Intellectual Property Law Blog

OCTOBER 8, 2021

A recent court decision on whether an AI system can be named an inventor in a patent application provides a compelling reason for stakeholders in the artificial intelligence industry to respond to the request. patent law to accommodate and encourage technologies that will drive the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

Inventor 189

Inventor Patent Invention Technology 189

IIPRD

JANUARY 7, 2025

One of the main areas of intellectual property law development is the link between artificial intelligence and intellectual property rights (IPRs). Growing AI-related business activity, early case law, and legislative and international policy activities are making it more and more relevant in practice.

IP 98

IP Intellectual Property Invention Inventor 98

Patently-O

JANUARY 20, 2023

Hrdy, Professor of Intellectual Property Law at University of Akron School of Law, and Daniel H. Brean, Senior In-House Intellectual Property Counsel, Respiratory Care, Philips. Are inventions described in works of science fiction patentable? Guest post by Camilla A. See [link]. Compare 35 U.S.C. §

Patent Law 96

Patent Law Law Inventor Patent 96

SpicyIP

OCTOBER 1, 2024

founded in 1993 is a full service Intellectual Property firm manned with professionals in and specializes in the practice of Intellectual Property Laws including Patents, Trademarks, Industrial Designs, Copyright, Trade secrets. About Our Exclusive Knowledge Partner S. Majumdar & Co.,

Registration 103

Registration Intellectual Property IP Patent Drafting 103

IPilogue

NOVEMBER 1, 2021

In July 2021, the Federal Court of Australia affirmed in Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879 that artificial intelligence (AI) systems may be deemed “inventors” under Australian patent law. Third, nothing in the Act dictates the contrary conclusion.”. Firstly, Kim et al. However, Kim et al.

Inventor 111

Inventor Patent Invention Intellectual Property 111

Intellectual Property Law Blog

FEBRUARY 14, 2024

Such AI-assisted inventions present a new set of legal issues under patent law. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a long-anticipated Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted Inventions. On February 13, 2024, the U.S. 101 and 115. Conclusion AI-assisted inventions come with their own set of legal risks.

Inventor 130

Inventor Invention Patent Design 130

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

MARCH 1, 2024

A patent is a legal document that provides exclusive rights to inventors over others in making, using, and selling their inventions for usually 20 years from the date of filling the patent application. Who can file a patent application? Product patent- This law is important for providing safeguards to products.

Patent 105

Patent Inventor Invention Intellectual Property 105

LexBlog IP

JULY 31, 2023

AI and IP Law: Podcast with Yuri Eliezer by Yuri L. Eliezer AI and Intellectual Property Law An Insightful Discussion with Yuri Eliezer The intersection of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Intellectual Property (IP) Law is becoming increasingly significant in the dynamic landscape of technology and innovation.

Law 52

Law IP Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Law 52

Canadian Intellectual Property Blog

NOVEMBER 23, 2020

The aim of this series of short articles is to debunk these common myths around patent protection. Patent Myth #5: Even if my invention is in an early stage of development, I can still file a “quick and dirty” U.S. provisional application A U.S. Despite the fact that the formality requirements for U.S.

Patent Application 52

Patent Application Patent Inventor Invention 52

Kashishipr

DECEMBER 8, 2021

Claiming Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) over a subject matter as debatable as life forms has created diverse opinions since the day such a claim application was first made. The third claim on the living bacterium itself was rejected on the rationale that it was a product of nature and not patentable under 35 USC 101.

Patent 105

Patent Intellectual Property Invention Ownership 105

IPilogue

JANUARY 10, 2022

Madelaine Lynch is a 3L JD Candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School, enrolled in Professor David Vaver’s 2021-2022 Intellectual Property Law & Technology Intensive Program. CII, such as algorithms, are frequently deemed an abstract idea, and thus not suitable for patent protection.

Invention 104

Invention Patent Intellectual Property IP 104

LexBlog IP

MAY 25, 2023

This strategic enhancement offers the much-needed insight into how the USPTO interprets the scope of patent eligible subject. As the landscape of patent law continues to evolve, it is crucial to stay updated on the latest developments, particularly in the area of subject matter eligibility.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Patent Intellectual Property Law Invention 52

LexBlog IP

DECEMBER 13, 2023

Key aspects of the STPP include: Expedited Examination : The program offers a faster review process for patent applications related to semiconductor manufacturing, thereby reducing the time it takes to obtain patent protection for new innovations. Intellectual property LAW GROUP Yuri L.

Technology 52

Technology Intellectual Property Law Patent Application Intellectual Property 52

LexBlog IP

APRIL 10, 2023

For most intellectual property questions, your attorney can be located anywhere in the United States. This is because most of the relevant intellectual property laws involving patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets are federal laws, which apply uniformly throughout the United States.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Law Registration Trademark 52

Canadian Intellectual Property Blog

SEPTEMBER 16, 2020

The aim of this series of short articles is to debunk these common myths around patent protection. Patent Myth #4: Even if I publicly disclose my invention, I can still get a patent application filed by the 12-month mark from the disclosure, without any repercussions.

Patent 52

Patent Invention Patent Application Intellectual Property 52

The IPKat

NOVEMBER 4, 2021

Burk, considers the patent context, titled AI Patents and the Self-Assembling Machine ; the second (chapter 8), titled Challenges of Artificial Intelligence to Patent Law and Copyright Law and Countermeasures , by Xiang Yu, Runzhe Zhang, Ben Zhang and Hua Wang, considers both patent and copyright.

Intellectual Property 141

Intellectual Property IP Ownership Law 141

The IPKat

JULY 16, 2024

This tome was first published in 1884 by Thomas Terrell, and in the 140 years since, has become a well-established authority for patent practitioners and judges, providing thorough commentary on both the substance and practice of UK patent law.

Law 64

Law Editing Patent Intellectual Property 64

Canadian Intellectual Property Blog

MAY 12, 2020

Determining inventorship, prior to patent issuance, can save an applicant the costly procedural and evidentiary burden required for correcting the named inventors post patent issuance. This article does not create a solicitor-client relationship between you and MBM Intellectual Property Law LLP.

Inventor 52

Inventor Patent Intellectual Property Invention 52

Kashishipr

OCTOBER 20, 2021

The main objective of Sections 26C and 27D was to prevent the patent holders from getting an extension on their patents by taking advantage of loopholes and undue benefits of the Justice system. India changed its Patents Laws in 2005 to comply with the TRIPS Agreement.

Patent 105

Patent Intellectual Property Inventor Government 105

Intepat

OCTOBER 6, 2024

MYTH 2: A GOOD IDEA ALONE IS ENOUGH FOR PATENT FILING Patent applications are detailed and require information about different aspects of the invention; therefore, mere outlining of the idea, no matter how good it is, cannot be patented without explaining the workings and the practical aspects of that idea.

Patent 52

Patent Invention Public Domain Intellectual Property 52

LexBlog IP

MARCH 13, 2024

The Report looked at: i) current and future applications of non-fungible tokens (“NFTs”); ii) how intellectual property laws apply to NFTs and assets associated with NFTs; iii) intellectual property-related challenges arising from the use of NFTs; and iv) potential ways to use NFTs to secure and manage intellectual property rights.

Reporting 52

Reporting Non-Fungible Tokens IP Intellectual Property 52

The IPKat

JANUARY 12, 2024

At the close of 2023, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom handed down its eagerly awaited and widely publicized judgment in Thaler v Comptroller-General confirming that a patent application may not name an AI machine as an inventor. So for those beloved folks, this article in Cycling Weekly will really hit the spot.

IP 69

IP Law Intellectual Property Law Invention 69

Patently-O

APRIL 17, 2024

Ana Santos Rutschman, From Myriad to Moderna: The Modern Pharmaceutical Company , Texas A&M University Journal of Property Law (2024) (forthcoming). Judges , American University Law Review (2025) (forthcoming). Christa Laser, Scientific Educations Among U.S. McCrudden, Drugs, Deception, and Disclosure , 38 BERKELEY TECH. .”

Journalism 40

Journalism Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Law Patent Prosecution 40

LexBlog IP

MARCH 5, 2023

In considering the first factor, the court recognized that state-law tort claims based on the communication of patent rights, such as HBL’s tortious-interference and defamation claims, “are preempted by federal patent laws, unless the claimant can show that the patent holder acted in bad faith.”

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Patent Intellectual Property Law Litigation 52

Patently-O

MAY 30, 2024

. § 154(b), and the judicially-created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting (ODP). Cellect is now seeking certiorari, and the New York Intellectual Property Law Association (NYIPLA) has stepped in with an amicus brief supporting the petition, arguing that the case presents “questions of exceptional importance.”

Patent 40

Patent Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property Law 40

LexBlog IP

APRIL 12, 2023

.” But our problem often is that the law, or lawyers, frequently use unfamiliar or exotic terms that others claim have no more understood meaning than a reference to a “ vermicious kind ,” and those or other lawyers may overuse a word that they do not seem to actually comprehend. Eset, LLC, a patent case.

Law 52

Law IP Intellectual Property Copyright 52

SpicyIP

JULY 22, 2023

On page 8, it mentions that India shall benefit from the AI innovation wave if it develops a robust intellectual property regime. It notes that despite the government initiatives to strengthen India’s IP regime, applying the ‘narrowly focused’ and ‘stringent’ patent laws toward AI applications remains challenging.

IP 98

IP Intellectual Property Reporting Government 98

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

JANUARY 16, 2024

This may include patent applications with patent offices or registering trademarks and copyrights with relevant authorities. Understanding patent laws or copyright regulations can be daunting for founders who may not have a legal background.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Cease and Desist Invention Branding 52

LexBlog IP

MARCH 27, 2023

ChatGPT responded with the following, which for the most part is accurate, but gets details such as the “founding date” wrong: Marshall Gerstein is a law firm based in Chicago, Illinois, that specializes in intellectual property law. No, according to various patent offices and patent laws around the world.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property IP Inventor Copyright 52

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

JANUARY 3, 2023

Sara’s IP litigation experience includes both patent litigation and trade secret misappropriation litigation, which often also include various associated breach of contract and business torts. from the University of Georgia School of Law and was the senior notes editor of the Journal of Intellectual Property Law.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Journalism Intellectual Property Law Litigation 52