This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
I never blogged the dual state and federal rulings in the SocialMedia Addiction cases from last Fall. I can’t easily track the state court litigation, but the federal litigation is a sight to behold. Case Citation : In re SocialMedia Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation , No.
Today, I’m covering AB 2408, a performative “protect kids online” bill that kick kids off socialmedia entirely and ruin the Internet for adults too. This will be a major shock to millions of Californians who value and enjoy socialmedia. Monday, I covered AB 2273, the Age-Appropriate Design Code.
This is a case focusing on ownership of socialmedia accounts. See “ SocialMedia Ownership Disputes Part II: Bridal Wear Company Takes Back Control of Instagram Account from Ex-Employee ” and “ Another Confused Entry in the SocialMedia Account Ownership Jurisprudence–JLM v. (See Teamsters Loc.
The bill applies to “socialmedia platforms” that: “(A) Construct a public or semipublic profile within a bounded system created by the service. (B) ” This definition of “socialmedia” has been around for about a decade, and it’s awful. Who’s Covered by the Bill?
The last time we blogged this case , the district court had sided with JLM, initially restricting Gutman’s use of the socialmedia accounts and then awarding control over the accounts to JLM. What does a 200+ year old fox have to say about who owns socialmedia accounts?). ” (Cite to Pierson v.
The Texas socialmedia censorship law remains temporarily enjoined by the Fifth Circuit pending Supreme Court review, but Davis couldn’t wait. Davis claimed that Texas’ socialmedia censorship law preempted the TOS venue clause. [FN: That was presumably the number when the complaint was filed.
All of the submitters are repeat players from the Florida litigation. This is why I see the Texas and Florida litigation as a generational battle over the Internet’s soul–and the future of free speech. Paxton, the Challenge to Texas’ SocialMedia Censorship Law appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
Her latest trash lawsuit claimed that socialmedia, the government, and Procter & Gamble were all doing the RICO against her. With respect to the socialmedia services’ status as publishers, the court says: the plaintiff’s RICO claims depend on Twitter and Facebook’s acting as publishers. The complaint.
The opinion holds that the key parts of Florida’s socialmedia censorship law (SB 7072) likely violate the First Amendment and should remain enjoined. ” The opinion also highlights the madness of the Fifth Circuit allowing the Texas socialmedia censorship law to take effect via a 1-line order. “S.B.
Plaintiffs CAN’T WAIT to sue Internet services using the Texas socialmedia censorship law. Nevertheless, the plaintiffs argued that the law “evidences a strong public policy to protect Texans from wrongful censorship on socialmedia platforms.” appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
“Influencer Marketing” and “SocialMedia Brand Endorsement” have become big business. Our law firm represents some of the business’s largest socialmediamarketing agencies and influencers. This means they also own and need to license the copyright to the brand.
” Market effect: “Townsquare’s article reporting on the original Jordan video similarly contained that original video as part of an embedded post from X, including additional text and images from the X post, and there is thus little to no risk of market usurpation.” Lynk Media LLC v. IHeartMedia, Inc.,
Earlier this year, the Texas legislature enacted HB 20 , a blatant attempt to censor socialmedia service. The opinion emphatically slices through the FUD that’s been generated by pro-censorial forces questioning whether socialmedia services exercise editorial discretion. The Opinion. ” [cite to USTA v.
Michael Christin, another trial attorney at the DoJ, went into great detail on the Jetflix case, discussing various challenges his team faced while litigating the case. “Market entry for a pirate is easy. They’re paying influencers to go on socialmedia and promote them.
Marketing. * 2, 2022): Nor does personal jurisdiction arise out of the Film Defendants’ so-called “advertising strategy,” which allegedly “featured a significant push on socialmedia[ ] targeting Washington, DC residents via Instagram and Facebook.” targeted socialmedia advertising. Comptroller , No.
Trends in Litigation Against Big Tech. It is a challenge for the institutional framework, enforcement agencies, and courts to effectively develop their missions, because, even with the current resources, some markets remain unexplored or wrongly understood. What is the approach of antitrust laws in these markets? In Colombia.
A couple of years ago, Florida and Texas passed “socialmedia censorship” laws. The laws were not subtle–the bill titles literally told the world that the legislatures were censoring socialmedia. NetChoice appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
Not only does fashion enjoy very limited copyright protection in the United States, but Stein is a Chinese company, making any litigation even more difficult. Examples of this can be found almost every time a dress or fashion accessory becomes popular, whether on socialmedia or at various events. Bottom Line.
On the same day last week, federal judges in the Southern District of New York issued a pair of decisions that highlight the persistent legal uncertainty publishers and websites in the Second Circuit face when embedding content from socialmedia platforms. Townsquare Media, Inc. Townsquare Media, Inc. In Richardson v.
Chicken Joe’s, an Albany NY-based restaurant “reposted” @WGNAFM’s post, which apparently included the photo in question, to its “socialmedia” page. Breitbart , the court says that “reposting” on “socialmedia” is enough to find copyright infringement in a default judgment.
It has cratered into a fireball of litigation that doomed the restaurant chain (e.g., It’s so complicated that the judge made an appendix recapping the status of dozens of claims: This post focuses on a sliver of the sprawling litigation empire. Esquared appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
In the mid-2010s, plaintiffs filed about 20 lawsuits filed around the country seeking to hold socialmedia services liable for allegedly facilitating terrorist attacks. After 8 years of litigation, the case ends on essentially a procedural technicality (an important one, but still…). Two of those cases, Gonzalez v.
Skiplagged’s defense also highlighted its website’s disclaimers, which warned users that hidden city ticketing “may upset the airline” and marketed itself as exposing fares airlines “don’t want you to see.” A good example comes from a case I litigated years ago on behalf of Costco.
The victims sued socialmedia companies for allegedly radicalizing the shooter by exposing him to third-party content. Mean appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. You may recall the 2022 Buffalo mass-shooting , which was committed by a murderer responding to the “ Great Replacement Theory.”
CNN argued that the Flynns’ socialmedia activity shows they in fact are QAnon adherents. Still, given the possible dog whistles, I’m sure CNN’s lawyers will explore these socialmedia statements in their depositions. CNN appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. The post Retweets ?
Defendants also managed the socialmedia presence of the “La Baguette” business, which primarily consisted of a Facebook page. Moore, Find Out Who Your Friends Are: A Framework for Determining Whether Employees’ SocialMedia Followers Follow Them to A New Job, 39 CAMPBELL L. See generally, Christopher A.
Pinterest heads to the Ninth Circuit next week to defend a lower court ruling that allowed the company to use the Digital Millennium Copyright Act to shield itself from copyright litigation over how it markets images that users upload to the socialmedia site.
Last week, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals dissolved the existing injunction against Texas HB 20, the so-called socialmedia censorship law, in a one-sentence order. The post My SCOTUS Amicus Brief on Texas HB20’s Unconstitutional Transparency Requirements appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
” Most courts have rejected the fair use defense that secondary usages provide beneficial marketing for the copyright owner. .” ” Most courts have rejected the fair use defense that secondary usages provide beneficial marketing for the copyright owner. ” Amount Taken. Implications.
However, those arguments were more theoretical than empirical; there weren’t a lot of high-profile examples of a mass-market consumer service deploying this strategy. 4) Socialmedia “defective design” lawsuits go forward. Battles over politician-operated socialmedia accounts. StopTheSADScheme.
This case also highlights the stakes of the individualized explanations requirement in the TX and FL socialmedia censorship laws if those survive constitutional scrutiny. Google appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Note that determining if a content item is CSAM isn’t always a zero or one.
Rule 40 restricts socialmedia posts and advertisements published by athletes and sponsors during the Games, both in volume and content. As socialmedia posts generate buzz and draw fans, spectators will have a chance to enjoy getting behind-the-scenes looks and instant updates from their favourite athletes.
First, Voyager Labs allegedly created “thousands of fake accounts to scrape, then sell, platform users’ socialmedia data.” — I suspect we’re entering an era of nuance when it comes to web-scraping litigation. Voyager (Guest Blog Post) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
Today I’m blogging about one of those bills, California AB 2408 , “Socialmedia platform: child users: addiction.” This bill assumes that socialmedia platforms are intentionally addicting kids, so it creates business-ending liability to thwart those alleged addictions. SocialMedia Benefits Minors.
Instead, they focus on whether Westlaw’s headnotes were copyrightable, whether Rosss training-stage copying involved protectable expression, and whether its use displaced a real or potential market for Thomson Reuters’ original workssome of the same issues that will be decided in cases involving generative AI.
Knowing well that litigation in the Northern District of Texas is not in its best interests, TPG filed a declaratory judgment in Delaware hoping to take advantage of the first-to-file rule. With all that, the first battle in this litigation will be the question of where to litigate it. Power Ventures, Inc. Facebook v.
That legal standard could devastate socialmedia usage in Australia. It increases the risk that ordinary socialmedia users could be liable for defamation caused by their so-called friends. That risk encourages socialmedia users to actively police the comments of their friends–or stop posting entirely.
Bell continues to market his 1982 72-page book, and also sells merchandise, “including t-shirts and posters that display the passage that was quoted in the tweets.” Anyway, Bell goes around suing unauthorized users of the passage, mostly public schools or nonprofits that publish the passage on socialmedia.
A screenshot from the (now deleted) socialmedia video at the center of the controversy. Effect on the market : Atari alleged that it has an active licensing business extending its brand into advertising, merchandising, and other areas. Socialmedia doing what it does best.
” This is the latest entry in the confusing jurisprudence about when 230 applies to first-party marketing representations that are rendered untrue by users’ activities. However, this case’s litigation approach is problematic. Snap appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Despite Doe v.
Create trademark alerts for your main brands, block them on Google, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and other socialmedia. Request verification of your account from socialmedia. Many cases remain under the radar if you do not have local counsel helping you know the market.
The rulings should put a decisive end to the genre of lawsuits over socialmedia supporting terrorists; and the Twitter ruling will cast a negative shadow over other cases alleging that socialmedia services facilitate illegal activity. ” Those cases were poorly framed and litigated at every step along the way.
Twitter, over whether socialmedia services can violate the Anti-Terrorism Act. Paxton, over the Florida and Texas socialmedia censorship laws. ” The brief explains how Section 230 provides important procedural benefits in litigation that promote pro-speech outcomes. NetChoice v.
Introduction In today’s digital economy, trademarks play an important role in developing a brand’s identity, establishing customer trust, and assuring market competition. The accessibility of Internet markets and the ease with which information may be shared have given rise to new opportunities for trademark infringement.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content