a-Service (SAAS)? The rise of cloud servicesmarked a significant shift in how we interact with software. This might include allegations of trademark infringement, copyright infringement, trade and secret theft, data ownership and data licensing, threat letters, and litigation.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content