This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
12, 2023) Following a large verdict for Monster on falseadvertising claims, this opinion discusses extensively the requirements for injunctive relief in falseadvertising cases. Plus, they hadn’t removed existing falseadvertising from their socialmedia accounts. and] expects to complete.
30, 2024) (R&R) Recommendation: Dastar should block Qingdao’s Lanham Act falseadvertising counterclaims based on Lashify’s claim to be the originator of lash technology, but false patent marking counterclaims should survive. 1, 2017 to Apr. 11, 2023 (claiming that various products were “patented”).
Advertising can take many forms, including statements about a company’s products on websites and socialmedia platforms. In this 60-minute webinar, designed exclusively for in-house counsel, you will learn how you can protect your company against legal challenges based on its advertising practices.
For example, socialmedia has been widely discussing the impact of micro-plastics on the environment and contemplating methods to reduce its release. Today, greenwashing has taken over green trademarks as well, for their ability to attract consumer attention and avail government granted incentives.
5, 2023) Hicks alleged that defendant, a California agricultural corporation, misrepresented the environmental impact of its farming practices through its advertising and “Inaugural Report on Environmental, Social and Governance Actions.” She brought the usual California statutory claims.
30, 2022) Pegasystems alleged that defendants, which compete with it in the business process management (BPM) software field, engaged in falseadvertising and commercial disparagement in an online report that portrayed Pegasystems unfavorably. Appian disseminated the report through its sales team, socialmedia, and other marketing.
Variations in different marketing campaigns and channels (socialmedia versus traditional media) did not defeat predominance. She opined on the youth-focused marketing of JUUL, and JLI criticized her for, among other things, not distinguishing between JUUL’s own content and third-party socialmedia not under JLI’s control.
I’m ignoring the complicating effects of various socialmedia censorship laws that may require Internet services to enforce their TOSes as written, a requirement I think is unconstitutional). It was an easy dismissal in Noah, and it remains an easy dismissal now. (I’m
The court certified a question to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court: Under what circumstances, if any, is material publicly posted to socialmedia platforms inherently unknowable for purposes of applying the discovery rule in the context of defamation, right to publicity, right to privacy and related tort claims?
Plaintiff WATL is allegedly the preeminent governing body and league for the sport of axe throwing and uses the trademark “WATL” to market and publicize the axe throwing league. Cold Steel Inc., 2023 WL 2372059, No. 2:20−cv−11407 JAK (Ex) (C.D. First, nominative fair use permits only the “truthful use of a mark.” Toyota, 610 F.3d 3d at 1177.
An online article used photos of the Lounge in its coverage of the series, and MGFB also submitted socialmedia posts. Plaintiffs’ socialmedia expert opined that the show meant that Internet searches for “Florabama” or “Flora-Bama” led to “blurred” results filled with MTV Floribama Shore content. Tam, 137 S.
Since early 2020, Defendant Nepute and Quickwork have used several platforms, including socialmedia, emails, and radio, to tout the purported benefits of Vitamin D and zinc and to promote Wellness Warrior supplements. ” The government can show either falsity/misleadingness or lack of substantiation to prevail.
The relevant rules governing the division- Madras High Court Intellectual Property Division Rules, 2022 were notified on April 6, 2023, which were prepared keeping in mind the 158 years history of the High Court and were drafted to address the concerns of IP litigants consequent to the abolition of the IPAB. d) Other IP Developments 1.
Socialmedia influencers seem reasonably held liable, but what about when the seller is texting friends. Lemley: is/should there be contributory falseadvertising liability? We don’t need to reform advertising law; we need to reform agency law. How do they make that happen? Gender and class?
” “I am a law professor who teaches and writes about intellectual property and entertainment law with a focus on trademarks and falseadvertising, particularly online.” I think the internet in general an[d] SocialMedia and AI specifically, should be open to the 1st amendment and not interfered by government.
At a more theoretical level, these algorithmically optimized registrations help show why applications have spiked so much—other important institutions, like Amazon and the Chinese government, are using the PTO for their own purposes. AJ Press LLC, F.Supp.3d 3d -, 2021 WL 3356848, No. 21-cv-03010-SVW-MAR (C.D.
The question is then whether the censorship can be excused due to concerns that the Chinese government (PRC) might effectuate a covert influence operation by manipulating the algorithms against America’s interests. We know that foreign governments have tried to manipulate our elections and will continue to do so.
Unsurprisingly, these shifts largely follow political lines — Democrat-led state attorney general (AG) offices are no longer expending countless resources challenging Trump, while Republican-led AG offices have picked up the mantle of opposing the federal government. 4: Early Opioid Medication Litigation Rulings Favor Advertisers.
Malwarebytes, which allowed a falseadvertising claim to proceed based on one software provider’s use of the terms “malicious” and “threat” to describe its alleged competitor’s software, despite a dissent raising free speech arguments. Then I’ll talk about the 9 th Circuit case Enigma Software v.
This is one of the many AG enforcement actions against socialmedia for [reasons]. In this particular claim, the Indiana AG alleges that TikTok coaxed users to install its app on false pretenses, including deceptive omissions about its ties to China. The lower court dismissed the case. The appeals court revives it.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content