This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Prior blog post. Alexander inked 6 tattoos on wrestler Randy Orton. Videogames featured Orton and his tattoos, and Alexander sued for copyright infringement. A jury ruled for Alexander and awarded $3,750 in damages. The defendants sought to overturn the jury verdict. The denial of fair use stands, but the damages get zeroed out. Fair Use Nature of Use “Defendants’ use of the tattoos was clearly commercial.” Really?
As the financial stakes increase and rightsholders become increasingly desperate to suppress piracy, the nature of information delivered to the media demands scrutiny like never before. Almost all major announcements are geared to elicit a prescribed response, as part of an overall strategy to shape public opinion while delivering on various policy goals.
Atari’s copyright infringement lawsuit against State Farm advances, underscoring the importance of careful clearance in advertising. It looks like Jake from State Farm is definitely going to blow through his deductible, as the insurance giant lost its bid to declare game over on a lawsuit brought by video game publisher Atari Interactive. On Friday, a Texas federal judge dismissed much of the case but kept Atari’s core copyright infringement claim in play.
Originally posted 2011-05-03 23:40:13. Republished by Blog Post Promoter An odd little display at a garden center in Clifton, New Jersey. The post Trademarks of yesterday appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™.
Software is complex, which makes threats to the software supply chain more real every day. 64% of organizations have been impacted by a software supply chain attack and 60% of data breaches are due to unpatched software vulnerabilities. In the U.S. alone, cyber losses totaled $10.3 billion in 2022. All of these stats beg the question, “Do you know what’s in your software?
On day one of IPWatchdog’s 2024 LIVE program, Joseph Allen of the Bayh-Dole Coalition became the fourth recipient of the annual Paul Michel award and was dubbed “a hero to American innovation” by Judge Michel himself. The Paul Michel Award, created with the blessing of Chief Judge Paul Michel (U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuiy, ret.), is awarded annually to a respected industry leader and advocate for fairness.
Any educator who has spent time preparing lessons and searching for content will tell you that quick, easy access to high-quality, diverse, and engaging content is essential. But quite often the content, much of it found online and freely available, is of varying quality and doesn’t undergo the same rigorous process of expert review as traditionally published materials.
The proposed rule changes to Terminal Disclaimers to overcome double patenting have not yet been finalized. If the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) decides to finalize these changes as the next step in its dreams of slaying the demons of high drug prices with a single blow by extorting concessions from patent applicants in terminal disclaimers, those finalized rules will be challenged.
The proposed rule changes to Terminal Disclaimers to overcome double patenting have not yet been finalized. If the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) decides to finalize these changes as the next step in its dreams of slaying the demons of high drug prices with a single blow by extorting concessions from patent applicants in terminal disclaimers, those finalized rules will be challenged.
This Kat has always found Japanimation to his liking, particularly the films produced by Studio Ghibli. Their films and characters ( e.g., Kiki , Calcifer , No Face , Totoro ) are simply great. The Opposition Division of the European Union Intellectual Property Office has recently issued a ruling on a figurative mark registered in 2020 by Studios Ghibli.
Here is our recap of last week’s top IP developments including summary of the posts on the Delhi High Court’s Oppo decision, Calcutta High Court IPD Rules, Central Government’s executive order on clinical trial waiver. This and a lot more in this week’s SpicyIP Weekly Review. Anything we are missing out on? Drop a comment below to let us know.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
116 
Let's personalize your content