This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
12, 2023) Following a large verdict for Monster on falseadvertising claims, this opinion discusses extensively the requirements for injunctive relief in falseadvertising cases. Are lost prospective customers and market share purely economic harms? So too with lost market share. and] expects to complete.
14, 2022) Once in a blue moon, a falseadvertising-based antitrust claim survives a motion to dismiss in a circuit that imposes a list of excessive requirements on such claims. Consumers and advertisers adequately alleged that Facebook has monopoly power in social network/socialmedia (consumers) and socialadvertisingmarkets.
‘Influencer marketing,’ albeit a new word, has emerged as one of the most effective strategies to create money across all industries. A SocialMedia Influencer is someone who creates unique material that keeps people interested on multiple socialmedia platforms, causing them to return for more high-quality information.
It Works Marketing, Inc. The claims are mostly the kind of trade secret/tortious interference claims you’d expect from this setup, and I won’t say much about them, but there is also a falseadvertising claim about alleged misrepresentations of distributors’ income with Melaleuca. Melaleuca, Inc., 2021 WL 1650266, No.
30, 2024) (R&R) Recommendation: Dastar should block Qingdao’s Lanham Act falseadvertising counterclaims based on Lashify’s claim to be the originator of lash technology, but false patent marking counterclaims should survive. 1, 2017 to Apr. 11, 2023 (claiming that various products were “patented”).
18, 2021) Doe, a real a **e (“deeply unsympathetic,” to use the court’s terms), advertised “ASU Covid Parties” on a similarly-named Instagram account and spewed a lot of bile as well as, in its first post, using ASU’s colors. The Board sued Doe for trademark infringement and related claims; Doe defaulted.
Vogue’s publishers have sued rappers Drake and 21 Savage for unauthorized use of Vogue’s trademarks and false representations in marketing their newest album, “Her Loss”. This follows Vogue’s controversial lawsuit asking a small English pub called “The Star Inn at Vogue” to change its name.
If the clinic is falsely claiming that he is, that’s falseadvertising and possibly defamation. Potential irony alert: 50 Cent has taunted Diddy for getting botox … When, if ever, can a company share a photo of a customer/friend on socialmedia without consent? Case Citation : Jackson v. The complaint.
WowWee’s Vice President of Brand Development & Creative Strategy, Sydney Wiseman, used her WowWee email address to create a Roblox user account and used her Roblox account to promote My Avastars dolls on socialmedia, including videos on her TikTok account. This was enough survive the motion to dismiss.
A couple of specifics: The falseadvertising claims don’t escape 230: “Had those third-party users refrained from posting harmful content, Plaintiffs’ claims that Defendants falselyadvertised and misrepresented their applications’ safety would not be cognizable.” Despite Doe v. Case citation : Bride v.
17, 2023) Super-interesting holding that, while there’s no patent field preemption against bringing false patent marking claims under the Lanham Act, Dastar (as expansively interpreted to cover falseadvertising claims) does preclude such claims, possibly only because of party argument. Dismissed with leave to amend.
A screenshot from the (now deleted) socialmedia video at the center of the controversy. As for the business disparagement claim, State Farm argued that there was no malicious intent or false statement about Atari, and that the lighthearted tone of the ad didn’t suggest any serious defects in the company’s products.
Bluegreen sued a lot of entities, but only the marketing defendants remained in the case: their role was “to advertise timeshare exit services by promoting a legitimate process to exit timeshare contracts while protecting the customers’ credit.” In a particularly “yikes” bit, one marketing defendant 1990.
30, 2022) Pegasystems alleged that defendants, which compete with it in the business process management (BPM) software field, engaged in falseadvertising and commercial disparagement in an online report that portrayed Pegasystems unfavorably. Appian disseminated the report through its sales team, socialmedia, and other marketing.
The non-fungible part means that it is something that has unique value based on the buyer’s sentiment and/or market dynamics. In practice, what this means is that a whole new market has been opened-up as NFTs have provided a system that has enabled the sale of digital items by transforming them into collectables, such as a tweet.
3, 2021) The parties compete in the market for custom landscape design services. “[I]n Natorp’s removed all of his photos from its website shortly after he complained, but the photos allegedly remained “online at various socialmedia outlets including Natorp’s private website, Facebook, and Pinterest.” McCleese v. Natorp’s, Inc.,
It submitted 14 socialmedia posts “which it contends shows consumers and retailers attributed a particular source to Defendants’ liquor and Plaintiff’s television show.” Falseadvertising/passing off: Same basic problems. And Mandabach failed to show actual association of the TV show with a particular source.
28, 2022) Chanel sued What Goes Around Comes Around (WGACA), alleging trademark infringement, falseadvertising, false association/endorsement, and related NY GBL claims for deceptive/unfair trade practices and falseadvertising. Until 2017, it also used the hashtag #WGACACHANEL in its socialmedia posts.
To make matters worse, State Farm’s resident do-gooder “Jake” lands a Fonzie-style smack on the Crystal Castles machine to get it working—”suggesting falsely and disparagingly to consumers that Atari’s cabinets are low-quality, faulty, and/or unreliable.”
2, 2022) Before the jury verdict in favor of Monster’s falseadvertising claim was this opinion resolving evidentiary issues. They weren’t directly asked about the phrase “Super Creatine,” whether participants had prior experiences with or opinions of Bang, or whether they had seen Vital’s advertising in the market.
The parties compete in the market for skid steer attachments and other products. Creager sells Montana post drivers (made in China) that compete with the Texas post drivers sold by IDT (advertised as made in the USA). The parties had other disputes, including accusing each other of posting false reviews of the other.
The underlying legal principles are not complicated: content rules in TOSes are negative behavioral restrictions on authors’ conduct, not marketing or contractual promises to readers that such content will never appear on the site. YouTube appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Google LLC , 2024 WL 2809371 (Cal.
For example, socialmedia has been widely discussing the impact of micro-plastics on the environment and contemplating methods to reduce its release. The objective is to mislead the consumers knowing well the marketability of this concept. Another pertinent aspect is the effect of its disposal to the environment.
Portkey sued for unfair competition/reverse passing off, falseadvertising, and trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, as well as related state-law claims. Venkateswaran, 2024 WL 3487735, No. 23-CV-5074 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Maybe companies can resurrect noncompetes by prohibiting uses of their trademarks in former employees’ resumes!
Advertising can take many forms, including statements about a company’s products on websites and socialmedia platforms. In this 60-minute webinar, designed exclusively for in-house counsel, you will learn how you can protect your company against legal challenges based on its advertising practices.
Plaintiff WATL is allegedly the preeminent governing body and league for the sport of axe throwing and uses the trademark “WATL” to market and publicize the axe throwing league. 14, 2023) Plaintiffs sued defendants for state and federal trademark infringement and related claims. Toyota, 610 F.3d 3d at 1177.
Was this commercial advertising or promotion? Elysium argued that Right of Assembly was “a marketing website for Tru Niagen for which ChromaDex pays commissions to Shelly Albaum for Tru Niagen customers referred through the website.” Thus, any falseadvertising claim would lie against Albaum, not [directly] against ChromaDex.
19, 2022) The parties compete in the market for energy drinks. VPX (Vital) makes BANG, which now contains creatyl-l-leucine (CLL), “a novel ingredient marketed under the trademark ‘Super Creatine.’ … Defendants claim that CLL is more stable and more bioavailable than other forms of creatine.” VPX definitely didn’t prove truth.
Princeton insured Wonderland from 2016-2018 (with a broad exclusion for defamation, invasion of privacy, and various forms of advertising injury in the second year called the Exhibitions and Related Marketing Exclusion), and agreed to defend the club but reserved the right to deny insurance coverage.
I’ll focus, as usual, on the falseadvertising bits and ignore the securities law parts. Another theory of harm came from allegations that the executive defendants and some of the promoter/influencer defendants were selling off their tokens as they promoted them, engaging in market manipulation.
21, 2023) In two opinions on the same day, the court dealt with various IP/falseadvertising claims brought by one litter box seller against another. Plaintiff (dba Whisker) sued defendant (dba Smarty Pear), its competitor in the market for automated, self-cleaning litter boxes. Purlife Brands, Inc., 2023 WL 3046592, No.
They alleged that defendants copied the program and infringed the patent, as well as engaged in a smear campaign against plaintiffs in an effort to steal market share in the pediatric orthopedic industry. I’m only going to discuss the falseadvertising aspects. They didn’t advertise any alternative or promote a specific product.
Facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs: Each of the plaintiffs has a significant number of followers on various socialmedia platforms, ranging from greater than ten thousand to several million, and most are “considered socialmedia influencers.” The court was guided by Electra v. 59 Murray Enterprises, Inc.,
As for the positivity of the ads, “consumer surveys in falseadvertising cases commonly display the challenged advertisement.” Nike’s complaints about the stimuli were also nitpicking; stimuli must merely roughly simulate market conditions. Cross-examination could address any deviation from market conditions.
A click fraud case against a competitor: Motogolf fails to state a falseadvertising claim under the Lanham Act. First, Motogolf does not plausibly allege that the defendants’ clicking activity constitutes commercial advertising. ” Arizona Board of Regents v. 21-16525 (9th Cir. May 13, 2022). Motogolf.com, LLC v.
23, 2024) Plaintiffs alleged that defendants conspired to inflate the US News ranking of USC Rossier School of Education by submitting inaccurate or incomplete data to US News and market the resulting ranking to the public. As Plaintiffs note, if the law were otherwise, “any business that submits false information to get a certification.
Peacock alleged that Pabst violated consumer protection law by marketing “The Original Olympia Beer” as using naturally filtered, artisan water from Tumwater, Washington (a suburb of Olympia, Washington) “despite the product being brewed elsewhere in the country using lower quality water and brewing methods.” Pabst Brewing Co.,
Marketing Sales Practices & Prods. Plaintiffs moved to certify four classes of purchasers of JUUL products on “theories that defendants’ marketing of JUUL was unlawfully deceptive, JUUL was unlawfully marketed to youth, and JUUL products are not fit for ordinary use.” In Re Juul Labs, Inc., I don't even have a RICO tag!
20, 2023) The parties compete in the supplement market using direct marketing, so compete in both consumer supplement sales and in sales representative recruitment. Usana incorporates the Guide into its marketing training. Usana characterizes payments to NutriSearch and MacWilliam as marketing expenses. Ariix LLC v.
Painaway advertised its products as “Australia’s No. 1 Joint & Muscle Spray and Cream Topical Pain Relief Brand” on: (1) its Australian website; (2) socialmedia; and (3) Ultimate Fighting Championship (“UFC”) athletes’ clothing in matches televised in the United States.
American Girl applied for trademarks on a space-themed doll named Luciana Vega, which it began marketing in 2018 as its “Girl of the Year” doll. Walkowicz allegedly received multiple emails and social-media messages commenting on the similarities between Walkowicz and Luciana and inquiries about whether they had endorsed the doll.
Kaira District Co-Operative Milk Producers’ Union Limited and Gujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd. The Defendants were advertising, marketing and selling milk products in Canada through LinkedIn in association with the trademark AMUL and claiming to be Kaira. Kaira also established trademark infringement.
Florida’s safe harbor didn’t apply because, although the TTB approved the Blue Ice label, the alleged misrepresentations appeared only on the secondary label and bottle collar, as well as the website/socialmedia, none of which were approved by the TTB.
So too w/falseadvertising. Assumptions skipped over in TM/falseadvertising analysis.] Keep up with the culture by considering socialmedia. It’s market definition. Death closes things off. Makes sense b/c consumer protection law’s goal is information safety and not vindicating rights of decedent.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content