This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This one-hour CLE session focuses on defending against falseadvertising and trademark claims, providing practical strategies for brand owners facing allegations of misleading advertising or trademark infringement.
Dawgs’ (“Dawgs”) counterclaim for falseadvertising under the Lanham Act. In 2016, Dawgs added new asserted counterclaims against Crocs, including a claim for falseadvertising under the Lanham Act. The briefs also discuss, to a limited extend, patent law’s false marking statute, 35 U.S.C. §
Skillz sued its competitor Papaya, alleging falseadvertising under federal and state law. The alleged false front website Fair Play for Mobile Games allegedly encouraged and facilitated visitors filing of complaints about mobile gaming companies, other than Skillz and including Papaya, with state attorneys general.
Brough Brothers alleged that Fresh Bourbon falselyadvertised that Fresh Bourbon is the first black-owned bourbon distillery in Kentucky, and made other related claims. State law claims also failed. By December of that year, it had distilled bourbon and filled its first bourbon barrel in a leased Kentucky facility.
Also, in “other cases, the threat of future harm may be the consumer’s plausible allegations that she might purchase the product in the future, despite the fact it was once marred by falseadvertising or labeling, as she may reasonably, but incorrectly, assume the product was improved.”
Unsurprisingly, fraudulent inducement, common-law fraud, and negligent inducement claims survived. the Lanham Act falseadvertising claim survived. Even if that weren’t true, the plaintiff would have standing under the Lanham Act because it lost sales as a result of the Lynd defendants’ falseadvertising.
Is there some “IP Institute” for judges that is replicating the successes of the Law & Econ institutes for judges in convincing them of what the law is? Watkins sued McCormick under the Lanham Act and coordinate state law. The McCormick medium tin was priced at $3.22 while Watkins’s was $1.03. Edriver Inc., 3d 820 (9th Cir.
There’s nothing entailed here about Crocs falsely claiming credit for something someone else did, as there was in Baden where the allegations did at least resemble reverse passing off.] When the Supreme Court left §43(a)(1)(B) claims open in Dastar , this is the kind of thing that fits well.
17, 2023) Another entry in the “courts treat Lanham Act falseadvertising very differently than Lanham Act trademark infringement, despite identical damages provisions” line. CareDx sued Natera for falseadvertising. Natera, Inc., 19-662-CFC, 2023 WL 4561059 (D. Natera made superiority claims for its Prospera.
The court simply responds: “the Ninth Circuit has held that Section 230 immunity applies to falseadvertising claims and other claims that are based on purportedly false representations.” The post Section 230 Helps Amazon Defeat FalseAdvertising Lawsuit Over Printer Ink Cartridges–Planet Green v.
Plaintiffs’ claims sought to hold the dairy farmers directly or contributorily liable under the Lanham Act, and alleged unfair competition/falseadvertising/deceptive trade practices under Hawaii law. Was a false geographic origin claim one for false association, § 1125(a)(1)(A), or falseadvertising, § 1125(a)(1)(B)?
But when advertising or marketing materials overstate the scope of patent or other IP rights, they may create the risk of a falseadvertising claim. Patented technologies or features can be valuable selling points, setting your products apart from the competition. By: Fenwick & West LLP
Rebecca Tushnet and I are pleased to announce the sixth edition of our casebook, Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases & Materials. Chapter 2: What is an Advertisement? Chapter 3: FalseAdvertising Overview. Chapter 9: FalseAdvertising Practice and Remedies. Price: $12. Chapter 4: Deception.
Here, the city successfully wins remand (and a fee award) in this opinion rejecting removal of its falseadvertising suit against Exxon, other fossil fuel companies, and their top trade association for violations of New York City’s Consumer Protection Law. Following a similar case, Connecticut v. Exxon Mobil Corp.,
Vitamins Online sued Heartwise under the Lanham Act and Utah’s Unfair Competition Law for falseadvertising about the ingredients of its competitive nutritional supplements and manipulating those products’ Amazon reviews. Nor was Vitamins Online required to prove a nexus between the falseadvertising and the lost sales.
ZimVie intervened and counterclaimed for declaratory judgment of invalidity, cancellation fo the color marks registration, declaratory judgment of noninfringement, falseadvertising under the Lanham Act and California law, and tortious interference. Intentional interference with prospective economic advantage also survived.
Five 18 is a direct competitor of Wolf that allegedly copied its designs and stole its customers in violation of copyright law and the Lanham Act, and engaged in tortious interference and unfair competition. But what about falseadvertising? The court kicked out some but not all of the claims. Dastar barred a passing off claim.
Rebecca Tushnet and I are pleased to announce the seventh edition of our casebook, Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases & Materials. Preface Chapter 1: Overview Chapter 2: What is an Advertisement? Chapter 3: FalseAdvertising Overview Chapter 4: Deception Chapter 5: Which Facts Matter? Price: $12 * Kindle.
First, the court found that the state consumer protection law claims couldn’t cover the US because it wasn’t enough to allege that “substantially similar statutes” exist in all other states is insufficient, and they only cited California and Missouri consumer protection law in the complaint. So what was the problem?
May 17, 2023) The court grants these timeshare plaintiffs’ motion for a bench trial, ruling that the Seventh Amendment doesn’t guarantee a jury trial in a falseadvertising case where the plaintiffs seek only equitable remedies. Timeshare Lawyers P.A., 2023 WL 3510374, No. 20-24681-Civ-Scola (S.D. Hard Candy, Ltd.
On October 3, 2024, the Federal Circuit held that a falseadvertising cause of action arises where a party falsely claims that it holds a patent on a product feature and advertises the feature in a manner that causes consumers to be misled about the nature, characteristics, or qualities of the product. Crocs, Inc.
Effervescent, the Federal Circuit ruled that falselyadvertising that a product feature is patented can constitute a violation of the Lanham Act. On October 3, 2024, in Crocs v. All the way back in 2006, Crocs sued several competitor shoe distributors for patent infringement. By: Sunstein LLP
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit was tasked with excavating the truth behind claims of falseadvertising and copyright infringement. In a case that pitted two sellers of construction equipment against each other — I Dig Texas, LLC v. Creager — the U.S.
Defendants allegedly copied key components of Trackman’s copyrighted software and falsely suggested, in promotions and advertisements, that defendants were authorized to use the well-known courses in their game. Although the court dismissed a contract claim, copyright and falseadvertising claims survived.
30, 2024) (R&R) Recommendation: Dastar should block Qingdao’s Lanham Act falseadvertising counterclaims based on Lashify’s claim to be the originator of lash technology, but false patent marking counterclaims should survive. So false marking as to that was adequately pled. patent law. 2024 WL 629985, No.
The court granted defendants motion to dismiss the state and federal falseadvertising claims, though other claims remain. As for the job postings, which can be commercial speech, they still werent plausibly published with the purpose of influencing consumers to buy defendants goods or services.
million consent judgment, which defendants touted in a press release and advertised on Zinus’s website even after the court vacated the stipulated judgment. Courts have generally harmonized the Lanham Act with the Patent Act by requiring bad faith before claims about patent infringement can constitute falseadvertising.
A Florida medical spa has settled a federal lawsuit with Houston-based rapper 50 Cent over a photo he took with its owner that was later allegedly used on social media to promote the business' services without his authorization.
The advertising bit: Defendants allegedly misled New York customers into “believing that unfinished frames and receivers are legal workarounds to New York’s gun control laws, as well as federal law.” The complaint plausibly alleged that at least some defendants knowingly evaded federal and state laws. Shalit, 110 A.D.2d
Ford is seeking to stop an aftermarket restoration company from the alleged unauthorized use of the Bronco trademark and trade dress in connection with the rebuild of modern Ford Broncos. The case raises questions of whether brands are doing enough to maintain rights in iconic designs in an increasingly hot marketplace for vintage-inspired goods.
Surviving a 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss and Making FalseAdvertisements Please join us Monday, October 21, 2024, at noon where we will discuss two recent decisions made by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Alexsam, Inc. Aetna, Inc., 22-2036 (Fed. 2024) where the court found in favor of [.]
Injury: Damages and disgorgement under the Lanham Act require injury (for falseadvertising, not trademark infringement, despite the same statutory language covering both; no, I am not going to stop pointing this out any time soon). And economic analysis is a valid means of proving an injury caused by falseadvertising.
NSF certification is practically required for residential septic systems; at least 37 states have adopted its requirements into law. Unusually, but soundly, the court proceeded to analyze the Michigan common law unfair competition claim separately. Michigan common law does not rely on the words of a statute, let alone a federal one.”
Someone has referred you here because you’ve said something wrong about the laws related to web scraping in the United States. The law related to web scraping is far too nuanced to make such a declarative statement. If you said or implied that the CFAA is the only law that governs web scraping. Don’t worry! You’re not alone.
or falseadvertising – the defendant claims to be the ‘inventor of Butter Chicken and Dal Makhani’; or is there an actual ‘invention’ in question – owners of both restaurants call themselves ‘inventors’ of the dish? or the exclusive rights over a recipe – breach of confidentiality?;
Portkey sued for unfair competition/reverse passing off, falseadvertising, and trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, as well as related state-law claims. State law consumer protection claims also failed because they didn’t allege harm to consumers; trademark confusion isn’t sufficient. 23-CV-5074 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y.
At the National Advising Division (NAD), competitors will sometimes go for the brass ring, the big prize, the whole enchilada, and ask the NAD to recommend that an advertiser’s trademarked slogan or even the brand name be discontinued. By: BakerHostetler
The plaintiff sued HDR for ECPA and common law privacy violations. For similar reasons, the common law claim fails. Is it falseadvertising for Facebook to describe the groups as “private”? Does that create a claim for falseadvertising? The court rejects both claims. Or even 900+? June 8, 2022).
The falseadvertising claim fails because Lops didn’t show that the videos “are commercial speech and made for the purpose of influencing consumers to buy YouTube’s goods or services.” YouTube appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. ” Cites to Tiffany v. eBay and Sellify v.
Each side alleged falseadvertising by the other, primarily that each falselyadvertised their products as containing enteric coating, which protects an enzyme from the stomach’s acidic environment and preserves its activity until it reaches the small intestine.
Eric Goldman and I are pleased to announce the seventh edition of our casebook, Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases & Materials. Preface Chapter 1: Overview Chapter 2: What is an Advertisement? Chapter 3: FalseAdvertising Overview Chapter 4: Deception Chapter 5: Which Facts Matter? Price: $12 * Kindle.
The Roundtable is designed to be a forum for the discussion of current trademark, falseadvertising, and right of publicity scholarship, covering a range of methodologies, topics, and perspectives. The Roundtable will cover the travel and lodging expenses for invited authors.
Jordan is a third-year law student at the University of Missouri and a registered patent agent. Before law school, he was a greenskeeper at a local golf course. Guest Post by Jordan Duenckel. He has an extensive background in chemistry and food science.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content