The IPKat

OCTOBER 10, 2021

Copyright The Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice published an Author's Take piece considering what the way forward for the press publishers' right might be under EU copyright law. This Kat is having a haunted October This post promises to take readers around the IP blogs in eight posts.

Blogging 69

Blogging IP Intellectual Property Law Journalism 69

LexBlog IP

JULY 31, 2023

AI and IP Law: Podcast with Yuri Eliezer by Yuri L. Eliezer AI and Intellectual Property Law An Insightful Discussion with Yuri Eliezer The intersection of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Intellectual Property (IP) Law is becoming increasingly significant in the dynamic landscape of technology and innovation.

Law 52

Law IP Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Law 52

Kashishipr

MARCH 9, 2022

At present, the software, in many cases, is released under what’s widely known as an ‘Open-Source License,’ which corresponds to the idea that anyone can view and modify the source code of a particular piece of software. Open-source patents combine the concept of traditional patents and open-source licensing.

Patent 81

Patent Patent Troll Licensing Invention 81

The IPKat

FEBRUARY 20, 2024

The Guidance will assist examiners to determine whether a natural person’s contribution in AI-assisted inventions is significant enough to be considered an inventor. There are also interesting questions about whether the deeming of copyright as "moveable property" is constitutional at all.

Moral Rights 69

Moral Rights Intellectual Property Editing Inventor 69

Kluwer Copyright Blog

DECEMBER 1, 2021

Responses from the earlier call for views have raised the need to improve licensing mechanisms for TDM purposes. The law in the UK, as well as in many other major jurisdictions, requires that an inventor is named in the application and that the inventor must be a natural person. More from our authors: Law of Raw Data.

IP 75

IP Inventor Invention Intellectual Property 75

Kashishipr

FEBRUARY 2, 2022

Fringe patents are usually irrelevant to a company’s product line and could, therefore, be licensed, pruned, or abandoned. Furthermore, the coming of new entrants into the market adversely affects the market share of the already existing innovators and inventors.

Brands 98

Brands Branding Branding Business 98

Canadian Intellectual Property Blog

MARCH 2, 2021

For larger companies, budget is also a concern, but often it is also the time required of inventors to adequately document an invention disclosure and to work with a patent professional. Often, a patent inventor is also a company executive such as the CEO or CTO and their time is limited. So, what happens if you decide not to patent?

Invention 52

Invention Patent Inventor Intellectual Property 52

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 26, 2023

Bharathwaj is a student at the Rajiv Gandhi School of Intellectual Property Law, IIT Kharagpur and loves reading books and IP law. Image from here Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC V. Highlighting this contradiction within the judgement, we are pleased to bring to you this guest post by Bharathwaj Ramakrishnan.

Technology 59

Technology Licensing Design Designs 59

LexBlog IP

APRIL 10, 2023

For most intellectual property questions, your attorney can be located anywhere in the United States. This is because most of the relevant intellectual property laws involving patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets are federal laws, which apply uniformly throughout the United States.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Law Registration Trademark 52

IIPRD

APRIL 2, 2024

vi] This is where governments use ‘compulsory licensing’ to ensure access to affordable drugs in public health emergencies and foster innovation, where patents and monopolies gained through it has prevailed. Studies have established a correlation between TRIPS-plus provisions and increased drug prices in importing nations.

Intellectual Property 105

Intellectual Property Brands Branding Branding 105

LexBlog IP

APRIL 3, 2023

This is an important decision to review in understanding licensing and litigation of international SEP portfolios. This decision indicates that a FRAND commitment is not a one-way street, but imposes obligations on both the SEP owner and someone seeking to license the SEP. those who stall licensing negotiations).

Licensing 52

Licensing Technology Intellectual Property Patent 52

IIPRD

FEBRUARY 6, 2024

In this sector, intellectual property (IP) regulations are essential for defending the rights of inventors, artists, and producers. Copyright law protects you as a musician by preventing unauthorized use of your creative works. Patents also provide inventors with temporary exclusive rights to their discoveries.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Cease and Desist Copyright Law Music 52

IIPRD

OCTOBER 7, 2024

Copyright also protects the original work of the inventors, such as the software code, literary work, music, and artwork. Licensing of Intellectual Property Rights for Startups, Gerald B Halt, Intellectual Property and Financing Strategies for the Technology Startups. Copyright and Trademarks, Copyright, I.

Intellectual Property 98

Intellectual Property Government Invention Brands 98

Canadian Intellectual Property Blog

MAY 28, 2020

Often times, inventors may believe that an invention they have come up with isn’t really inventive. Maybe the inventors have made an improvement to an existing technology, or maybe the invention combines a few known aspects in a new way. However, neither option would be available to an inventor who did not obtain their patent rights.

Patent 40

Patent Invention Inventor Intellectual Property 40

Intepat

MAY 18, 2023

INTRODUCTION Oftentimes, it is observed how intellectual property laws, specifically; patent laws are contradictory to competition and antitrust laws. While one confers rights on inventors to encourage innovation, the other aims to eradicate monopolistic practices and encourages healthy competition in the market.

Patent 52

Patent Licensing Intellectual Property Technology 52

IP and Legal Filings

FEBRUARY 12, 2023

While the antitrust laws prescribe unreasonably restraints of competition, the IPR laws reward the inventor with a temporary monopoly that insulates him from competitive exploitation of his protected art ”. Waters, Interest between Intellectual Property Law and Competition Law. [vi] Liang and P.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property Law Marketing 52

The IPKat

JULY 30, 2021

But many still insisted that the GPA does not allow ad-hoc balancing and implements proportionality through specifically enumerated exceptions, such as the compulsory license provision [a view expressed e.g. by Judge Klaus Grabinski of the Federal Supreme Court at a 2019 conference, here ]. here ]… and much more.

Patent Law 95

Patent Law Law Patent Intellectual Property 95

Canadian Intellectual Property Blog

JULY 7, 2020

Celebrate inventors to encourage the generation of new ideas. Leverage your IP to form strategic partnerships and alliances to scale up your business or license out your IP for royalty revenue. This article does not create a solicitor-client relationship between you and MBM Intellectual Property Law LLP.

IP 52

IP Intellectual Property Social Media Design 52

IIPRD

SEPTEMBER 17, 2024

The Owner of any invention has its struggle behind its creation, whether or not it is related to individual interest or huge space explorations, the Intellectual Property should be protected no matter how big or small it is. The country can apply its intellectual property law and deal with the issue.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Inventor IP Invention 52

IP Intelligence

APRIL 27, 2022

Zambrano subsequently filed a third-party complaint against Linda Scott, the sole member of Linda’s Leather and identified as the sole inventor on the asserted patents. Each was dismissed.

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Inventor Patent Invention 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

DECEMBER 12, 2021

Nonetheless, before any policy and law-making endeavour can be undertaken, a fitness test of the existing IP framework is indispensable. Recent discussions have focused on AI-aided and AI-generated output, concentrating on whether an AI system can be a creator or an inventor (see, among others, here and here ). by Christopher Heath. €

Copyright 52

Copyright Public Domain Intellectual Property Database Right 52

LexBlog IP

MARCH 4, 2022

Intellectual property (IP) is a legal term that encompasses a wide range of creations of the mind. The purpose of intellectual property law is to provide a legal framework to protect these creations from being copied or stolen. This can include inventions, designs, artwork, and even brand names and slogans.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Due Diligence Invention Business 52

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

JANUARY 16, 2024

There are several types of IPRs that startups should be aware of: Patents: Patents protect new inventions and grant exclusive rights to the inventor for a limited period. Thirdly, intellectual property rights facilitate strategic partnerships by increasing the value of a startup’s assets.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Cease and Desist Invention Brands 52

Intepat

OCTOBER 6, 2024

Additionally, intellectual property, including patents, copyrights, and trademarks, is governed by territorial laws, and enforcement varies by jurisdiction. Navigating the complexities of intellectual property law requires a thorough understanding of the rights, processes, and limitations involved.

Patent 52

Patent Invention Public Domain Intellectual Property 52

LexBlog IP

MAY 12, 2023

Similarly, a startup that owns copyrights to its original creative works, such as software, music, or literature, can license or sell those works, generating additional revenue streams. Also check out the Patent Pro Bono Program for Independent Inventors and Small Businesses.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Due Diligence IP Brands 52

LexBlog IP

MARCH 27, 2023

ChatGPT responded with the following, which for the most part is accurate, but gets details such as the “founding date” wrong: Marshall Gerstein is a law firm based in Chicago, Illinois, that specializes in intellectual property law. Patent law requires at least one human inventor. See Thaler v.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property IP Inventor Copyright 52

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

JANUARY 3, 2023

from the University of Georgia School of Law and was the senior notes editor of the Journal of Intellectual Property Law. from The George Washington University Law School in 2015. in 2015 from the University of Houston Law Center, her Ph.D. Sara received her J.D. in English. Jared received his J.D.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Journalism Intellectual Property Law Litigation 52

Intepat

JUNE 6, 2024

The ongoing debate about inventorship and ownership is significant, as AI may follow the trend of computer-implemented inventions where the inventor is still human. Trade Secrets Under the trade secret framework, biometric data, which is frequently classified as intellectual property, could be modified.

IP 52

IP Intellectual Property Privacy Inventor 52

Intepat

FEBRUARY 12, 2025

Patents incentivize innovation by granting inventors exclusive rights to their creations. Trade Secrets: By this law, business owners can protect their confidential information. Without significant protection in intellectual property law, sports and esports would struggle to sustain growth and profitability.

IP 52

IP Cease and Desist Intellectual Property Confidentiality 52