This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Real-Debrid is nifty tool that provides access to premium and unrestricted downloads from a variety of file hosting and torrent websites. The popular download service operates as a middleman to access file-hosting platforms, for example, and also uses cached content to stream content from torrent sites instantly. These features appear to be quite appealing to pirates.
Xockets, Inc. recently filed a complaint in the Western District of Texas against NVIDIA Corporation (“NVIDIA”), Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) and RPX Corporation (“RPX”) (collectively, “Defendants”) for alleged patent infringement and violation of federal antitrust laws. As is often the case in patent cases, Xockets seeks an injunction in addition to monetary damages.
Effective January 19, 2025, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) will increase patent fees and even create some new ones. A Final Rule, issued Nov. 20, instituted a 7.5% across-the-board increase with new utility applications increasing by about 10%. In addition, the USPTO included certain "targeted adjustments" for fees that will increase by significantly greater percentages, including some new fees that have never been charged before.
Erik shares important things to know when it comes to renewing a trademark registration in this episode. The post 25 Trademark Renewal Tips appeared first on Erik M Pelton & Associates, PLLC. Erik shares important things to know when it comes to renewing a trademark registration in this episode.
Software is complex, which makes threats to the software supply chain more real every day. 64% of organizations have been impacted by a software supply chain attack and 60% of data breaches are due to unpatched software vulnerabilities. In the U.S. alone, cyber losses totaled $10.3 billion in 2022. All of these stats beg the question, “Do you know what’s in your software?
In the era of digital economy, the blooming of digital products has led to the widespread implementation of technical measures to protect these products from unauthorized use. Rights holders frequently employ these measures to safeguard their digital products, such as software applications, digital games, and multimedia content. However, many infringers use illegal means to “crack” these protective measures, even manufacture and distribute tools designed to “crack” them for personal gains.
AWGI, LLC and Atlas Van Lines, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) have filed a lawsuit against Atlas Mover Group LLC (“AMG”) and United Best Moving LLC (“UBM”) (“Defendants”) for trademark infringement and unfair competition. Plaintiffs claim that Defendants are unlawfully using the “Atlas” mark, which is associated with decades of goodwill and recognition in the moving and storage industry.
Strike 3 Holdings is an adult pornography company located in California that has literally filed over 10,000 federal court copyright infringement cases across the United States for nearly a decade now. No company files more lawsuits (to my knowledge) than this company does.
Strike 3 Holdings is an adult pornography company located in California that has literally filed over 10,000 federal court copyright infringement cases across the United States for nearly a decade now. No company files more lawsuits (to my knowledge) than this company does.
Originally posted 2015-07-20 14:36:07. Republished by Blog Post PromoterI’ve written so much, for so long, about the branding and trademark adventures — overwhelmingly unhappy ones — of Starbucks that I’ve pretty much run out of ways of starting blog posts such as this one. (See what I did there? — Ed.) Maybe that (not my […] The post New brew for Starbucks and trademark?
This week in Other Barks & Bites: the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) plans to ask a judge to force Google to sell Chrome in an ongoing legal case accusing Google of monopolistic practices; WIPO member states adopt the Riyadh Design Law Treaty; and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) grants Twitter’s motion to dismiss a preliminary injunction in a patent infringement case.
A jury determined Tuesday, November 20, that Vintage Brands willfully violated Penn State University's trademarks by selling merchandise featuring vintage Penn State logos. The jury also rejected Vintage Brands’ affirmative defenses and counterclaims against Penn State.
DLA Piper announced the addition of an experienced patent attorney, who most recently co-led Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP's China intellectual property practice, as a partner based out of Seattle.
Women and diverse employees have the technical skill and knowledge, yet their contributions are not patented at the same rate as those of their male counterparts.This toolkit can help organizations move the needle on achieving gender parity in innovation.
Did Netflix push the boundaries of “based on a true story”? Scott Hervey and Jamie Lincenberg discuss Harvey v. Netflix, the risks of docudramas, and explain how truth and fiction collide in this high-stakes lawsuit on this episode of The Briefing.
Delegates from the world's major intellectual property groups signed a treaty Friday that would, if approved, establish new rules to facilitate the filing of design patents.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has announced significant changes to the patent fee schedule which will take effect on January 19, 2025. The changes include new or significant increases to several targeted fees, a 10% increase to all filing fees, and an approximately 7.5% increase to all other patent fees not covered by those targeted adjustments.
Excepts from Graham Davies keynote address at today's 4th Annual Artist Rights Symposium at American University's Kogod School of Business presented by the Artist Rights Institute
Last year, as reported in a memo recently obtained by WIRED, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued internal guidance that its examiners and other employees cannot use generative artificial intelligence (AI) for any purpose.
A Texas federal jury on Friday said computer memory company Netlist Inc. should get $118 million after finding that South Korean electronics giant Samsung infringed a trio of computer memory module patents.
While it has become common practice to bid on or purchase a competitor’s trademark to use as a search engine keyword, there remains some confusion about when such practices create liability for trademark infringement.
A federal judge in San Antonio says the Patent Act's immunity protecting physicians from patent lawsuits is "broad, but it is not limitless," and it does not extend to a wellness software licensing company that "only licenses its product to medical providers.
Attention, inventors, in-house counsel, and anyone with a vested interest in the world of intellectual property: the USPTO just issued its final rule for patent fees. This is a follow-up to the 2023 proposal—but with a slightly softer landing.
A Miami-based delta-8 THC products manufacturer is looking to toss an infringement lawsuit filed by a former business partner, telling a Florida federal judge that the suit appears to be a patent fight and therefore belongs in trademark court.
Did Netflix push the boundaries of “based on a true story”? Scott Hervey and Jamie Lincenberg discuss Harvey v. Netflix, the risks of docudramas, and explain how truth and fiction collide in this high-stakes lawsuit on this episode of The Briefing.
A federal jury in New York has found in a retrial that lighting fixture company Lutron Electronics should have to pony up $2.67 million for infringing a company's window shade patent.
Amongst the many decisions an attorney makes throughout litigation, there is one choice that can shape the outcome of a case way before filing a motion, setting discovery and trial strategy, or even calling a witness: venue, where the case will be adjudicated. The governing statute limits patent venue to (i) the judicial district in which the defendant resides; or (ii) where the defendant has “committed acts of infringement and has a regular and established place of business.”.
The Federal Circuit has declined to rethink a ruling last month that upended what was once a multimillion-dollar jury verdict in a decadelong tire design dispute, rejecting the argument that the judges "overlooked and misapprehended Illinois law" on the matter of "litigation privilege.
The PTAB recently excluded a portion of Duration Media LLC’s (Petitioner) reply declaration for containing improper new evidence in an inter partes review petition filed against Rich Media Club LLC (Patent Owner) challenging all claims of U.S. Pat. No. 11,443,329. Media LLC v. Rich Media Club LLC, IPR2023-00953, Paper 74 (PTAB Aug. 19, 2024). Specifically, the PTAB found that Petitioner could not submit a second declaration by its expert to address a claim limitation that Petitioner wrongly.
As more and more parties find themselves in two different forums addressing the same issues and then competing in a race to the Federal Circuit, certain strategies can help despite unanswered questions on when Patent Trial and Appeal Board determinations trigger collateral estoppel, say attorneys at Akin.
by Dennis Crouch In a tight 11-10 vote, the Senate Judiciary Committee approved the PREVAIL Act (Promoting and Respecting Economically Vital American Innovation Leadership Act) that would make substantial changes to Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) proceedings. The bill addresses perceived anti-patentee imbalances in the current inter partes review (IPR) system.
The Federal Circuit on Friday refused to revive claims in an electronic pipe patent that was challenged by Philip Morris, backing a Patent Trial and Appeal Board finding that language in the patent could be found in older patent paperwork.
The Board affirmed a refusal to register the mark ENDURELITE , finding confusion likely with the registered mark ENDUROLETE , both for dietary and nutritional supplements. The marks are "extremely similar," the goods identical in-part, and the channels of trade and classes of consumers for those goods are presumably identical. Applicant argued that, under Strategic Partners , its ownership of a registration for the mark ENDURELITE FUELING FAST & Design (shown immediately below) justifies reg
Norfolk Southern said Thursday it should still get an early win over an artist who sued the company for allegedly covering over murals on a railroad bridge, even after a federal magistrate found the sham affidavit doctrine didn't apply when the artist changed his story during depositions spanning two lawsuits.
Dog Tech, Ghosts, and the Law Please join us Monday, November 25, 2024, at noon where we will discuss recent decisions made by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in DoggyPhone LLC v. Tomofun LLC, No. 2023-1791 (Fed. Cir. 2024) and by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in [.
A photography business is accusing a sports content website of using its picture of New York Knicks star Jalen Brunson without permission, saying the website infringed copyrights in a complaint filed in New York federal court Friday.
Tuesday, December 17, 2024 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. Eastern 12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. Central 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Mountain 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. Pacific Register Here About the Program Join us for the final installment of Seyfarths 2024 Trade Secrets Webinar Series, where our panel will provide practical guidance on navigating non-compete agreements, safeguarding trade secrets, and understanding critical regulatory developments impacting employers across the United States.
A Manhattan federal judge dealt a huge blow to The Intercept's complaint accusing Microsoft and OpenAI of removing author and copyright information from works used to train ChatGPT, dismissing all claims against Microsoft and leaving only one claim against OpenAI alive.
RNH was a junior last year at Hingham High School in Massachusetts. He got a perfect ACT store and hopes for early admission to Stanford. The school repeatedly told students about limitations on the use of Generative AI for school assignments. With respect to the assignment at issue here, Generative AI was not categorically banned. Instead, allegedly students could “use AI to brainstorm topic ideas and key words to research a topic, as well as to look for resources.” (Cleaned up).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content