This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
There are two critically important cases over “socialmedia addiction” pending in California state court and as an MDL in the federal Northern District of California. It is an all-out brawl in federal court, with no-expense-spared battles over each and every picayune litigation issue.
The bill applies to “socialmedia platforms” that: “(A) Construct a public or semipublic profile within a bounded system created by the service. (B) ” This definition of “socialmedia” has been around for about a decade, and it’s awful. Who’s Covered by the Bill?
The last time we blogged this case , the district court had sided with JLM, initially restricting Gutman’s use of the socialmedia accounts and then awarding control over the accounts to JLM. What does a 200+ year old fox have to say about who owns socialmedia accounts?). ” (Cite to Pierson v.
With respect to the Jordan video, I assume the video was infringing when uploaded to Twitter, which is why a license argument wouldn’t work. Those licenses were explicitly and unambiguously laid out in YouTube’s Terms of Service, and the sublicense clearly extends to embedding the video. Lynk Media LLC v.
The Texas socialmedia censorship law remains temporarily enjoined by the Fifth Circuit pending Supreme Court review, but Davis couldn’t wait. Davis claimed that Texas’ socialmedia censorship law preempted the TOS venue clause. [FN: That was presumably the number when the complaint was filed. July 26, 2023).
Each of these lawsuits involved a familiar scenario, putting Hadid squarely in the “ I got sued for posting pictures of myself on socialmedia ” club—a club that’s now about as exclusive as a Sam’s Club membership. But this time, Hadid didn’t settle or litigate. She didn’t even hire a lawyer.
Right of Publicity Resources: The right of publicity is generally defined as an individual’s right to control and profit from the commercial use of his/her name, likeness and persona, which shall be referred to in this article as the “individual’s identity” Right of publicity for socialmedia influencers.
Both sides took to socialmedia, with Dash claiming that “You have to lose some battles to win a war… Stay tuned” hinting at a possible appeal. For a time, Malibu Media was one of the most prolific copyright litigants in the world. A jury has now ruled in that case and sided with Muddy Water Pictures.
Plaintiffs CAN’T WAIT to sue Internet services using the Texas socialmedia censorship law. Nevertheless, the plaintiffs argued that the law “evidences a strong public policy to protect Texans from wrongful censorship on socialmedia platforms.” But surprise! I hope it doesn’t.
“Influencer Marketing” and “SocialMedia Brand Endorsement” have become big business. Our law firm represents some of the business’s largest socialmedia marketing agencies and influencers. This means they also own and need to license the copyright to the brand.
On the same day last week, federal judges in the Southern District of New York issued a pair of decisions that highlight the persistent legal uncertainty publishers and websites in the Second Circuit face when embedding content from socialmedia platforms. Townsquare Media, Inc. Lynk Media v. In Richardson v.
( head nod to Judge Friendly ). * * * The plaintiff licenses a photo database to grocery stores for $12k/yr. Chicken Joe’s, an Albany NY-based restaurant “reposted” @WGNAFM’s post, which apparently included the photo in question, to its “socialmedia” page. All excellent points.
In the decade since the America Invents Act (AIA) was enacted, patent licensing challenges have increased for many technology companies and independent inventors. From the perspective of the Intangible Investor, 2022 will be a year of new opportunities and transitional growth. grants for the first half of 2021.
Posting copyrighted images or photos on your website or socialmedia. Using a copyrighted song, or portion of a song, in a presentation, at an event, on your website, or on socialmedia. Modifying an image or photo and using it in a presentation, brochure, on your website, or on socialmedia.
.” F1 Delta Time lost its trademark license to use F1 / Formula One as part of the F1 Delta Time game. The brand licensing deal apparently had a ‘term’ that expired. F1 did not renew the license. Did the initial NFT buyers even know their NFT license was subject to an upstream license that might expire?
Unfortunately, the mere threat of litigation can be just as effective as an actual lawsuitand a whole lot cheaper. Sherlock Holmes and the Case of the Overstretched Copyright Even when claims to copyright protection are weak, the threat of litigation is often enough to make small organizations back down. copyright law.
They claimed that Meta, on its socialmedia platforms, has stolen hundreds of their content. Influencer culture and, by extension, content creation on socialmedia, has become increasingly prevalent in recent years. It is interesting that Meta has not taken precautions against such expensive litigation.
In Chapter 4, Beatriz Conde Gallego debates whether owners of standard-essential patents (SEPs) must grant licences in “license to all” or “access to all” approaches. Giuseppe Mazziotti examines, in Chapter 8, the solutions to online music licensing, adopted by the EU.
On the first, substantial litigation has already been launched concerning whether the data used to train these models requires payment or opt-in from creatives whose work has been ingested, often without consent. Is it a proper copyright ownership or an assigned license? If output works infringe copyright, who is responsible (e.g.
But by providing a foil in litigation against both the Center for Countering Digital Hate (“CCDH”) and Bright Data (the world’s largest seller of scraped data), he’s given judges in the most important district court in the country for tech legal issues, the Northern District of California, plenty of motivation to rule against him.
First, this wasn’t a typical pro se suit; actual licensed lawyers were involved. Two More Courts Tell Litigants That SocialMedia Services Aren’t State Actors. Anti-Zionist Loses Lawsuit Over SocialMedia Account Suspensions–Martillo v. Are SocialMedia Services “State Actors” or “Common Carriers”?
A screenshot from the (now deleted) socialmedia video at the center of the controversy. Effect on the market : Atari alleged that it has an active licensing business extending its brand into advertising, merchandising, and other areas. Socialmedia doing what it does best.
Create trademark alerts for your main brands, block them on Google, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and other socialmedia. Request verification of your account from socialmedia. Take advantage on this to request purchasing licenses. Authorities are always curious about your products.
If the case stands on appeal, Twitter will write a check to CCDH to compensate it for the litigation harms Twitter has imposed on it. Anti-SLAPP laws are a crucial bulwark against such abuses, especially by billionaires who embrace Pyrrhic litigation with the goal of draining their opponents’ bank accounts. We need more of that.
Defendants also managed the socialmedia presence of the “La Baguette” business, which primarily consisted of a Facebook page. Moore, Find Out Who Your Friends Are: A Framework for Determining Whether Employees’ SocialMedia Followers Follow Them to A New Job, 39 CAMPBELL L. See generally, Christopher A.
IPKat readers interested in copyright are well aware of how, over the past several years, the right of communication to the public has gained a top spot in litigation and case law. Pinterest allows users to upload images (“pins”) and share them with other users. Background In the Hamburg case (case No. 3(1) of the Copyright Directive ).
When the alleged infringement involves a chunk that could qualify for copyright protection on a standalone basis, those courts usually consider the standalone licensing market for that chunk and say the purported marketing activity still requires a license. Implications.
Bell allegedly offers licenses for its use. Anyway, Bell goes around suing unauthorized users of the passage, mostly public schools or nonprofits that publish the passage on socialmedia. The passage is “separately copyrighted,” by which I take it the court means “separately registered.” But that’s not plausible.
Implications This is surely not the last word on the subject because Shah litigated pro se. For a more convincing ruling, we need to see how a well-trained copyright litigator navigates this legal issue. Still, its implications are wide-ranging. This case covers similar ground as the uncited Hubay v.
This was announced without acquiring the IP from the roller derby team and without securing any sort of coexistence agreement or license. It also has a reasonable argument that consumers may ultimately be confused when they are deciding to visit one of the team’s websites or looking to tag one of the teams on socialmedia.
2, 2022): Nor does personal jurisdiction arise out of the Film Defendants’ so-called “advertising strategy,” which allegedly “featured a significant push on socialmedia[ ] targeting Washington, DC residents via Instagram and Facebook.” targeted socialmedia advertising. Parker, 2022 WL 17403220 (D.D.C.
First, Voyager Labs allegedly created “thousands of fake accounts to scrape, then sell, platform users’ socialmedia data.” — I suspect we’re entering an era of nuance when it comes to web-scraping litigation. a UK-based surveillance company. — The opinion was short and focused on a few key facts.
The court recognized that artists routinely create rough versions of new works before seeking licenses, and that restricting this practice would limit creativity and stifle innovation in the music industry. He also questioned whether Thomson Reuters would actually use or license its data for AI training. Ross Intelligence, Inc.
This case also highlights the stakes of the individualized explanations requirement in the TX and FL socialmedia censorship laws if those survive constitutional scrutiny. (We don’t know if this is a false positive, but obviously the user claims it is and cares enough to take it to court).
“Embedding” means the process of copying unique HTML code assigned to the location of a digital copy of the photo or video published to the Internet, and the insertion of that code into a target webpage or socialmedia post so that photo or video is linked for display within the target post.
Knowing well that litigation in the Northern District of Texas is not in its best interests, TPG filed a declaratory judgment in Delaware hoping to take advantage of the first-to-file rule. With all that, the first battle in this litigation will be the question of where to litigate it. Power Ventures, Inc. Facebook v.
” * In re: Marriott International Customer Data Security Breach Litig., ” * In re Waste Management Data Breach Litigation, 2022 WL 561734 (SDNY Feb. The same rule applies to communications in-person or by letter, email, or telephone, or through socialmedia, such as Facebook. 2022 WL 822925 (D. Gershfeld v.
To my knowledge, the only litigated case that resulted in a 512(f) win was Online Policy Group v. To settle that dispute, the parties worked out an “exclusive” license: the second-comer could sell the design on Amazon, and the registrant could keep selling it on eBay. Diebold from 2004, which led to a $125k damages award.
In the decade since the adoption of the America Invents Act (AIA) patent licensing has become more arduous for many technology companies and independent inventors. Continue reading.
Those arguments were that (1) Take-Two’s use of the tattoos was authorized by an implied license, (2) the fair use doctrine insulates their utilization of the tattoos and (3) the tattoos constitute a de minimis part of the video game. Take Two had good reason to believe in its implied license defense.
Will California Clone-and-Revise Some Terrible Ideas from Florida/Texas’ SocialMedia Censorship Laws? Big Ruling for Free Speech: Most of Florida’s SocialMedia Censorship Law (SB 7072) Remains Enjoined–NetChoice v. Wouldn’t It Be Great if Internet Services Had To License Technologies Selected by Hollywood?
Other Posts DHC strikes the Right Chord Clarifying that a Pending Compulsory License Application Will Not Justify Allegedly Infringing Activity to Continue In a big relief for PPL, the DHC by two back to back orders clarified that a pending compulsory license application will not justify unauthorised use of sound recordings.
Here is our recap of last weeks top IP developments including summaries of the posts on Indias Top IP Developments in 2024, a potential trade secret litigation at the Delhi HC and Screenwriters Rights Association of Indias registration as Copyright Society. This and a lot more in this weeks SpicyIP Weekly Review.
Image Sources: Shutterstock] The earliest examples of unsolicited sharing of works without proper licensing pertains to the development of Napster in the early 21 st century. obtained without express due permission from the license holder). They believe in subscription-based music sales that don’t include direct (i.e.,
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content