This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Dawgs’ (“Dawgs”) counterclaim for falseadvertising under the Lanham Act. In 2016, Dawgs added new asserted counterclaims against Crocs, including a claim for falseadvertising under the Lanham Act. Crocs largely prevailed in those actions. See Zenith Elecs. Exzec, Inc. , 3d 1340 (Fed.
In summer 2020, AHBP began negotiating with the Lynd defendants for the exclusive license to market and sell a surface disinfectant/cleaner known as “Bioprotect 500” in Argentina. Lynd advertised the Product as effective against the coronavirus. the Lanham Act falseadvertising claim survived.
12, 2023) Following a large verdict for Monster on falseadvertising claims, this opinion discusses extensively the requirements for injunctive relief in falseadvertising cases. Are lost prospective customers and market share purely economic harms? So too with lost market share. and] expects to complete.
The statements were “commercial advertising meant to sell a product, and generally there ‘can be no constitutional objection to the suppression of commercial messages that do not accurately inform the public.’” Not all marketing of artistic works is noncommercial speech. There was also no copyright preemption. 3d 1146 (9th Cir.
As far as the Court can tell, … PIRG does no work addressing false or misleading labeling for bed sheets, textiles more generally, or even falseadvertising as a category. Does that mean every cy pres recipient has to be newly created? The cy pres doctrine simply allows for a distribution that achieves those benefits indirectly.”
30, 2024) (R&R) Recommendation: Dastar should block Qingdao’s Lanham Act falseadvertising counterclaims based on Lashify’s claim to be the originator of lash technology, but false patent marking counterclaims should survive. Qingdao Lashbeauty Cosmetic Co., 2024 WL 629985, No. W-22-CV-00776-ADA-DTG, No. 1, 2017 to Apr.
Defendants contended that marketing unfinished frames and receivers as “legal” was protected by the First Amendment. Defendants contended that marketing unfinished frames and receivers as “legal” was protected by the First Amendment. First, the marketing was commercial speech: “NO FFL Required!” It was not. NO Registering.
30, 2022) Pegasystems alleged that defendants, which compete with it in the business process management (BPM) software field, engaged in falseadvertising and commercial disparagement in an online report that portrayed Pegasystems unfavorably. Appian disseminated the report through its sales team, social media, and other marketing.
This is a falseadvertising lawsuit again the mobile app game Game of Thrones: Conquest. Many sites have multiple overlapping governance documents with similar names, so it’s fair for consumers to expect accurate specificity. appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. The district court disagreed.
2, 2023) A smoothly written opinion: As the complaint tells it, Paul Mitchell has long marketed its business and its products as “cruelty-free.” Although not all the purchased products appeared in the Chinese import registry, “in its marketing, Paul Mitchell doesn’t just advertise that it sells ‘cruelty-free’ goods.
29, 2021) CHD, an anti-vaccination group (that also considers pesticides and wireless tech dangerous), sued Facebook and other defendants for violating the First and Fifth Amendments, Lanham Act falseadvertising, and RICO violations. It didn’t like having some of its content on its FB page labeled “false,” out of date, or unreliable.
Based on the ccBill precedent, a number of Ninth Circuit-governed courts have applied Section 230 to publicity rights claims. ” Not only has it been proven a zillion times that property rights often harm free markets, but this concern doesn’t fit Hepp’s situation at all. See, e.g., Ripple v. Facebook , Nos.
Drug manufacturers still need an NDA or ANDA to sell their drugs, but, during the pendency of an open DESI proceeding, the FDA permits the subject product or drug to remain on the market. State law governs how and when pharmacists and health care professionals can and must make generic substitutions.
Apart from the growing interest of the consumers towards environmentally conscious purchases, various governments all over the world are offering incentives to companies that promote the ideology through their products and services to prioritize environmental protection.
15, 2024) Pacira, which sells non-opioid pain management products, including Exparel, sued Nephron for falseadvertising. Despite the plausibility of these arguments, the court adopted the rule that “the law does not impute representations of government approval. What about “commercial advertising or promotion”?
The complaint didn’t identify specific advertising statements that would plausibly misrepresent what the Zestimates were, “or even a particular home estimate produced by the Zestimate tool that allegedly conflicts with the real market value.” CUTPA: Covers both deceptiveness and unfairness.
Bimbo sells Grandma Sycamore’s Home-Maid Bread; it sued defendants, who include the baker who developed the Grandma Sycamore’s recipe, for trade secret misappropriation, trade dress infringement, and falseadvertising when it sold a comparable bread product, Grandma Emilie’s, with the tagline “Fresh. For example, in the McNeil v.
And then…the Ninth Circuit got the case again… The Majority Opinion After the Supreme Court cert denial, the district court ruled that Malwarebytes’ “malicious” and “threat” classifications were “non-actionable statements of opinion” and thus could not support a Lanham Act falseadvertising claim.
Currently, Bhaker is managed by iOS Sports & Entertainment, who released a statement calling such unauthorized advertising as “moment marketing free of cost,” and issued a legal notice to the above brands to take such commercials down, contending that such advertisements violated their ownership of Bhaker’s personality rights.
We will use real-life false-advertising cases litigated over the past few years to illustrate the successful and unsuccessful claims and defenses and to inform webinar attendees of the currently active areas of advertising litigation. Mital Patel , Associate, Foley Hoag LLP. Jennifer Yoo, Associate, Foley Hoag LLP.
It apparently held that there were “compelling reasons to conclude that claims based on the validity of the Parikh Study—or any other peer-reviewed, non-fraudulent scientific study—are likely ‘non-actionable’ in the context of falseadvertising.” The claims were plausible under either ONY or the the [governing?]
Roughly: Orthodontists accused SDC of falselyadvertising its plastic aligners as equivalent to traditional orthodontic treatment. Instead, they were arguing that SDC’s marketing misled consumers about its FDA clearance status. Citing JHP Pharms., Hospira, Inc., 3d 992, 1000 (C.D. meets the agency’s.
But if I stopped what I was doing to write a personal message every time I saw a blogger with no legal background shilling for a web-scraping company or a half-asleep aggregator journalist [FN] spewing ignorance online about the laws that govern web scraping, I wouldn’t get out much.
24, 2021) Plaintiffs sought class certification of their falseadvertising claims based on the claims that KIND falselyadvertised “All Natural / Non-GMO,” “Non-GMO,” and “No Genetically Engineered Ingredients”; KIND sought to exclude expert reports. In re KIND LLC “Healthy and All Natural” Litig., 2021 WL 1132147, Nos.
Defendant SBC sent a ninety-page document titled “Design Manual” to at least six prospective clients, including the statement: “These patented methods have now been tested and qualified for use on projects in accordance with governing building codes (AISC 341).” Similarity of products/marketing favored Core-Brace, because the parties compete.
Businesses harm consumers only in a few ways—falseadvertising, monopoly prices, defective products. If the law says that Google is a common carrier, expecting more speech governance is irrational. Q: As a marketing professor, the word I say every day is Google. What are you going to do instead, advertise on Bing?
12, 2022) Many FDA-related falseadvertising claims about pharmaceuticals are preempted because of the special role FDA plays in regulating them, but not all, as this case explains, applying Pom Wonderful to the pharmaceutical context. Azurity sells a hydrochloride vancomycin drug that received FDA pre-market approval.
6, 2023) Norman sued Gerber for allegedly falselyadvertising its baby food/infant formula products as “NON GMO Not Made With Genetically Engineered Ingredients” on the front of the package, and also on the back above the ingredients list. Gerber Prods. 2023 WL 122910, No. 21-cv-09940-JSW (N.D.
Those same labels often conspicuously say “dietary supplement,” “fluoride supplement,” and include a “Supplement Facts” panel, but Method alleged that nevertheless, the market considers H-2’s products to be prescription drugs and treats them accordingly. H-2 also argued that the entire context of the label wasn’t false or misleading.
Marketing, Sales Practices & Prods. 23, 2022) Manufacturers lose an opportunity to create a circuit split on whether overpaying for a product that generally has a defect, which defect did not manifest for the class plaintiffs but plausibly reduced the value of the product, provides standing for a falseadvertising monetary relief claim.
Tofurky has never been the subject of enforcement action by any federal agency for marketing or labeling its products in a misleading manner. Plus, its labels and marketing materials prominently identified its products as “all vegan,” “plant based,” “vegetarian,” “veggie,” or “made with pasture raised plants” on the front of its packages.
Also last year, in discussing Environmental, Social, and Governance factors (ESG), then-Acting Chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Allison Herren Lee observed that “climate risks and sustainability are critical issues for the investing public and our capital markets.” sustainable). million in penalties.
This claim was based on carbon offsetting via participation in the voluntary carbon offset market. Berrin alleged that “foundational issues with the voluntary carbon offset market make it impossible to make a company carbon-neutral with the purchase of offsets.”
Under the Green Guides, “marketers can make unqualified recyclable claims” only “[w]hen recycling facilities are available to a substantial majority of consumers or communities where the item is sold.” They add that “[i]f any component significantly limits the ability to recycle the item, any recyclable claim would be deceptive.
The court held that since it does not have the statistical data regarding market presence of other pharmaceutical compounds, the brand names that ends with “Dex” and when one removes from the cited examples the products containing dexamethasone and dextromethorphan, the remaining examples cannot make out a case u/s 17(2).
Touro’s online program was allegedly marketed and priced as a “separate and distinct product[ ]” and bore no fees for in-person services. No reasonable consumer would be misled into believing that, in the event of a global pandemic and under government shutdown orders, TCDM would remain open to deliver in-person instruction to students.”
Publix Super Markets, Inc., The court imagined a hypothetical where the federal government said things to park visitors like “don’t feed the bears” and “stay on the paths” and the state then wanted to add a “don’t swim in the rivers” rule. But Bell v. 3d 468 (7th Cir. I agree, it’s a super important question!
Marketing Sales Practices & Prods. Plaintiffs moved to certify four classes of purchasers of JUUL products on “theories that defendants’ marketing of JUUL was unlawfully deceptive, JUUL was unlawfully marketed to youth, and JUUL products are not fit for ordinary use.” In Re Juul Labs, Inc., I don't even have a RICO tag!
24, 2022) Plaintiffs brought the usual California claims in this putative class action challenging use of the term “Health-Ade” to market kombucha-inspired beverages, including Health-Ade Kombucha, Health-Ade Plus, Health-Ade Booch Pop, Health-Ade pop, and Health-Ade Mixers. Health-Ade LLC, F.Supp.3d 3d -, 2022 WL 562827, No.
Marketing materials related to the 2016 version designate the same three valleys as “Regions of Origin,” and describes them as “premiere growing regions along Oregon’s coast.” In 2018, the federal government forced Copper Cane to alter the labels after determining that they were misleading. with “Purely Elouan, Always Coastal.”
Martelly allegedly “promoted, marketed, advertised and sold” the Fees to the public as necessary “to finance free education for impoverished children,” knowing that wasn’t true: a program to fund free education in Haiti allegedly does not exist. Martelly, F.Supp.3d 3d -, 2023 WL 6385 (E.D.N.Y.
During the proceedings, the Court observed and penalised the Defendants for falseadvertising and contemptuous conduct. The Defendants’ inconsistent representation and sporadic appearance in court indicated a disregard for legal obligations.
29, 2021) Plaintiffs alleged that Kodiak was liable for “(1) non-functional slack fill and (2) deceptive marketing practices” for its pancake and waffle mixes. Defendant misleadingly labels and advertises its products as having “no preservatives” as well as being “free of artificial additives,” “non-GMO,” “healthy,” and “protein-packed.”
“Here, Nextiva’s experts used regression analyses to show that traffic to RingCentral’s web pages closely coincided with reduced Nextiva sales, and that Nextiva would have to spend significant funds to correct the misimpressions that RingCentral’s pages caused in the market.”
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content