This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Dawgs’ (“Dawgs”) counterclaim for falseadvertising under the Lanham Act. In 2016, Dawgs added new asserted counterclaims against Crocs, including a claim for falseadvertising under the Lanham Act. The briefs also discuss, to a limited extend, patent law’s false marking statute, 35 U.S.C. §
Brough Brothers alleged that Fresh Bourbon falselyadvertised that Fresh Bourbon is the first black-owned bourbon distillery in Kentucky, and made other related claims. Thus, the actual statement wasnt literally false, given the Senate resolution, even if the resolution was drafted by Fresh Bourbons representatives.
Skillz sued its competitor Papaya, alleging falseadvertising under federal and state law. Skillz allegedly markets its games as being uniquely fair and trustworthy with a badge indicating it is Committed to Fair Play and a claim that it will [m]atch [users] with real players of equal skill in its games.
Rebecca Tushnet and I are pleased to announce the sixth edition of our casebook, Advertising & MarketingLaw: Cases & Materials. Chapter 2: What is an Advertisement? Chapter 3: FalseAdvertising Overview. Chapter 9: FalseAdvertising Practice and Remedies. Price: $12.
The court cites a mix of competitor lawsuits (which this is clearly not) and some antiquated 20+ year old griper precedent that are no longer credible law since the more modern approaches to gripers. How can Troia vie for a “market” when the court already said he “is not offering a good or service”???
Also, in “other cases, the threat of future harm may be the consumer’s plausible allegations that she might purchase the product in the future, despite the fact it was once marred by falseadvertising or labeling, as she may reasonably, but incorrectly, assume the product was improved.”
In summer 2020, AHBP began negotiating with the Lynd defendants for the exclusive license to market and sell a surface disinfectant/cleaner known as “Bioprotect 500” in Argentina. Lynd advertised the Product as effective against the coronavirus. the Lanham Act falseadvertising claim survived.
Rebecca Tushnet and I are pleased to announce the seventh edition of our casebook, Advertising & MarketingLaw: Cases & Materials. Preface Chapter 1: Overview Chapter 2: What is an Advertisement? Chapter 3: FalseAdvertising Overview Chapter 4: Deception Chapter 5: Which Facts Matter?
Vitamins Online sued Heartwise under the Lanham Act and Utah’s Unfair Competition Law for falseadvertising about the ingredients of its competitive nutritional supplements and manipulating those products’ Amazon reviews. A presumption of injury began in the Second Circuit for comparative advertising. Heartwise, Inc.,
17, 2023) Another entry in the “courts treat Lanham Act falseadvertising very differently than Lanham Act trademark infringement, despite identical damages provisions” line. CareDx sued Natera for falseadvertising. Nor did significant sales growth linked to the marketing campaign at issue. Natera, Inc.,
14, 2021) Dawgs alleged that Crocs falselymarketed its shoes in violation of the Lanham Act by advertising Croslite, the foam material that Crocs shoes are made from, as “patented,” “proprietary,” and “exclusive.” Crocs, Inc. Effervescent, Inc., 2021 WL 4170997, No. 06-cv-00605-PAB-KMT, No. 16-cv-02004-PAB-KMT (D.
Amazon is an ICS provider: Plaintiff alleges that Defendants “market” and “sell” products to retail consumers “through internet websites.” “Plaintiff does not allege that any of the products that purportedly contain falseadvertising use its marks “Planet Green” or “Doorstepink.”
But when advertising or marketing materials overstate the scope of patent or other IP rights, they may create the risk of a falseadvertising claim. Patented technologies or features can be valuable selling points, setting your products apart from the competition. By: Fenwick & West LLP
Carrier & Rebecca Tushnet, An Antitrust Framework for FalseAdvertising , 106 Iowa L. 1841 (2021) From the introduction: Federal law presumes that falseadvertising harms competition. Federal law also presumes that falseadvertising is harmless or even helpful to competition.
January 5, 2022), the Court granted Defendant Next Caller’s post-trial renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law of no falseadvertising under the Lanham Act and to take away the jury’s award of punitive damages. The Court granted Defendant’s motion for two reasons. A copy of the Memorandum Opinion is attached.
Republic alleged that HBI, its competitor in the tobacco rolling paper industry, engaged in falseadvertising under the Lanham Act, unfair competition, and violations of the IUDTPA. But IUDTPA remedies are additional to any other remedies available against the same conduct under the common law. There was no special verdict form.
TFL’s website allegedly provides a variety “Affiliate Marketing Resources,” and its marketing director’s LinkedIn profile states that his duties include “Run[ning] and monitor[ing] marketing campaigns.” Defendants argued that they merely licensed legitimate, commercial software for lawful use only.
This is another lawsuit between personal injury law firms over competitive keyword ads. The plaintiff is Nicolet Law, based in Hudson, Wisconsin with 14 offices in Wisconsin and Minnesota. However, note that Nicolet Law, a surname, isn’t registered with the USPTO and there may be questions about its secondary meaning.
22, 2022) The court here allows an antitrust claim to proceed based in part on allegedly false/misleading statements because they form part of the alleged anticompetitive product-hopping scheme and because the unique characteristics of the drug market make market-based responses to falseadvertising difficult.
Here, the court granted leave to amend to add a falseadvertising claim. One of its most popular products is a line of copper-infused compression clothing, marketed under the trademark “Copper Fit,” allegedly designed to alleviate muscle and joint soreness and pain. Nor would amendment be futile.
Boston Carriage’s principals voluntarily shared their business knowledge with Boston Suburban, including Boston Carriage’s business and marketing strategies and its online presence.” This included a state-law dilution claim, since state law required only distinctiveness.
2, 2021) Rex sued Zillow and the National Association of Realtors for antitrust and falseadvertising violations. Surprisingly, the antitrust claims survive, as do falseadvertising claims agains Zillow. C21-312 TSZ, 2021 WL 3930694 (W.D. NAR “is the nation’s largest trade association for real estate professionals.”
The statements were “commercial advertising meant to sell a product, and generally there ‘can be no constitutional objection to the suppression of commercial messages that do not accurately inform the public.’” Not all marketing of artistic works is noncommercial speech. There was also no copyright preemption. citing Rezec v.
First, the court found that the state consumer protection law claims couldn’t cover the US because it wasn’t enough to allege that “substantially similar statutes” exist in all other states is insufficient, and they only cited California and Missouri consumer protection law in the complaint. So what was the problem?
2, 2022) The court of appeals upholds the rejection of ThermoLife’s falseadvertising claims (Lanham Act and Florida’s FDUTPA) on statutory standing grounds. Failing Lexmark also meant that plaintiffs failed to meet the standing requirements for common law unfair competition and Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act claims.
Certified alleged Lanham Act falseadvertising based on allegations that the Clorox defendants and Avicenna engaged in a scheme to falselyadvertise the source of chicken collagen used in dietary supplements sold to retail consumers.
25, 2022) I know it probably seems sometimes like I approve of every expansive use of falseadvertisinglaw, but sometimes even I find an aggressive position to go too far. Also, we really need a federal anti-SLAPP law. This was first used by VSL, marketed as VSL#3. Maybe it does, but I have doubts.
The plaintiffs alleged that the stamps themselves were “a powerful form of advertising because they allow the Brazilian plywood companies to market their products as conforming to an important American safety standard.” pictures of not-good plywood from case Plaintiffs alleged both direct and contributory falseadvertising.
30, 2024) (R&R) Recommendation: Dastar should block Qingdao’s Lanham Act falseadvertising counterclaims based on Lashify’s claim to be the originator of lash technology, but false patent marking counterclaims should survive. So false marking as to that was adequately pled. patent law. 2024 WL 629985, No.
Eric Goldman and I are pleased to announce the seventh edition of our casebook, Advertising & MarketingLaw: Cases & Materials. Preface Chapter 1: Overview Chapter 2: What is an Advertisement? Chapter 3: FalseAdvertising Overview Chapter 4: Deception Chapter 5: Which Facts Matter? Email me or Eric!
The first pegfilgrastim biosimilar hit the market in November 2018, and would ultimately be followed by five others, including Sandoz’s Ziextenzo in November 2019. These ads were based on an obseivational study Amgen conducted itself, in an effort to remain competitive with the emerging biosimilar market. Sandoz Inc.
January 5, 2022), the Court granted Defendant Next Caller’s post-trial renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law of no falseadvertising under the Lanham Act and to take away the jury’s award of punitive damages. ” Id. The Court granted Defendant’s motion for two reasons.
The advertising bit: Defendants allegedly misled New York customers into “believing that unfinished frames and receivers are legal workarounds to New York’s gun control laws, as well as federal law.” Defendants contended that marketing unfinished frames and receivers as “legal” was protected by the First Amendment.
The falseadvertising claim fails because Lops didn’t show that the videos “are commercial speech and made for the purpose of influencing consumers to buy YouTube’s goods or services.” YouTube appeared first on Technology & MarketingLaw Blog. ” Cites to Tiffany v. eBay and Sellify v.
27, 2021) A rare choice of law opinion involving competitors. This is a trademark infringement claim but Lontex asserted claims under various state unfair trade practices law. The court declined to allow it to do that and confined it to the law of Pennsylvania, whose UTPCPL does not grant competitors standing.
Because Eli Lilly places patient safety at the forefront, the company has been alarmed by the dangers of Totality Medispa’s products being falselymarketed as FDA-approved tirzepatide, Mounjaro®, or Zepbound®. Any product labeled as “tirzepatide” that is not sold by Lilly is not FDA-approved and could be dangerous.
“But how can the Court permanently enjoin the sales of three specific products, when there is only an allegation or evidence supporting at most one product being falselyadvertised? Plaintiff was required to plead falseadvertising with specificity, then prove it.” It only did so with evidence as to B07ZH6PVD4.
Someone has referred you here because you’ve said something wrong about the laws related to web scraping in the United States. The law related to web scraping is far too nuanced to make such a declarative statement. If you said or implied that the CFAA is the only law that governs web scraping. Don’t worry! You’re not alone.
Toyota USA sued Allen for grey marketing in violation of the Lanham Act and related claims, asserting that material differences included the existence of a manufacturer-backed warranty, the shipping and packaging of the parts, and the appearance and condition of the parts. The court declined to dismiss the counterclaims.
NSF certification is practically required for residential septic systems; at least 37 states have adopted its requirements into law. Unusually, but soundly, the court proceeded to analyze the Michigan common law unfair competition claim separately. Michigan common law does not rely on the words of a statute, let alone a federal one.”
The plaintiff sued HDR for ECPA and common law privacy violations. For similar reasons, the common law claim fails. Is it falseadvertising for Facebook to describe the groups as “private”? Does that create a claim for falseadvertising? The court rejects both claims. Or even 900+? June 8, 2022).
Exclusions for Federal Criminal Law. FalseAdvertising. In general, courts should not permit a falseadvertising claim based on a “safe” representation where the representation is rendered untrue by third-party content. Apple appeared first on Technology & MarketingLaw Blog.
11, 2021) Another timeshare versus timeshare exit falseadvertising case. Marketing Defendants allegedly falselyadvertise timeshare exit services by promoting a legitimate process to exit timeshare contracts. This opinion considered only the marketing defendants.
We usually get ours at the local farmers market.] ” More Posts About Keyword Advertising * Internal Search Results Aren’t Trademark Infringing–PEM v. Brown Engstrand * More on Law Firms and Competitive Keyword Ads–Nicolet Law v. Allied Modular * Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute FalseAdvertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content