This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In summer 2020, AHBP began negotiating with the Lynd defendants for the exclusive license to market and sell a surface disinfectant/cleaner known as “Bioprotect 500” in Argentina. Lynd advertised the Product as effective against the coronavirus. the Lanham Act falseadvertising claim survived.
Carrier & Rebecca Tushnet, An Antitrust Framework for FalseAdvertising , 106 Iowa L. 1841 (2021) From the introduction: Federal law presumes that falseadvertising harms competition. Federal law also presumes that falseadvertising is harmless or even helpful to competition.
8, 2023) When does TM logic creep into falseadvertising cases? Faire sued, challenging Tundra’s unauthorized use of Faire’s users’ login credentials to gain access to Faire’s non-public information. Tundra allegedly uses the information it scrapes from Faire’s platform, including contact information, to market its product.
22, 2022) The court here allows an antitrust claim to proceed based in part on allegedly false/misleading statements because they form part of the alleged anticompetitive product-hopping scheme and because the unique characteristics of the drug market make market-based responses to falseadvertising difficult.
Here, the court granted leave to amend to add a falseadvertising claim. One of its most popular products is a line of copper-infused compression clothing, marketed under the trademark “Copper Fit,” allegedly designed to alleviate muscle and joint soreness and pain. Nor would amendment be futile.
7, 2021) Quidel appealed the grant of summary judgment to Siemens on Quidel’s Lanham Act falseadvertising claims and related state claims. Quidel alleged that Siemens advertised (1) but provided (2). And there was no triable issue on actual injury based on allegedly falseadvertising to the physicians.
2, 2021) Rex sued Zillow and the National Association of Realtors for antitrust and falseadvertising violations. Surprisingly, the antitrust claims survive, as do falseadvertising claims agains Zillow. C21-312 TSZ, 2021 WL 3930694 (W.D. NAR “is the nation’s largest trade association for real estate professionals.”
The statements were “commercial advertising meant to sell a product, and generally there ‘can be no constitutional objection to the suppression of commercial messages that do not accurately inform the public.’” Not all marketing of artistic works is noncommercial speech. There was also no copyright preemption.
14, 2022) Once in a blue moon, a falseadvertising-based antitrust claim survives a motion to dismiss in a circuit that imposes a list of excessive requirements on such claims. Consumers and advertisers adequately alleged that Facebook has monopoly power in social network/social media (consumers) and social advertisingmarkets.
7, 2022) The court upheld a contempt finding based on an underlying falseadvertising claim. The underlying permanent injunction barred defendants from suggesting in promotional materials that their probiotic contained the same formulation as one marketed by De Simone. and many markets globally.” “So
25, 2022) I know it probably seems sometimes like I approve of every expansive use of falseadvertising law, but sometimes even I find an aggressive position to go too far. This was first used by VSL, marketed as VSL#3. De Simone created an eight-strain combination probiotic product known as the De Simone Formulation.
The plaintiffs alleged that the stamps themselves were “a powerful form of advertising because they allow the Brazilian plywood companies to market their products as conforming to an important American safety standard.” pictures of not-good plywood from case Plaintiffs alleged both direct and contributory falseadvertising.
to take note: Commerce’s investigation revealed that a Chinese producer markets and sells its wooden cabinets in the United States as maple even though they are made of birch, a less costly grade of wood. Normal value” is generally “the price a producer charges in its home market.” market to the detriment of domestic industry.
Roach, meanwhile, makes frequent use of the phrase “The Unstoppable Entrepreneur” and applied to register the phrase for “Business consultancy; Business marketing consulting services.” Entrepreneur’s desire to bring forth a claim for falseadvertising against a competitor in a similar market is not unusual behavior.”
15, 2023) Simpson sued its competitor MiTek for using Simpson part numbers for structural connectors/fasteners for use in the construction industry in its catalogs/other promotional material; the court here, after a nonjury trial before the magistrate judge, rather comprehensively rejects its falseadvertising, trademark, and copyright claims. (It
Ultra Bond alleged that Safelite violated the Lanham Act by falselyadvertising that windshield cracks longer than six inches could not be safely repaired and instead required replacement of the entire windshield. Safelite is the VGRR market leader: in 2016, it had 35.4% of the market; its closest competitor had just 3%.
11, 2021) Another timeshare versus timeshare exit falseadvertising case. Marketing Defendants allegedly falselyadvertise timeshare exit services by promoting a legitimate process to exit timeshare contracts. This opinion considered only the marketing defendants.
The result is that FedEx routes are, as a practical matter, intangible commodities traded on a competitive market and subject to price fluctuation based on the actual or perceived value of each individual route. The only information that FedEx has pleaded about margins was based on a sample of 100 ISPs, not on the “average” CSP.
And plaintiffs’ allegations do not establish that Apple created the Toast Plus app; rather, it was created by another information content provider and thus meets the third prong of the Barnes test. FalseAdvertising. Apple appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. eBay case from 2008. Apple, Inc.
WatsonSeal Marketing LLC v. 15, 2023) When is informational material related to a for-profit company’s business commercial speech? Church even describes LumberKote as “a fine product” that, “like everything” on the market, “is only as good as it’s installed.” Crawlspace Ninja IP LLC, 2023 WL 2533061, No. 5:22-cv-649-LCB (N.D.
The Roundtable is designed to be a forum for the discussion of current trademark, falseadvertising, and right of publicity scholarship, covering a range of methodologies, topics, and perspectives. Participation at the Roundtable will be limited and invitation-only and we expect all participants to have read the papers in advance.
Shingle Savers counterclaimed, alleging, among other things, falseadvertising under the Lanham Act and violation of the Ohio Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Moreover, the alleged misrepresentations concerned the nature of Roof Maxx’s own roofing Product and were presented in official marketing material and conversations.
Is it falseadvertising for Facebook to describe the groups as “private”? Does that create a claim for falseadvertising? it might very well want to deploy more visible disclosures informing users what “private” means and doesn’t mean. June 8, 2022). The complaint.
30, 2022) Pegasystems alleged that defendants, which compete with it in the business process management (BPM) software field, engaged in falseadvertising and commercial disparagement in an online report that portrayed Pegasystems unfavorably. Appian disseminated the report through its sales team, social media, and other marketing.
Pandora Marketing, LLC, 2021 WL 1573073, CV 20-5486 DSF (ADSx) (C.D. Here, Diamond sued both the marketers who seek exit clients and also the lawyers who worked with them. Regardless of which standard applied, Diamond successfully alleged contributory falseadvertising. Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC v.
This was allegedly still false and misleading, and First Databank allegedly falselyadvertised that it “compile[s]” the relevant information in its database and for its coding determinations from the FDA and from manufacturers, such as Alfasigma. NutriSearch Corp., 3d 1107 (9th Cir.
May 18, 2023) New Vision, an eye-care professional and provider of optical goods and services, including contact lens fittings and contact lens sales with seven brick-and-mortar locations and two websites, brought a putative class action against four online contact-lens retailers for Lanham Act falseadvertising.
Verify the third-party seller’s identity, principal place of business, and contact information through “reliable documentation, including to the extent possible some form of government-issued identification.” [Just wait until other countries require the equivalent from US-based online sellers on foreign marketplaces.
The Roundtable is designed to be a forum for the discussion of current trademark, falseadvertising, and right of publicity scholarship, covering a range of methodologies, topics, and perspectives. Participation at the Roundtable will be limited and invitation-only and we expect all participants to have read the papers in advance.
I’m only going to discuss the false association/falseadvertising bits; as to the latter, state law provides more protection than federal because of the “commercial advertising or promotion” requirement for Lanham Act falseadvertising. The false association/coordinate state law claims survived.
23, 2024) Plaintiffs alleged that defendants conspired to inflate the US News ranking of USC Rossier School of Education by submitting inaccurate or incomplete data to US News and market the resulting ranking to the public. As Plaintiffs note, if the law were otherwise, “any business that submits falseinformation to get a certification.
29, 2021) CHD, an anti-vaccination group (that also considers pesticides and wireless tech dangerous), sued Facebook and other defendants for violating the First and Fifth Amendments, Lanham Act falseadvertising, and RICO violations. It didn’t like having some of its content on its FB page labeled “false,” out of date, or unreliable.
We invite submissions from academics working on any aspect of trademark, falseadvertising, marketing, right of publicity, or related areas of the law. Participation at the Roundtable will be limited and invitation-only and we expect all participants to have read the papers in advance.
11, 2025) This discovery dispute says some interesting things about gray market goods. Thus, the information Toyota sought about supplier warranties was irrelevant. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Allen Interchange LLC, 2025 WL 465815, No. 22-cv-1681 (KMM/JFD) (D. but without a resultant detectable difference in the product itself.
Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liab. SoClean is a dominant player in the market for medical devices that sanitize continuous positive airway pressure machines (CPAPs), which treat sleep apnea and respiratory conditions. And, they continued, SoClean was illegally marketing its devices. In re SoClean, Inc., 22-542 (W.D.
Drug manufacturers still need an NDA or ANDA to sell their drugs, but, during the pendency of an open DESI proceeding, the FDA permits the subject product or drug to remain on the market. They are therefore allowed on the market during the DESI review pendency and qualify as pharmaceutically equivalent.
We invite submissions from academics working on any aspect of trademark, falseadvertising, marketing, right of publicity, or related areas of the law. Participation at the Roundtable will be limited and invitation-only and we expect all participants to have read the papers in advance.
.” With respect to policy, the majority goes property-absolutist: “Because state property rights can facilitate market exchange, interpreting the § 230(e)(2) limitation to include state intellectual property laws tracks Congress’s pro-free-market goal.” I even agree with the latter point!) Facebook , Nos.
Plaintiffs allegedly saw the representations on the “product labels and otherwise” on Amazon’s site and believed “that the [p]roducts harbored therapeutic value, and/or they and the marketing claims were reviewed and approved by the FDA.”
Nursing CE Central” is a descriptive mark with “a weak secondary meaning… the plaintiff makes no meaningful showing that the public, or even those in the market in which it competes, readily recognizes its name.” ” Marketing channel. Allied Modular * Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute FalseAdvertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet
9, 2023) Along with updating its previous decision (I didn’t see anything that affected the Lanham Act analysis of the key issue of whether a retailer can sue a supplier for falseadvertising), the court addressed a motion to dismiss by defendant ViaClean.
The court says it needs more information to understand the call logs. of exposed consumers experienced actual confusion: This tiny percentage cannot reasonably be said to constitute an “appreciable” or “significant” number of consumers confused by Defendants’ advertising strategy. The court doesn’t dig into that question further.
The parties compete in the market for skid steer attachments and other products. Creager sells Montana post drivers (made in China) that compete with the Texas post drivers sold by IDT (advertised as made in the USA). The parties had other disputes, including accusing each other of posting false reviews of the other.
Elysium argued that Right of Assembly was “a marketing website for Tru Niagen for which ChromaDex pays commissions to Shelly Albaum for Tru Niagen customers referred through the website.” Thus, any falseadvertising claim would lie against Albaum, not [directly] against ChromaDex. It was also first to market.)
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content