Remove Invention Remove Personality Rights Remove Settlement
article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (March 24 – March 30)

SpicyIP

PART I] Personality Rights in Spotlight Once More!: India Pride Advisory Order Can a movie carrying the name of a personality be restrained from release citing infringement of personality rights? PART II] Personality Rights in Spotlight Once More!: Anything we are missing out on?

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (September 18- September 24)

SpicyIP

On one hand, they can lead to an amicable settlement between the parties and prevent lengthy litigations. The defendant asserted that the invention lacked novel hardware and was primarily software-based, making it ineligible for patent protection. What’s the best way forward? Lokesh discusses the case in this short tidbit post.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (May 13- May 19) 

SpicyIP

The patent was rejected by the Deputy Controller on the grounds that the application did not provide exact ratio pesticide and safener being used and for lack of inventive steps. emphasizing on person skilled in the art. The five-step inquiry into inventive step, as outlined in the latter case was also referred. v Cipla Ltd.,

article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2024

SpicyIP

T Series And Another vs M/S Dreamline Reality Movies on 22 February [Punjab and Haryana High Court] The case concerned the adaptation of late Jaswinder Kaurs biography into a cinematographic film and deals with interplay of copyright with personality rights. The judgement was passed by Justice Rajbir Sehrawat. Ericsson v.

IP 105