Remove Intellectual Property Remove Inventor Remove Seminar
article thumbnail

7 Key Takeaways - The Federal Circuit's New § 112 Attack on Biotechnology: Diagnosis and Prescription

JD Supra Law

Kilpatrick attorneys Yifan Mao and Stuart Pollack recently attended the 20th annual KTIPS (Kilpatrick Townsend Intellectual Property Seminar) to discuss the “The Federal Circuit’s New § 112 Attack on Biotechnology: Diagnosis and Prescription.” This new case law now requires that inventors. By: Kilpatrick

article thumbnail

Can We Patent An Idea That Made To Public?

Intepat

’ moment, inventors tend to get excited about sharing it with the world. The Intellectual Property Office grants patents to encourage new technology, development, and scientific research. So, it is a big ‘No’ if you are looking to share your idea in any form of seminars, conferences, or social media platforms.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

[Conference Report] Patents, truth, PCT and more at the UIC School of Law International IP Practice Seminar

The IPKat

Back in October, University of Illinois Chicago School of Law’s Center for Intellectual Property (“IP”), Information, and Privacy Law organized and virtually hosted its International IP Practice Seminar. Adam Ernette (UIC) reports on the seminar. Lisa Jorgenson, spoke at the Seminar’s featured session.

article thumbnail

Sunday Surprises

The IPKat

GIs Workshop The Institute for Information Law at the University of Amsterdam is organising a seminar on the new legislation on geographical indications (GIs). A total of 213 persons responded, including inventors IP lawyers, educators and policymakers. The webinar will take place on December 14, 2023. For details, click here.

article thumbnail

AI & IP: asking the questions

Intellectual Property Office Blog

We have held a series of seminars and roundtables with innovative industry, IP experts and academia working with the Office for AI, Tech Nation, AI Council and Turing Institute to explore these questions.?? reject two UK patent applications that named the AI system, DABUS, as inventor. If yes, how should they be protected?? .

IP 59
article thumbnail

Friday Fantasies

The IPKat

At the close of 2023, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom handed down its eagerly awaited and widely publicized judgment in Thaler v Comptroller-General confirming that a patent application may not name an AI machine as an inventor. So for those beloved folks, this article in Cycling Weekly will really hit the spot.

IP 69
article thumbnail

PRESS RELEASE: Atlanta Wins USPTO Southeast Regional Office: A Leap in Innovation and Growth

LexBlog IP

The office’s proximity to individual inventors, small businesses, veterans, low-income populations, students, rural populations, and groups traditionally underrepresented in patent filings ensures that a diverse range of innovators will benefit from tailored educational programs.