This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Defendants allegedly copied key components of Trackman’s copyrighted software and falsely suggested, in promotions and advertisements, that defendants were authorized to use the well-known courses in their game. Although the court dismissed a contract claim, copyright and falseadvertising claims survived.
A SocialMedia Influencer is someone who creates unique material that keeps people interested on multiple socialmedia platforms, causing them to return for more high-quality information. One of the most significant methods to safeguard material on socialmedia is through copyright. Make intangible assets.
A screenshot from the (now deleted) socialmedia video at the center of the controversy. Effect on the market : Atari alleged that it has an active licensing business extending its brand into advertising, merchandising, and other areas. Socialmedia doing what it does best.
17, 2023) Super-interesting holding that, while there’s no patent field preemption against bringing false patent marking claims under the Lanham Act, Dastar (as expansively interpreted to cover falseadvertising claims) does preclude such claims, possibly only because of party argument. 3d 1137 (9th Cir. Baden Sports, Inc.
It submitted 14 socialmedia posts “which it contends shows consumers and retailers attributed a particular source to Defendants’ liquor and Plaintiff’s television show.” Falseadvertising/passing off: Same basic problems. And Mandabach failed to show actual association of the TV show with a particular source.
Natorp’s removed all of his photos from its website shortly after he complained, but the photos allegedly remained “online at various socialmedia outlets including Natorp’s private website, Facebook, and Pinterest.” Along with copyright claims, McCleese asserted Lanham Act falseadvertising claims.
Digital assets can be protected by IP and have always been capable of being licensed or assigned via a contract, or protected as a trade mark. For example, the owners of the famous “ Grumpy Cat ” meme licensed the use of the name, image and likeness of the cat – and successfully enforced these rights.
The parties had other disputes, including accusing each other of posting false reviews of the other. Creager never attempted to license the images or otherwise value them, other than to testify that no amount of money would justify licensing to a competitor for this type of ad.
Facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs: Each of the plaintiffs has a significant number of followers on various socialmedia platforms, ranging from greater than ten thousand to several million, and most are “considered socialmedia influencers.” The court was guided by Electra v. 59 Murray Enterprises, Inc.,
Although expressing some skepticism, the court found that they stated a valid falseadvertising claim. But buying a limited-time license to stream a digital copy of Yesterday was neither a tangible good nor a service under the CLRA. They allegedly watched the movie because they wanted to see De Armas and the scene in the movie.
A whole industry exists of socialmedia influencers, who create their own content touting products and receive commission on sales of those products that stem from their advertising. Thus, any falseadvertising claim would lie against Albaum, not [directly] against ChromaDex. for the control.”
May 19, 2023) Whereas the timeshare falseadvertising cases might be making law largely applicable to other timeshare cases, what’s going on in the strip club advertising cases might have somewhat broader implications. The district court concluded that plaintiffs’ false endorsement claims were foreclosed by Electra v.
We know that automated systems designed to flag infringements get lots of false positives b/c they can’t recognize fair use; may also be false negatives, though that’s not the focus. No, for so many reasons, including that the alternative to fair use is licensing.] Some sort of naked licensing/transfer in gross?
The court certified a question to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court: Under what circumstances, if any, is material publicly posted to socialmedia platforms inherently unknowable for purposes of applying the discovery rule in the context of defamation, right to publicity, right to privacy and related tort claims?
I’m ignoring the complicating effects of various socialmedia censorship laws that may require Internet services to enforce their TOSes as written, a requirement I think is unconstitutional). It was an easy dismissal in Noah, and it remains an easy dismissal now. (I’m
The agreement granting CMT a license to broadcast that program does not mention Plaintiffs. But Plaintiffs contend they ‘verbally’ licensed their trademark to Kenny Chesney and the company that represents him, Blue Chair Bay Records, and then Blue Chair Bay Records sublicensed the rights to Viacom for the broadcast on CMT.”
Also identity concealment—Worldcom to MCI; organizational misdescription—renaming, reorganization, shell companies; source obfuscation, where FB rebrands to Meta as distraction; affiliative disinformation—broader rebranding associated w social movements. Sheff: What about licensing/merchandising in this system? Fresh start.
This will potentially impact the copyright licensing landscape insofar as filmmakers will have to enter into dedicated agreements to claim protection for works not listed within the scope of Section 17. Microsoft Technology Licensing v. the licensee. The judgement was authored by Justice C. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (PUBL) v.
For about a decade, courts had realized that IIC had gone way too far, and had expanded liability in ways that didn’t protect consumers and facilitated anticompetitive claims about falseadvertising. May 20, 2021) (R&R) renting existing equipment; Pine was formerly one of Proactive’s licensed distributors for the pumps.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content