This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
However, the announcement was made through a socialmedia post by the Minister and no official statement has been published on the website. The unauthorized commercial exploitation of Late Ratan Tatas name and image was also recognized as a violation of personalityrights. Read for more on this update!
Tejas Misra explains why and how these seemingly innocuous posts may infringe on the shooter’s personalityrights. It was submitted that the Plaintiff’s platform uses real money and misrepresentation by the defendant could cause harm to the Plaintiff. Terex India Private Limited vs Cde Asia Ltd. &
From Big-B Baritone to Anil Kapoor’s Jhakaas, the life of Personalityrights : Since Shouvik’s 2010 post about Amitabh Bachhan’s concern over the use of his voice to sell Gutka (an addictive substance), we have come to a long way! Speaking of late movie stars, one may wonder about the posthumous enforcement of celebrity rights.
The defendant argued that since the plaintiff’s work was exhibited in public its reproduction will fall under the ambit of fairuse. A Division Bench of the Delhi High Court to hear appeal against the Single Judge order in the Sushant Singh Rajput personalityrights case.
[Delhi High Court] On September 20, the Delhi High Court granted relief to film actor Anil Kapoor against the unauthorised use of his image, name, voice, and other traits of his persona for monetary gain, reinforcing his personalityrights. Acko General Insurance. Delhi High Court passed an interesting order in Anubhav Jain v.
For non-celebrities, it can prevent emotional distress caused by unauthorized use of their identity. International Variations: Similar rights exist in other countries, often referred to as “personalityrights” or “rights of persona.” Sony Music Entm’t, Inc. , 3d 1134, 1145 (9th Cir.
In recent times, the Delhi High Court has been spewing out decisions involving the PersonalityRights of celebrities. We had the Anil Kapoor decision last year and similar rulings followed in 2024 dealing with the rights of Jackie Shroff , Vishnu Manchu , Arijit Singh.
In a “Jhakaas” (a slang for fantastic) news for the actor Anil Kapoor, Delhi High Court granted the actor an interim injunction against use/ misuse of his personalityrights. Image from here Image Rights Alright—But Can They Trump Established Rights and Doctrines? Fans, starved for glimpses of their idols.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content