This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A decade ago, patenttrolls were all the rage in the patent world. If there was a rock-star matter in the patent world, it was the debate over trolls. It got this Kat to wonder: has patenttrolling become such an ""oh so yesterday" subject? PatentTrolls, ?nd
By reintroducing the requirement that inventors submit a miniature working model of their inventions along with their patent, legislators could help to deter patenttrolls, reduce frivolous litigation and support legitimate inventors in protecting their innovations, says Darin Gibby at Kilpatrick.
Litigation is almost always recommended to be avoided , whether because of the sheer amount of time needed to get a court date, the expensive costs for the client and law firm, or the risks associated with receiving an unfavorable judgement. They do not practice, develop, manufacture, or otherwise commercialize the patent.
Merpel does not like this form of taxi Friend of the Kat and Legal Head of Delivery for Gett in Moscow, Konstantin Voropaev has been following some developments out of Kazakhstan relating to an uptick in litigation in the taxi-app space. That patent was canceled by the decision of the Chamber for Patent Disputes.
Judge Colm Connolly in the District of Delaware has been pressing many of the patenttrolls (LLCs that only own 1 asset - the asserted patent with nominal managers who are just strawmen) who sue in his court to reveal the identity of their actual funders and litigation decisionmakers. By: Farella Braun + Martel LLP
And these patent owners who do engage in this type of bad action do the industry a tremendous disservice, because these nefarious actors behave so egregiously that it causes a stain on the entire industry, and sadly it allows for all patent owners to be swept up together.
in which the appellate court overturned the Western District of Missouri’s grant of injunctive relief to Tumey, a patent attorney representing a plaintiff asserting patent claims against Mycroft. On March 4, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued a ruling in Tumey v. Mycroft AI, Inc.
Google’s contribution to the US patent system. Healthy patent systems can sometimes be described as a way to incentivize creative inventions, encourage building on existing ideas, and avoid frivolous litigation. Concern with the US patent system. Source: RPX. Source: RPX.
The term ‘PatentTroll’ originated in 1994 in an educational video by Paula Natasha Chavez called the ‘Patents Video.’ ’ A patenttroll is a term used for describing a company that uses Patent Infringement claims to win arguments and court judgments for profit or to stifle competition.
The T-word, patent “troll,” has been used widely over the past 20 years to negatively predispose potential licensees, lawmakers, the courts, as well Continue reading Words matter.
Litigation business Future Link says the latest version of an antitrust lawsuit in California federal court from Taiwanese chipmaker Realtek over claims of a conspiracy with a different Taiwanese chipmaker to fund purported "patenttroll" lawsuits is just more "litigation over litigation."
Introduction Patenttrolls are entities that do not actively develop their inventions but instead acquire patent rights for obvious inventions to prevent others from working on them or to collect licensing fees. In a way, patenttrolls serve a purpose, much like lawyers.
was named chairman of the House subcommittee overseeing intellectual property on Friday, returning him to a leadership post on a panel where he has been critical of what he has described as abusive litigation by companies he calls "patenttrolls." Darrell Issa, R-Calif.,
This is the latest in the series titled “NPE Showcase,” where we discuss high-volume non-practicing entities (or as some call them, “patenttrolls”). This installment will focus on NPE litigation as a whole, and what to expect in 2023. By: Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Patentlitigation declined significantly in the first quarter of 2023 over the same period in 2022, despite increases in issued patents, the difficulty of Continue reading
From 2013 to 2017 patent suits filed dropped by 35% and stayed that way through 2022. Excluding volume patentlitigation filers, typically non-practicing entities (NPEs) Continue reading
Recent Headlines in the IP World: Mikey Campbell: Apple Challenges PatentTroll Targeting Maps Navigation (Source: Apple Insider). Blake Brittain: Apple Must Face Apple Watch Patent Claims, Fed Circ. Polsinelli – Electrical Engineering & Computer Science Patent Prosecution/ Associate. Affirms (Source: Reuters).
A California federal judge has found that Taiwanese chipmaker Realtek can't use the federal courts to sue one of its major rivals for allegedly using a "bounty" to fund "patenttroll" litigation against it because that doesn't break any federal antitrust laws.
Saturday Opinion: North Carolina’s Abusive Patent Assertions Act survived a constitutional challenge this week because it puts focus where it should be – on bad faith behaviour, not business structure.
It is clear that Mycroft repeatedly announced that it was fighting VoiceTech as a patenttroll and that Mycroft has a strong anti-troll position: I don’t like letting these matters go quietly. Troll Hunter—Mycroft’s Position on PatentTrolls ( February 5, 2020).
In so doing, AG Wasden seeks to defend the constitutionality of a 2014 Idaho statute, the Bad Faith Assertions of Patent Infringement Act (BFAPIA), which, among other things, requires patent-owning companies to put up a bond covering litigation costs if defendants can demonstrate a reasonable likelihood the suit was in bad faith.
VirnetX is a classic example of an NPE that does not qualify as a “patenttroll.” Patenttrolls leverage the litigation system to negotiate settlements for less than the cost of defending against a lawsuit. VirnetX, on the other hand, licenses its patents for eight and sometimes nine figures.
This is the latest in the series titled “NPE Showcase,” where we discuss high-volume non-practicing entities (or as some call them, “patenttrolls”). The District of Delaware has long been a favorite venue for patenttrolls across the country. District Court for the District of Delaware.
With patenttrolls accounting for more than half of all U.S. patentlitigation annually, the country needs commonsense reforms that allow innovators and entrepreneurs to bring their products to market free of meritless legal actions, says former Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va.
While banks and financial institutions have long been the subject of patent lawsuits, they have been increasingly targeted this year by a number of non-practicing entities. Non-practicing entities are those that acquire patents but do not actually practice the patented inventions. By: Thompson Coburn LLP
Individuals and companies commonly engage in the strategic purchasing of critical blocking patent portfolios. For example, the rise of patenttrolls, who litigate cheaply-bought patents, use the IP system as a legal weapon. Moreover, damage demands in litigation cases involving IP are rising.
Counsel say that while it’s good to see the state taking on a 'predatory patenttroll', the outcome of the case won’t change their own litigation strategies
This is the latest in the series titled “NPE Showcase,” where we discuss high-volume non-practicing entities (or as some call them, “patenttrolls”). Technologies is similar to other NPEs, asserting two patents against well-known companies for technology that has been around since the turn of the millennium.
A number of small providers are receiving patent demand letters with a settlement or licensing offer to avoid litigation. Many of these letters are a typical part of the playbook of entities that have been variously called “non-practicing entities” (NPEs) or “patenttrolls.” How should you respond? Should you respond?
Saturday Opinion: North Carolina’s Abusive Patent Assertions Act survived a constitutional challenge this week because it puts focus where it should be – on bad faith behaviour, not business structure.
This is the latest in the series titled “NPE Showcase,” where we discuss high-volume non-practicing entities (or as some call them, “patenttrolls”). This installment will focus on NPE litigation as a whole, and what to expect in 2023. 6] Why is patentlitigation so tied to the capital markets?
In the present case, these trolls using the name of these firms are misrepresenting themselves to gain profits out of it. Such scams may work due to the fear of litigation and the reputation of these big law firms. As ‘content’ becomes ubiquitous around us, the potential for these quick scams rises as well.
It simply cannot make any sense for all patents to become increasingly worthless simply because of the victimization of large multinational corporations who are incapable of crafting a strategy that solves the nuisance litigation problem that does not destroy the entire system.
Udupa, whose appointment was announced in December, comes to the USPTO after serving the last seven years as the head of litigation for Hewlett Packard Enterprise, where she was responsible for heading HPE’s intellectual property litigation and formulating case strategies.
This is the latest in the series titled “NPE Showcase,” where we discuss high-volume non-practicing entities (or as some call them, “patenttrolls”). This installment will focus on a court where many patenttrolls file suit, the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. What about NPEs?
Yesterday’s decision in favour of PanOptis by an Eastern District of Texas jury was the consequence of significant investments made by the firm over many years.
Promotion of innovation and artistic creation or, at least, the mitigation of obstacles posed by the potential litigation during the innovation and creation process. Reduction of abusive proceedings : IP litigation has witnessed a proliferation of claims aimed at obtaining revenues by leveraging the deterrent effect of high litigation costs.
On September 30, 2016, a federal jury in Texas ordered Apple to pay $302 million in damages to VirnetX for violating two of its patents, including patented software used in Apple’s FaceTime and iMessage applications.
It didn’t take long for the accusations of patent “trolling” to come out, but King Digital released a statement that they were merely trying to protect their brand name for the upcoming future. The post Creator of Candy Crush Saga Backs Off on Trademark Registration appeared first on Greenspoon Marder LLP.
This is the latest in the series titled “NPE Showcase,” where we discuss high-volume non-practicing entities (or as some call them, “patenttrolls”). Non-practicing entities, by their very nature, have few assets other than the patents asserted in a lawsuit.
He suggests that the standard might need to change in instances where AI is used for patent examination, as what is “obvious” to an AI might not be obvious to a human. Impact on PatentLitigation and Licensing : Yuri predicts that AI could reduce the number of contested patents and therefore the amount of litigation.
This is the latest in the series titled “NPE Showcase,” where we discuss high-volume non-practicing entities (or as some call them, “patenttrolls”). The challenge would fail despite the weakness of the patent and result in nothing but wasted attorneys’ fees.
Yesterday’s decision in favour of PanOptis by an Eastern District of Texas jury was the consequence of significant investments made by the firm over many years.
In the wake of the collapse of the Internet bubble circa 2000, a public outcry about patenttrolls caught the attention of Congress and the federal courts. A wild mix of reforms of the patent system resulted between about 2005 and 2015. "Burst Bubble." by jcgoforth is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 Sometimes Congress did [.].
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content