This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Enrico Schaefer, Copyright & Litigation Attorney. Even in situations where a business owner contracts a third-party webdesigner to build their website, both the business and the webdesigner can be held liable for copyrights violated if they are used on your website. Infringement can be willful or accidental.
Fluent is a marketing company that generates leads. The court even finds fault with the way the hyperlink is presented: A webdesigner must do more than simply underscore the hyperlinked text in order to ensure that it is sufficiently ‘set apart’ from surrounding text. The underlying case is a putative TCPA class action.
Some of them described themselves and why they read the blog: “A senior director on our legal team forwarded one of your blog posts to a few of us on the litigation team a few days into me starting in-house. ” “Im a litigator often specializing in internet law related issues, particularly under Section 230.
Elenis about whether webdesigners can freely reject prospective customers I expect the Supreme Court will ultimately take the 5th and 11th Circuit appeals in the Texas (NetChoice v. Google about Section 230 Twitter v. Taamneh about the Anti-Terrorism Act Counterman v. Paxton) and Florida (NetChoice v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content