This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
They have sued rival restaurant chain Daryaganj for falsely taking credit for the creation of butter chicken. As reported , Monish Gujral, the managing director at Moti Mahal says “ You cannot take away somebody’s legacy … The dish was invented when our grandfather was in Pakistan.” News reports (of which there are several!
18, 2021) Doe, a real a **e (“deeply unsympathetic,” to use the court’s terms), advertised “ASU Covid Parties” on a similarly-named Instagram account and spewed a lot of bile as well as, in its first post, using ASU’s colors. The Board sued Doe for trademark infringement and related claims; Doe defaulted.
5, 2023) Hicks alleged that defendant, a California agricultural corporation, misrepresented the environmental impact of its farming practices through its advertising and “Inaugural Report on Environmental, Social and Governance Actions.” The court found that the commercial speech exception applied to the ESG report.
Despite the hype, it is a niche market, and purchasers are just as often speculative investors as they are fans or collectors. Risk of not making return Recent data shows that sales and profits of NFTs are slowing … 8.
Portkey sued for unfair competition/reverse passing off, falseadvertising, and trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, as well as related state-law claims. Venkateswaran, 2024 WL 3487735, No. 23-CV-5074 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Maybe companies can resurrect noncompetes by prohibiting uses of their trademarks in former employees’ resumes!
30, 2022) Pegasystems alleged that defendants, which compete with it in the business process management (BPM) software field, engaged in falseadvertising and commercial disparagement in an online report that portrayed Pegasystems unfavorably. Defendant BPM.com reported on the BPM industry. Previous discussion.)
The parties had other disputes, including accusing each other of posting false reviews of the other. Lanham Act falseadvertising counterclaim: IDT argued that, at most, its “Made in USA” statements were ambiguous. There’s more, including public disputes on Craigslist. Thus, Creager failed to show falsity or misleadingness.
2, 2022) Before the jury verdict in favor of Monster’s falseadvertising claim was this opinion resolving evidentiary issues. However, they fail to show that Monster dirtied its hands to make the falseadvertising claims now alleged against Defendants.” Monster Energy Co. Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2022 WL 17218077, No.
Elysium argued that the website as a whole was a referral website for Tru Niagen, which advertised Tru Niagen at the top of every page. There’s a difference between a statement about product benefits made by Consumer Reports and the same statement by a person with an economic motive who also displayed a banner, “Buy This Product.”
I’m only going to discuss the falseadvertising aspects. Taken together, the complaint didn’t plausibly allege commercial advertising or promotion. First, the court wasn’t convinced that the socialmedia posts or other alleged statements were commercial speech.
Facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs: Each of the plaintiffs has a significant number of followers on various socialmedia platforms, ranging from greater than ten thousand to several million, and most are “considered socialmedia influencers.” And their expert report was not good. 3d 233 (2d Cir.
I’ll focus, as usual, on the falseadvertising bits and ignore the securities law parts. It is widely understood that Kardashian is paid for many of her socialmedia posts, and therefore, it should not come as a surprise to any reasonable consumer that she was paid for the June Post given it included the “#AD” disclaimer.
Monster alleged that VPX falselyadvertised Super Creatine as a source of creatine providing numerous physical and mental benefits, advertising that BANG can improve brain function, has anti-depressive effects, and helps build muscle. means, because none of the allegedly false statements actually said “source of creatine.”
Butler found that there was no statistically significant difference in cells’ self-reported likelihood of purchasing shoes on StockX, suggesting lack of materiality. First, Nike argued, materiality was irrelevant because literally false claims are conclusively presumed to be material.
From the 2009 rankings to the 2010 rankings, USC Rossier’s reported acceptance rate dropped 40 percentage points (from 50.7% For example, 2U engaged in online advertising to promote USC Rossier’s ranking; it spent more than half of its revenue on program sales and marketing. to 10.5%), and its ranking rose 16 places (from #38 to #22).
They alleged violation of California’s FAL and UCL, falseadvertising under the Lanham Act, trade libel, and negligence. Anyway, Mosafer pled that various news sources, including the New York Times and the Associated Press, reported about Broidy’s alleged unregistered foreign lobbying efforts in March and April 2018.
but also narrows the issues somewhat; the larger infringement, cybersquatting, and falseadvertising claims can’t be resolved on summary judgment. logos on their materials to identify their socialmedia accounts. When I see these claims I think about all the businesses using Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn etc.
The Center for Countering Digital Hate is a not for profit organization that publishes reports on among other things, hate speech and disinformation on socialmedia. For example, it alleges that 12 posters are responsible for two thirds of the anti-vax content on socialmedia. Are the reportsadvertisements?
The third category lists notable developments on the legislative and policy side and includes important amendments, proposals for amendments, release of policy notes and reports etc. So, if you have strong opinions on orders/judgements that you think should’ve been included in the top 10 lists, please do share them in the comments below!
Across-the-board socialmedia and influencer marketing integration are aspects of the present-day artificiality regarding persuasive brand dissemination in faces and identities. Trademarks Scars on SocialMedia It defies law in this modern digital age. It has also brought a lot of challenges.
On socialmedia: "Were U planning on telling UR customers" [to switch before they lose service]? Comment: This is an interesting question given that TM/advertising people tend to define goodwill differently than general business valuation people, especially in the TM/falseadvertising context. In re Alert Hldgs.,
For about a decade, courts had realized that IIC had gone way too far, and had expanded liability in ways that didn’t protect consumers and facilitated anticompetitive claims about falseadvertising.
Other materials, such as internal documents used to train sales representatives, were held not to violate falseadvertising laws at all as there was no evidence those materials were ever shown to any physician or consumer. California has also launched an online tool for consumers to efficiently report potential violations.
Malwarebytes, which allowed a falseadvertising claim to proceed based on one software provider’s use of the terms “malicious” and “threat” to describe its alleged competitor’s software, despite a dissent raising free speech arguments. NJ case a few years back allowed falseadvertising claims against the advertiser to proceed.
This is one of the many AG enforcement actions against socialmedia for [reasons]. In this particular claim, the Indiana AG alleges that TikTok coaxed users to install its app on false pretenses, including deceptive omissions about its ties to China. The lower court dismissed the case. The appeals court revives it. TikTok , Nos.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content