This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A screenshot from the (now deleted) socialmedia video at the center of the controversy. In May, State Farm filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit (read here) , arguing that Atari was “seeking a windfall for the inadvertent and fleeting use of a decades-old arcade game.”
The parties had other disputes, including accusing each other of posting false reviews of the other. IDT removed its “Made in USA” advertising in the first 8 months of 2022, and its on-line sales increased during that time period. The ads used the entire images. There’s more, including public disputes on Craigslist.
WowWee’s Vice President of Brand Development & Creative Strategy, Sydney Wiseman, used her WowWee email address to create a Roblox user account and used her Roblox account to promote My Avastars dolls on socialmedia, including videos on her TikTok account.
To make matters worse, State Farm’s resident do-gooder “Jake” lands a Fonzie-style smack on the Crystal Castles machine to get it working—”suggesting falsely and disparagingly to consumers that Atari’s cabinets are low-quality, faulty, and/or unreliable.”
Maybe companies can resurrect noncompetes by prohibiting uses of their trademarks in former employees’ resumes! Portkey sued for unfair competition/reverse passing off, falseadvertising, and trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, as well as related state-law claims. Venkateswaran, 2024 WL 3487735, No.
28, 2022) Chanel sued What Goes Around Comes Around (WGACA), alleging trademark infringement, falseadvertising, false association/endorsement, and related NY GBL claims for deceptive/unfair trade practices and falseadvertising. Until 2017, it also used the hashtag #WGACACHANEL in its socialmedia posts.
May 19, 2023) Whereas the timeshare falseadvertising cases might be making law largely applicable to other timeshare cases, what’s going on in the strip club advertising cases might have somewhat broader implications. The district court concluded that plaintiffs’ false endorsement claims were foreclosed by Electra v.
Mary Katherine Amerine, Reasonably Careless Consumers in TM & FalseAdvertising How do courts treat consumers in TM and falseadvertising cases? Falseadvertisinguses v different framework: consider the challenged ad as a whole, including disclaimers and qualifying language. Dougies for diapers.
First, nominative fairuse permits only the “truthful use of a mark.” Toyota, 610 F.3d 3d at 1177. Defendants contended that one axe “meet[s] WATL Regulations” and that another “meets WATL Regulations with a slight modification that is commonly made.”
but also narrows the issues somewhat; the larger infringement, cybersquatting, and falseadvertising claims can’t be resolved on summary judgment. Even if they were generic uses, two articles and one opinion weren’t sufficient to overcome the “strong presumption” of validity of a registered mark. But is it a nominative fairuse?
Matthew Sag, Copyright Safety for Generative AI Not addressing whether training is always fairuse in every circumstance; explain how generative AI fits w/in existing law (nonexpressive uses) and identify best practices to make generative AI fairer. Implications: too much memorization undermines arguments in favor of fairuse.
These guidelines target practices such as false urgency, basket sneaking, subscription traps, confirm shaming, forced actions, nagging, interface interference, bait and switch, hidden costs, and disguised ads. d) Other IP Developments 1. Acko General Insurance. Delhi High Court passed an interesting order in Anubhav Jain v.
Across-the-board socialmedia and influencer marketing integration are aspects of the present-day artificiality regarding persuasive brand dissemination in faces and identities. Trademarks Scars on SocialMedia It defies law in this modern digital age. It has also brought a lot of challenges.
For about a decade, courts had realized that IIC had gone way too far, and had expanded liability in ways that didn’t protect consumers and facilitated anticompetitive claims about falseadvertising. It then sued the City for this Instagram post, alleging that it would cause confusion about affiliation or sponsorship.
Malwarebytes, which allowed a falseadvertising claim to proceed based on one software provider’s use of the terms “malicious” and “threat” to describe its alleged competitor’s software, despite a dissent raising free speech arguments. Then I’ll talk about the 9 th Circuit case Enigma Software v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content