This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
WowWee’s Vice President of Brand Development & Creative Strategy, Sydney Wiseman, used her WowWee email address to create a Roblox user account and used her Roblox account to promote My Avastars dolls on socialmedia, including videos on her TikTok account. This was enough survive the motion to dismiss.
12, 2023) Following a large verdict for Monster on falseadvertising claims, this opinion discusses extensively the requirements for injunctive relief in falseadvertising cases. A lost customer may constitute the loss of a relationship with a customer as well as reference to other potential customers.”
30, 2024) (R&R) Recommendation: Dastar should block Qingdao’s Lanham Act falseadvertising counterclaims based on Lashify’s claim to be the originator of lash technology, but false patent marking counterclaims should survive. This isn’t a false statement of origin (but what about character or qualities?)
18, 2021) Doe, a real a **e (“deeply unsympathetic,” to use the court’s terms), advertised “ASU Covid Parties” on a similarly-named Instagram account and spewed a lot of bile as well as, in its first post, using ASU’s colors. The Board sued Doe for trademark infringement and related claims; Doe defaulted.
JC Penny, for example, has been hit with a class action lawsuit in the Southern District of California over its alleged advertising practice of using “falsereference pricing.” The products, Carranza claims , were never sold at the listed reference price as advertised. Do the claims have merit?
But even if the Court afforded the “thanks” portion of the caption no promotional value, the remainder clearly promotes the Defendants by referring to MedSpa as “the number one med spa” and associating it with a “#celeb” and “#vip.”. If the clinic is falsely claiming that he is, that’s falseadvertising and possibly defamation.
Portkey sued for unfair competition/reverse passing off, falseadvertising, and trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, as well as related state-law claims. In 2022, the relationship dissolved; Portkey objected to Venkateswaran’s alleged references to Portkey and its asserted trademarks since 2022.
The parties had other disputes, including accusing each other of posting false reviews of the other. Lanham Act falseadvertising counterclaim: IDT argued that, at most, its “Made in USA” statements were ambiguous. There’s more, including public disputes on Craigslist. Thus, Creager failed to show falsity or misleadingness.
Therefore, the right to publicity in the US aims to prevent the unfair appropriation of an individual’s celebrity for commercial gains, indicating a close association with falseadvertising law. References [link] [link] Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp The post Unreasoned Orders for Personality Rights first appeared on IPLF.
The term refers to the usage of aspects of environmental protection in their trademarks and logos, overstating their commitment towards the cause, as a means of deceiving people into purchasing their products and services. A class action could also be initiated by the consumers themselves as a whole, being victims of falseadvertising.
Elysium argued that Right of Assembly was “a marketing website for Tru Niagen for which ChromaDex pays commissions to Shelly Albaum for Tru Niagen customers referred through the website.” Thus, any falseadvertising claim would lie against Albaum, not [directly] against ChromaDex.
Monster alleged that VPX falselyadvertised Super Creatine as a source of creatine providing numerous physical and mental benefits, advertising that BANG can improve brain function, has anti-depressive effects, and helps build muscle. VPX also allegedly advertised Super Creatine as providing the health benefits of “creatine.”
Facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs: Each of the plaintiffs has a significant number of followers on various socialmedia platforms, ranging from greater than ten thousand to several million, and most are “considered socialmedia influencers.” The court was guided by Electra v. 59 Murray Enterprises, Inc.,
The court certified a question to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court: Under what circumstances, if any, is material publicly posted to socialmedia platforms inherently unknowable for purposes of applying the discovery rule in the context of defamation, right to publicity, right to privacy and related tort claims?
“The test group was presented five pages from StockX’s website featuring the Authenticity Statements, and the control group was presented with similar webpages that featured versions of those statements that omitted references to ‘authentication’ or substituted them with references to ‘inspection.’”
21, 2023) In two opinions on the same day, the court dealt with various IP/falseadvertising claims brought by one litter box seller against another. Its socialmedia posts featured photos of the Leo’s Loo products, but those posts were tagged, at least in part, with #litterrobot, #LitterRobot, and #litterrobot3.
Although expressing some skepticism, the court found that they stated a valid falseadvertising claim. Factors supporting a commercial speech characterization include “[l] the speech is an advertisement, [2] the speech refers to a particular product, and [3] the speaker has an economic motivation.” Tornillo, 418 U.S.
“the WooLash advertisement that appeared after the “boostlash” search is labeled as an advertisement, and features a product clearly labeled as WooLash, with no reference to plaintiff’s BoostLash product. A click fraud case against a competitor: Motogolf fails to state a falseadvertising claim under the Lanham Act.
Peacock identified, among other things, Pabst’s “It’s the Water” slogan and the depiction of the “unique waterfalls from the (now) closed brewery from the Olympia area” on the Olympia Beer packaging, on its website, and on socialmedia.
Also, “the entirety of the advertisement on each website page describes in objective terms how much total food customers would receive.” They had calorie information, and Wendy’s said theirs was made with a “quarter-pound*” of beef with the asterisk referring to “[a]pproximate weight before cooking.”
Painaway advertised its products as “Australia’s No. 1 Joint & Muscle Spray and Cream Topical Pain Relief Brand” on: (1) its Australian website; (2) socialmedia; and (3) Ultimate Fighting Championship (“UFC”) athletes’ clothing in matches televised in the United States. The court granted summary judgment to MaxRelief.
Ariix sued NutriSearch and MacWilliam with similar claims to those raised here about Nutrisearch’s alleged lack of independence from and bias towards Usana, resulting in falseadvertising. Sales representatives are told to purchase the guide, “learn it, refer to it in making sales, and. pitch the guide to end consumers.”
Walkowicz allegedly received multiple emails and social-media messages commenting on the similarities between Walkowicz and Luciana and inquiries about whether they had endorsed the doll. I will note here, as I often do, that in a falseadvertising case these allegations would likely be treated as conclusory at best.
Viacom also engaged a market research company to learn more about “southern beach culture,” which suggested that the term Flora-bama was “either unknown or though [sic] to refer strictly to the bar.” An online article used photos of the Lounge in its coverage of the series, and MGFB also submitted socialmedia posts.
Since early 2020, Defendant Nepute and Quickwork have used several platforms, including socialmedia, emails, and radio, to tout the purported benefits of Vitamin D and zinc and to promote Wellness Warrior supplements. ” The evidence didn’t support the claim that the websites were used as educational references.
So too w/falseadvertising. Assumptions skipped over in TM/falseadvertising analysis.] Relevant consumer: perceptions can determine commercial strength but the inputs are often the same as for conceptual strength—dictionaries w/lower-case references. Keep up with the culture by considering socialmedia.
The Division Bench judgement was passed on October 13, in response to the reference made by a Single Judge Bench where the Court disagreed with the finding of the coordinate bench in Boehringer Ingelheim v. The judgement was passed by a Single Judge Bench of Justice Manish Pitale. Indian Performing Right Society Ltd.
but also narrows the issues somewhat; the larger infringement, cybersquatting, and falseadvertising claims can’t be resolved on summary judgment. LHB currently owns 64 domain names containing references to Taser or Axon Taser models. “ logos on their materials to identify their socialmedia accounts.
The Center for Countering Digital Hate is a not for profit organization that publishes reports on among other things, hate speech and disinformation on socialmedia. For example, it alleges that 12 posters are responsible for two thirds of the anti-vax content on socialmedia.
Alex Roberts, Multi-Level Lies: Distinctive feature is that laypeople are making advertising claims to friends, socialmedia followers, acquaintances, etc. Exploitative: 99% make no profit/lose money; stuck w/unwanted inventory; exploitative based on false promises of wealth and miracle products—the seller gets free advertising.
Across-the-board socialmedia and influencer marketing integration are aspects of the present-day artificiality regarding persuasive brand dissemination in faces and identities. Trademarks Scars on SocialMedia It defies law in this modern digital age. It has also brought a lot of challenges.
On socialmedia: "Were U planning on telling UR customers" [to switch before they lose service]? Comment: This is an interesting question given that TM/advertising people tend to define goodwill differently than general business valuation people, especially in the TM/falseadvertising context. In re Alert Hldgs.,
It was carefully crafted to deal only with control by a foreign adversary, and it was part of a broader effort to counter a well-substantiated national security threat posed by the PRC On the other hand… 1) influence operations don’t depend solely on ownership of socialmedia. See NetChoice, 144 S.
Malwarebytes, which allowed a falseadvertising claim to proceed based on one software provider’s use of the terms “malicious” and “threat” to describe its alleged competitor’s software, despite a dissent raising free speech arguments. Then I’ll talk about the 9 th Circuit case Enigma Software v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content