This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The withdrawal was expected, with panelists at IPWatchdog’s Life Sciences Masters Program in October predicting based on USPTO Director Kathi Vidal’s comments at the American IntellectualPropertyLaw Association (AIPLA) Annual Meeting that the rule was unlikely to be finalized before her departure from the Office.
Groups that have weighed in so far include the American IntellectualPropertyLaw Association (AIPLA), the National Association of Patent Practitioners (NAPP), the Patent Center Listserv, Patent and Trademark Attorney, Agents and Applicants for Restoration and Maintenance of Integrity in Government (PTAAARMIGAN), and hundreds of individual patent professionals. (..)
According to condition (c), an application that is granted a special status for expedited processing, such as under Track One or PatentProsecution Highway (PPH), is ineligible to the DSMER Program. According to condition (d), the DSMER Program is only open to applications governed by the SME requirements (the requirements of 35 U.S.C.
This is one of my favorite events of the year because it mixes intellectualpropertylaw discussion with three days of skiing. As I prepare to teach patentprosecution in the spring, I’m looking forward to hearing prosecution hot topics from George Lewis (Merchant & Gould).
According to condition (c), an application that is granted a special status for expedited processing, such as under Track One or PatentProsecution Highway (PPH), is ineligible to the DSMER Program. According to condition (d), the DSMER Program is only open to applications governed by the SME requirements (the requirements of 35 U.S.C.
Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) recent Request for Comments (RFC) on the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) highlights a critical juncture in intellectualpropertylaw—evaluating the impact of generative AI (GenAI) on the non-obviousness standard.
Until now, accelerated examination could be requested by presenting results of a prior art search from a specialized institute designated by the Korean IntellectualProperty Office (KIPO). These specialized institutes are usually separate from the governmentpatent office.
Enable more underrepresented groups to practice design patentlaw. Assist more underrepresented inventors in acquiring patents. Empower individuals with valuable knowledge of design to aid design patentprosecution. At Founders Legal, we are passionate about helping our clients protect their intellectualproperty.
In this post, developed along the lines of a literature review cum blogpost, Yashna Walia has looked through the various government policy documents on AI to see what they have to say about IP! However, he also stated that the government was not considering bringing a law or regulating the growth of artificial intelligence in the country.
Ana Santos Rutschman, From Myriad to Moderna: The Modern Pharmaceutical Company , Texas A&M University Journal of PropertyLaw (2024) (forthcoming). Judges , American University Law Review (2025) (forthcoming). Christa Laser, Scientific Educations Among U.S. McCrudden, Drugs, Deception, and Disclosure , 38 BERKELEY TECH.
Delhi High Court Comes Down Heavily on the Patent Office for Delay in Passing the Order Image by Freepik DHC comes down on the Patent Office for a four-year delay in issuing an order. Read this post by SpicyIP intern Jyotpreet on what this means for the delays in patentprosecution timelines. 1 ayurvedic paste”.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content