Indiana Intellectual Property Law

DECEMBER 23, 2022

271 , Trademark Infringement, Trademark Counterfeiting, and Unfair Competition, False Designation of Origin, and False Advertising, under 15 U.S.C. §§ 114 and 1125(a). Therefore, Plaintiff is seeking damages for Direct Patent Infringement in violation of 35 U.S.

Trademark 40

Trademark False Advertising Patent Registration 40

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

JANUARY 5, 2022

magna cum laude , from George Mason University School of Law in 2014 and his B.S., Dr. Caleb Bates focuses his practice on intellectual property law, with an emphasis on patent prosecution, strategic counseling, and worldwide patent portfolio management in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology fields. He received his J.D.,

Due Diligence 59

Due Diligence Patent Prosecution Litigation Intellectual Property 59

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

JULY 12, 2024

The complaints allege multiple infringements under federal and state laws, aimed at safeguarding patients from deceptive practices surrounding the FDA-approved medications.

Advertising 52

Advertising Advertising Trademark Law 52

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

MARCH 17, 2023

Fort Wayne, Indiana –The Plaintiff, Roller Ready, LLC , filed suit against Defendants, LA Systems, LLC d/b/a Monkey Rung and Paul Kiley for engaging in false marketing practices, violating the Indiana Deceptive Trade Practices Act, engaging in unfair competition under Indiana common law, and infringing on Roller Ready’s trademark.

Business 40

Business Marketing Marketing Branding 40

SpicyIP

OCTOBER 27, 2023

This violates copyright laws and may lead to legal actions for copyright infringement. False advertising and misleading representations: Dark patterns often involve misleading representations about products, services, or offers.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Designs Design False Advertising 52

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 1, 2023

at 997-98, Rogers limited the application of the Lanham Act’s prohibition on false advertising “to apply to artistic works only where the public interest in avoiding consumer confusion outweighs the public interest in free expression. ” Id. In VIP Products v. Jack Daniels Products , 953 F.3d 3d 1170 , 1172 (9 th Cir.

Trademark 52

Trademark Intellectual Property Branding Branding 52

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 3, 2023

Lemley: is/should there be contributory false advertising liability? We don’t need to reform advertising law; we need to reform agency law. It would be surprising if that didn’t have effects on intellectual property law, for good and for ill. How do they make that happen? Gender and class?

False Advertising 45

False Advertising Trademark Advertising Advertising 45