This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
12, 2023) Following a large verdict for Monster on falseadvertising claims, this opinion discusses extensively the requirements for injunctive relief in falseadvertising cases. Plus, they hadn’t removed existing falseadvertising from their socialmedia accounts. and] expects to complete.
30, 2024) (R&R) Recommendation: Dastar should block Qingdao’s Lanham Act falseadvertising counterclaims based on Lashify’s claim to be the originator of lash technology, but false patent marking counterclaims should survive. However, the Noerr-Pennington doctrine didn’t apply to this case at this stage of the litigation.
A couple of specifics: The falseadvertising claims don’t escape 230: “Had those third-party users refrained from posting harmful content, Plaintiffs’ claims that Defendants falselyadvertised and misrepresented their applications’ safety would not be cognizable.” I share the heartbreak. 2023 U.S.
A screenshot from the (now deleted) socialmedia video at the center of the controversy. The judge dismissed the business disparagement, falseadvertising, unfair competition, and unjust enrichment claims. Socialmedia doing what it does best. In the meantime, a copy of the court’s opinion is below.
Advertising can take many forms, including statements about a company’s products on websites and socialmedia platforms. In this 60-minute webinar, designed exclusively for in-house counsel, you will learn how you can protect your company against legal challenges based on its advertising practices.
The parties had other disputes, including accusing each other of posting false reviews of the other. LJD therefore reduced the amount of business it conducted with Creager until it could determine how the litigation between Creager and IDT was resolved. There’s more, including public disputes on Craigslist.
I’m only going to discuss the falseadvertising aspects. There is an ongoing, separate litigation about ownership of the relevant patent; plaintiffs alleged that the two inventors assigned the patent to plaintiff Orthex.
In Re Ethereummax Investor Litig., I’ll focus, as usual, on the falseadvertising bits and ignore the securities law parts. Given the issue of whether the Tokens are a “security” is a genuinely unanswered legal question, it would be unfair (and contrary to Rule 8) to prohibit alternative pleading at this stage of the litigation.”
Facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs: Each of the plaintiffs has a significant number of followers on various socialmedia platforms, ranging from greater than ten thousand to several million, and most are “considered socialmedia influencers.” The court was guided by Electra v. 59 Murray Enterprises, Inc.,
Bluegreen sued a lot of entities, but only the marketing defendants remained in the case: their role was “to advertise timeshare exit services by promoting a legitimate process to exit timeshare contracts while protecting the customers’ credit.” Any “exit” came from default.
In re: Elysium Health-ChromaDex Litigation, No. A whole industry exists of socialmedia influencers, who create their own content touting products and receive commission on sales of those products that stem from their advertising. 17-cv-7394 (LJL) (S.D.N.Y. 11, 2022) This is the main liability opinion.
3, 2022) Plaintiffs alleged that they employed the individual defendants in part to manage socialmediaadvertising and promotion for plaintiffs’ baking businesses, aka La Baguette. The law on the ownership of a socialmedia pages created by employees for employers is evolving rapidly and varies between jurisdictions.
30, 2022) Pegasystems alleged that defendants, which compete with it in the business process management (BPM) software field, engaged in falseadvertising and commercial disparagement in an online report that portrayed Pegasystems unfavorably. Appian disseminated the report through its sales team, socialmedia, and other marketing.
Mary Katherine Amerine, Reasonably Careless Consumers in TM & FalseAdvertising How do courts treat consumers in TM and falseadvertising cases? Falseadvertising uses v different framework: consider the challenged ad as a whole, including disclaimers and qualifying language. Beer Nuts, Bulls’ Eye v.
They alleged violation of California’s FAL and UCL, falseadvertising under the Lanham Act, trade libel, and negligence. The counterclaims lacked merit, given the litigation privilege, and the court would reach the same result under FRCP 12(b)(6) if the anti-SLAPP statute didn’t extend to foreign defendants.
In re: Elysium Health-ChromaDex Litigation, No. Damages experts: The court began with a statement that a Lanham Act [falseadvertising] plaintiff must prove causation to get damages. 17-cv-7394 (LJL), 2022 WL 421135 (S.D.N.Y. test/control stimuli His survey population differed somewhat as did the control group/questions.
Ariix sued NutriSearch and MacWilliam with similar claims to those raised here about Nutrisearch’s alleged lack of independence from and bias towards Usana, resulting in falseadvertising. Under these theories, Usana would have been aware of the ongoing litigation between MacWilliam, NutriSearch, and Ariix.”
All were limited to individuals who purchased JUUL products from brick and mortar or online retailers (with the usual exclusions for those involved in the litigation). Variations in different marketing campaigns and channels (socialmedia versus traditional media) did not defeat predominance. In Re Juul Labs, Inc.,
State bars don’t have standing requirements and you don’t have to litigate in the case itself. I also don’t think used, grey market, expired/near expired, repackaged goods, mishandled goods are infringing or counterfeit; the problem if any is that they’re falselyadvertised. NYU Press, 2016).
14, 2022) Once in a blue moon, a falseadvertising-based antitrust claim survives a motion to dismiss in a circuit that imposes a list of excessive requirements on such claims. Consumers and advertisers adequately alleged that Facebook has monopoly power in social network/socialmedia (consumers) and socialadvertising markets.
An online article used photos of the Lounge in its coverage of the series, and MGFB also submitted socialmedia posts. Plaintiffs’ socialmedia expert opined that the show meant that Internet searches for “Florabama” or “Flora-Bama” led to “blurred” results filled with MTV Floribama Shore content. [My
The decisions in the first category, i.e., Top 10 IP Cases/Judgements (Topicality/Impact) reflect those that we thought were important from a topical point of view and were covered by the media in some way owing to the importance of parties litigating or the issue being considered or for impact on industry and innovation/creativity ecosystem etc.
Socialmedia influencers seem reasonably held liable, but what about when the seller is texting friends. Lemley: is/should there be contributory falseadvertising liability? We don’t need to reform advertising law; we need to reform agency law. How do they make that happen? Gender and class?
On socialmedia: "Were U planning on telling UR customers" [to switch before they lose service]? Comment: This is an interesting question given that TM/advertising people tend to define goodwill differently than general business valuation people, especially in the TM/falseadvertising context. In re Alert Hldgs.,
Some of them described themselves and why they read the blog: “A senior director on our legal team forwarded one of your blog posts to a few of us on the litigation team a few days into me starting in-house. ” “Im a litigator often specializing in internet law related issues, particularly under Section 230.
For instance, during the Trump presidency, then-California Attorney General Xavier Becerra sued the federal government more than 110 times, spending tens of millions of dollars on litigation on a wide variety of issues spanning immigration, voting rights and climate change, among others. Mexico border. Takeaway No. Takeaway No.
Malwarebytes, which allowed a falseadvertising claim to proceed based on one software provider’s use of the terms “malicious” and “threat” to describe its alleged competitor’s software, despite a dissent raising free speech arguments. Then I’ll talk about the 9 th Circuit case Enigma Software v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content