This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In early June, the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law ’s Center for Intellectual Property, Information, and Privacy Law organized and hosted its 12th Annual Ethics in the Practice of IP Law virtual seminar. The Seminar also discussed implicit bias in the practice of IP. The program for the Seminar can be found here.
The school of Legal studies of the Neotia University, Kolkata and the Patent Promotion and IP cell, TNU took an interest in organising a one-day seminar on Innovation and challenges in Intellectual property Rights: Recent trends in Research and Entrepreneurship in collaboration with Biswajit Sarkar Advocates and IP Attorneys.
Back in October, University of Illinois Chicago School of Law’s Center for Intellectual Property (“IP”), Information, and Privacy Law organized and virtually hosted its International IP Practice Seminar. Adam Ernette (UIC) reports on the seminar. Lisa Jorgenson, spoke at the Seminar’s featured session.
WIPO PCT-Madrid Roving Seminars 2025 The Indian Patent Office, along with WIPO, is organising Roving Seminars at six different locations as a part of WIPOs efforts to promote awareness regarding IP protection and innovation globally through the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and the Madrid System. Read the post for more details.
Mashelkar, Patents, Industry Funding, and Bias : In August of 2009, Prashant wrote about the Government of India’s acceptance of the conclusions of the Mashelkar Committee Report. Basheer’s contextualization and Prashant’s clarification on the report.) This fact was explicitly acknowledged in the report.
First, EP 873 was held prima facie invalid based on a lack of inventiveness. However, Mylan also relied on the fact that EP 2 137 537, the parent patent of EP 873, had been revoked for lack of inventive step by the Opposition Division of the EPO. But patience is rewarded.
Below are a few leaders who, through their innovation, expertise, and entrepreneurship, have made a significant contribution to the Commerce Department’s mission to drive business expansion and economic growth and accelerate American leadership in the areas of disaster science, invention, and entrepreneurship. from disasters and failures.
Letter from different countries , 8 Nov 2024 UCL IBIL seminar: Patent Law – Fit for an (emotional) AI age?: In other news, a new report has been published by the EPO looking at patent applications originating from universities. IESEG school of management, Design protection in the fashion field. Deadline 15 Nov 2024.
Royal Society of Chemistry Law Group - Intellectual Property Law Seminar 2024 (26 November 2024) The Royal Society of Chemistry Law Group is hosting its annual Intellectual Property Law Seminar in London on 26 November. Event Report: The UPC One Year On: What Do We Know Now? For further information and to register, click here.
The Court confirmed that a combination of active ingredients could be considered a new product under Article 3(c) and meet Article 3(a) requirements if it falls under the basic patents invention. Alessandro Cerri reported on a Dutch court ruling clarifying that an opt-out from the EUs TDM exception must be machine-readable.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content