This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
By: Sharon Urias, Esq. In May 2016, Delta Air Lines (“Delta”) filed a federal lawsuit, Delta v. Fly Tech LLC et al., against a number of associated travel websites (Triposaver.com, Triptkt.com, Flyairs.com, Webflyts.com, and Easyflightdeals.com) (the “Websites”) with allegations of fraud, unjust enrichment, unfair competition, trademark infringement, and trademark counterfeiting.
In response to a rise in craft beer trademark disputes, research scientist Janelle Shane recently set loose a "neural network" – a type of computer program that can "learn" from data sets that are given to it – to create new craft beer names. The thought was that the computer program could learn from thousands of existing beer names, and come up with a long list of new ones built on detected patterns.
By: Sharon Urias, Esq. In 2013, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) introduced a new rule requiring applicants who appeal a USPTO decision to a federal district court to pay the USPTO’s legal bills. This means even if the applicant wins its appeal in federal court, it must pay the USPTO’s legal fees. Not surprisingly, it did not take long for the legal challenges to follow.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content